Started By
Message
re: Why is Auburn the only member of the "big 6" unable to sustain success?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:01 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:01 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Not me. Not even close. Try again Biff.
1
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:03 pm to nc14
wait Auburn fans are tying to blackout over 20 years of football to prove a point?
when did this "if not for Bear" shite become a thing and what idiot thought it was a smart argument?
when did this "if not for Bear" shite become a thing and what idiot thought it was a smart argument?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:03 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
National stamding comes from National Titles, hence Bama is the GOAT.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:06 pm to beatbammer
quote:
Nope, you just had the greatest coach in college football history for about 25 years and he beat us like a red-headed step-child.
Outside of that one singular era? Not even close.
So let me get this straight: you belittle some Bama posters for making excuses about the Iron Bowl this year-- chastising them for saying things like "Well if you ignore the last play..." or "If you ignore the illegal blocking downfield on the pass to Coates..." and now you sit here, typing "Well if y'all never had Bear for over two decades" with a straight face?
This post was edited on 4/22/14 at 7:08 pm
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:07 pm to Eventual_Seizure
quote:
I'd say that the older and larger school is usually the "big brother", even though I'd never use that term myself because I'm not a douchebag.
Not in FL though. FSU is the oldest and UCF is the largest.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:07 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
AU had a larger student body for a long time until Bama lowered their admission standards to try and get warm bodies.
Eesh. You have to work on your insults. That sounds like "Bama lowered their standards to meet ours." I'm sure that's not the case, but still...
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:07 pm to Wallacewade04
quote:
wait, so in order for it to be "not even close" you have to omit over 2 decades?
damn that is pathetic
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:08 pm to Korin
quote:
Not in FL though. FSU is the oldest and UCF is the largest.
So UF has TWO big brothers?
mind = blown
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:08 pm to Won3ofTheLast5
quote:
National stamding comes from National Titles, hence Bama is the GOAT.
No, Princeton is. Or maybe Harvard. One of those two schools that were the only two football teams for a half-century or whatever.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:10 pm to nb200016
Not just pathetic, the norm.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:11 pm to randomways
Harvard is the Crimson, let's go with that.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:12 pm to randomways
Yeah Princeton's retroactive "national titles" when there were like 10 total teams each playing like 3-4 games are srz bizness.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:13 pm to nc14
quote:
Bama, however, can only beat average to bad Auburn teams.
oh jesus tap dancing christ
this thread started out bad for Bammers but the bat shite crazy word vomit you guys have been pulling out MY GOD
the "you can't beat us when we're good" argument
STAY GOOD THEN
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:15 pm to IAmReality
But back to the topic at hand, is there a real reason?
South Carolina has managed a longer 10 win season streak in the last 3 years than Auburn has in the entire history of their program?
Alabama, Florida, Tennessee, Georgia, LSU, they've all managed to string together streaks of great seasons one after the other.
What's with Auburn's ability to win SEC titles but inability to remain elite two years in a row?
South Carolina has managed a longer 10 win season streak in the last 3 years than Auburn has in the entire history of their program?
Alabama, Florida, Tennessee, Georgia, LSU, they've all managed to string together streaks of great seasons one after the other.
What's with Auburn's ability to win SEC titles but inability to remain elite two years in a row?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:16 pm to IAmReality
quote:
But back to the topic at hand, is there a real reason?
it's coaching turnover coupled with a bunch of meddlesome crack pot booster arse holes that thought they ran the place
everything else in this thread is troll bait
they got rid of the booster twats and they seem to want to keep this guy around so they should be fine for awhile
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:18 pm to randomways
quote:
Eesh. You have to work on your insults. That sounds like "Bama lowered their standards to meet ours." I'm sure that's not the case, but still...
What's funny is since UA started making expansion a priority, each year it has become more selective.
"For the fall 2003 entering class, UA accepted 85 percent of the students who applied. Each year since that time, the percent of applicants who were admitted has gradually decreased. For fall 2010, only 55 percent of those who applied were accepted."
"The class’s average ACT score is 25.8, the highest average in UA history, and 1,768 freshmen measured a high school GPA of 4.0 or above, up from 1,725 in 2012."
He was completely full of shite.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:18 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
quote:AU's football history mainly consists of dramatic wins against Bama. It's their identity as a program. Without them AU fans would have little to identify themselves as a program other than a few stellar seasons. 19 Seasons with at least 9 wins since 83.
quote:. This post started as a troll, but statistics backfired on the bammers.
Since 83 (30 Seasons) Bama has 17 9 win seasons compared to 19 for AU
This post was edited on 4/22/14 at 7:19 pm
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:19 pm to IAmReality
quote:
South Carolina has managed a longer 10 win season streak in the last 3 years than Auburn has in the entire history of their program?
quote:
What's with Auburn's ability to win SEC titles but inability to remain elite two years in a row?
Hope it never changes. Love to see them get all hyped up for a natty, then reality sets in.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:20 pm to Irons Puppet
quote:
This post started as a troll, but statistics backfired on the bammers
Auburn has had 6 10 win seasons since Pat Dye left
Alabama has had 6 10 win seasons in a row
don't trust stats to really tell you the story man it's all manipulated bull shite at the end of the day
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:20 pm to IAmReality
quote:
What's with Auburn's ability to win SEC titles but inability to remain elite two years in a row?
That is a myth....Again........
2000: 9-4-0 SEC - West Division Champions
2001: 7-5-0 SEC - Western Division Co-Champions
2002: 9-4-0 SEC - Western Division Co-Champions
2003: 8-5-0
2004: 13-0-0 Southeastern Conference Champions
2005: 9-3-0 SEC - Western Division Co-Champions
2006: 11-2-0
2007: 9-4-0
2008: 5-7-0 He gone.
2009: 8-5-0
2010: 14-0-0 National Champions
Page 6 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News