Started By
Message
re: Will SC go 5-0 vs the East and still not go to Atlanta?
Posted on 10/27/11 at 2:06 pm to UpstateCock2007
Posted on 10/27/11 at 2:06 pm to UpstateCock2007
I'm still trying to find tickets I can afford. 
1
Posted on 10/27/11 at 2:08 pm to QCC
Obviously the baseball team and Tanner are just simply better and more talent than a lot of their SEC counterparts, something that can't be said for the football team so in a way its apples to oranges but I can't help but notice how people felt when JBJr went down (in Starkville) in baseball and instead of accepting defeat of losing our best hitter / OF.. we just kept on playing.
With that said I doubt our football team will get a shot at an NC this year but they still have a lot they can accomplish.
With that said I doubt our football team will get a shot at an NC this year but they still have a lot they can accomplish.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 2:11 pm to CNB
Come to Calhoun's on Saturday, we will help you find some. I have a friend that put two for sale on facebook, but I don't know what he is asking. He will be there tailgating though.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 2:18 pm to theGarnetWay
You are right.
Baseball is different. you also play games in series.
Baseball is different. you also play games in series.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 2:21 pm to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
Baseball is different. you also play games in series.
Not that we would've needed series to win the NC with that sparkling 10-0 record.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 2:42 pm to theGarnetWay
quote:
but I can't help but notice how people felt when JBJr went down (in Starkville) in baseball and instead of accepting defeat of losing our best hitter / OF.. we just kept on playing
I kinda get the feeling our fan base has that mentality for the football team, too. I haven't really heard that much negativity at all, really. Matter of fact, it surprised me to hear so many fans using the phrase "win anyway."
I'm echoing that sentiment
Posted on 10/27/11 at 2:44 pm to QCC
Don't read the Gamecock boards. I have read them for my last time.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 2:48 pm to UpstateCock2007
I ignore ingorance (imagine that 
)
Most everything I've heard from the rumblings that have crossed my path have been nothing but positive support.
) Most everything I've heard from the rumblings that have crossed my path have been nothing but positive support.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 2:52 pm to QCC
If bruce doesn't play do we still run the Wild Cat?
I say no.
I say no.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 2:52 pm to theGarnetWay
It's possible. Right now, I don't see the Cocks beating the Hogs.
But then again, I'm pretty sure Richt will find a way to lose to UF...again.
I think it will come down to the UF-USC game.
But then again, I'm pretty sure Richt will find a way to lose to UF...again.
I think it will come down to the UF-USC game.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 2:59 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
down to the UF-USC game
Hopefully UGAy will have lost before then
Posted on 10/27/11 at 2:59 pm to I Bleed Garnet
I would say No as well, unless Ace or someone has picked it up.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:01 pm to UpstateCock2007
I would see Wilds running it before Ace. Seriously.
Maybe even throw Byrd in there? Hell, we would have to do something. Hopefully Bruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuce will play.
Maybe even throw Byrd in there? Hell, we would have to do something. Hopefully Bruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuce will play.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:04 pm to QCC
Wilds? I think he would run the hammer or whatever Latt ran, but not necessarily the wildcat. Are they the same thing?
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:15 pm to UpstateCock2007
No. Wildcat is an extra tackle loaded to one side (Lattimore was actually in one-back and NOT wildcat on a good many carries, it's just easy to confuse the two). Hammer, if you're talking about the E&H, is 3 OL in the tackle box, plus the TE and wing back.
I bet Wilds could do either. The coaches seem to have enough confidence in the kid, and he's not lacking in that category either.
I bet Wilds could do either. The coaches seem to have enough confidence in the kid, and he's not lacking in that category either.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:24 pm to UpstateCock2007
I really didn't realize Wilds was 6-1 223.
For Some reason i thought he weighed less.
This kid after a few years in the S&C is gonna beef up.
Look at latti. that would be great to have those 2 type of backs in the backfield.
For Some reason i thought he weighed less.
This kid after a few years in the S&C is gonna beef up.
Look at latti. that would be great to have those 2 type of backs in the backfield.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:24 pm to QCC
Yea, I think I could see Wilds in the hammer more than WC. I just think of WC utilizing a speedy guy.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:25 pm to UpstateCock2007
When you say Hammer, you're talking about the split-tackle formation right? The E&H?
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:26 pm to I Bleed Garnet
And Wilds definitely has room to put on at least 10-15 more without affecting his speed. We'll get a nice sample of the 1-2 flavor they'll provide us next year in the coming weeks. Could be great, guys
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:28 pm to QCC
Yes, I am talking about when Latt lined up, then we split the tackles out wide. I liked that formation. Ran it 3 times with Latt taking the snap, and he gained about 6-7 each time. That is what I was referring to as the hammer, but I might have labeled it wrong.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News