Started By
Message

re: Why do people believe Saban would have built a dynasty if he had stayed at LSU?

Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:04 am to
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66465 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:04 am to
Probably because the team was stacked from 2005-2007. Les Miles won 10+ games and a NC in those years, I think most people feel Saban could have too. Then imagine 2011 without Saban at Alabama.

I don't think we would be some unstoppable machine like Bama currently is, but at the same time i think he would have won at least 1 more probably 2 national championships by now.

The LSu Saban took over was trash and he won a 2 SEC Championships and a NC in his first 4 years here. The guy who took over the team went 35-6 in the next 3 years. So unless you think Miles did something Saban couldn't have done, i think we were about to get rolling.
Posted by BhamDore
Nashville
Member since Aug 2009
6287 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:07 am to
He had success at LSU because of Alabama's probation and subsequent bad coaching hires.

No other program is able to have sustained dominance in the West without Alabama being down.

Alabama won the West more than half of the time in the 90s. Then the probation and bad coaching hires happened. When Bama finally came off probation there has been little margin for error for all other teams in the West.

The Alabama program has elevated Saban into the discussion of Greatest of All-time.

LSU is a good program with some resources, but Alabama is at an unattainable level by any other program.
Posted by LC412000
Any location where a plane flies
Member since Mar 2004
16673 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:09 am to
Another one of your threads you start and then run and hide. What a Nancy
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64606 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:09 am to
quote:

He had success at LSU because of Alabama's probation and subsequent bad coaching hires.

What's your point? If he's at LSU he's not at Alabama, and Alabama got turned down by Rich Rodriguez before Saban became available. There's no telling who they would have had to resort to if Saban didn't fall into their laps. For all we know they could have hired another unimpressive coach like Franchione/Price/Dubose/Shula.
Posted by CRAZY 4 LSU
Member since Apr 2006
16903 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:10 am to
quote:

LSU is a good program with some resources, but Alabama is at an unattainable level by any other program.




"We're just Bama because WE'RE BAMA, PAWWWWLLLL"
This post was edited on 11/8/16 at 9:11 am
Posted by OKtiger
Tulsa, OK
Member since Nov 2014
8595 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:15 am to
Posted by Arksulli
Fayetteville
Member since Aug 2014
25192 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:16 am to
quote:

LSU has a strong hold on a rich recruiting pool. I think he could have won multiple championships there had he stayed


That pretty well says it all.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67589 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:18 am to
quote:

Please explain 2000-2007


bad coaching and talent
Posted by bamasgot13
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2010
13619 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:23 am to
quote:

You do realize he was only at LSU for 5 years right?

Yes, I do. And in his 5 years at LSU he won 2 SEC and 1 National title. He had a record of 48-16 and two seasons of 10+ wins.

In his first 5 years at Bama he won 1 SEC and 2 national titles. he had a record of 55-12 and 4 seasons of 10+ wins.

His overall tenure at Bama is certainly better than it was at LSU and it's been twice as long, so it isn't "fair" to look at entire tenure. however, even his first 5 years at Bama were better than his 5 year tenure at LSU.
Posted by bamasgot13
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2010
13619 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:24 am to
quote:

bad coaching and talent


But if the SEC and the refs were in Bama's pocket, then shouldn't they have been able to overcome bad coaching and talent?
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
155576 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Alabama made Saban great.


Please wrap up when entering cousin
Posted by tigahland
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jun 2016
3216 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:25 am to
I think it's bc Saban laid the foundation for LSU Football into what it is today. If he had stayed he would have had the same success @ LSU as he is having @ BAMA
Posted by caliegeaux
Member since Aug 2004
10145 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:34 am to
time.

he was rebuilding and needed time

he won his 1st NC in 2003 and 2004 was a down year...but he was still building.

look at his 1st NC at BAMA, and then the next year.

But he stayed and kept building at BAMA.

Thats what we were thinking could happen had he stayed.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64606 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:39 am to
quote:

Yes, I do. And in his 5 years at LSU he won 2 SEC and 1 National title. He had a record of 48-16 and two seasons of 10+ wins.

In his first 5 years at Bama he won 1 SEC and 2 national titles. he had a record of 55-12 and 4 seasons of 10+ wins.

His overall tenure at Bama is certainly better than it was at LSU and it's been twice as long, so it isn't "fair" to look at entire tenure. however, even his first 5 years at Bama were better than his 5 year tenure at LSU.


I know you don't want to admit this, but the rebuilding project he inherited at LSU was much bigger than the one at Alabama. Additionally, Saban learned and got better with more experience, just like most people do in their jobs. He was a better coach in 2007 than he was in 2000 when he took over the LSU program. He was a better coach when he left LSU than when he got there as well.
Posted by aujerm
North ATL burbs
Member since Oct 2016
964 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:45 am to
He would have had a dynasty at LSU just not on the same level as he has at bama due to the money, resources, and support he current has at UA.
Posted by LSU82BILL
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Member since Sep 2006
10321 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:46 am to
quote:

These numbers tell me one of two things. Either it's much easier for a coach to win big at Bama or Saban became a much better and improved coach after his two year stint in the NFL. However you look at it, Saban showed no signs of building this incredible uber-dominant program if he had stayed at LSU.


If 2 years in the NFL is what made Saban "better and improved", why did he come back to go 7-6 in 2007 while LSU was a combined 34-6 in the 3 seasons after he left with a dummy of a head coach at the helm?
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 9:50 am to
Kinda tough to originally claim that Miles is having success with Sabans recruits.. acknowledge that Saban is a better coach than Miles.. look at Miles success from 2005-2011..

And then think that Saban couldn't have done better.

Dumb thread.
Posted by UFFan
Planet earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Member since Aug 2016
1946 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 10:00 am to
The writings of LSU fans.
Posted by CRAZY 4 LSU
Member since Apr 2006
16903 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 10:04 am to
quote:

money, resources

LSU has equal or more revenue depending on the year, and LSU's geography is legitimately better for recruiting. BAMA has a national brand because they are the current dynasty so they pull nationally at this time, however.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64606 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 10:05 am to
quote:

Kinda tough to originally claim that Miles is having success with Sabans recruits.. acknowledge that Saban is a better coach than Miles.. look at Miles success from 2005-2011..

And then think that Saban couldn't have done better.

Dumb thread.


They're just spinning their wheels, per the usual. They think they made Saban what he is, not that they were mutually beneficial to each other. Same with Saban and LSU. The coach and program need each other to build something great. People forget that LSU made Saban the highest paid coach in the country. Bertman started providing Saban with the money necessary to compete nationally. LSU didn't just dig out of the hole they were in 100% because Saban is a good coach. Same with Alabama. Alabama isn't Alabama because of some sort of predestination. They are Alabama because they've hired the best coach in the country and provided him with unlimited resources to succeed.

LSU, in the year 2016 provides any coach the resources to succeed. You put the right coach with those resources, and it will produce championships. Championships are not won because of reputations. Times have changed. Alabama has the resources and the coach. Saban is that good.
This post was edited on 11/8/16 at 10:07 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter