Started By
Message
re: Why Clemson's last two TD's should have been penalties
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:08 am to Benedict_ARNY
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:08 am to Benedict_ARNY
quote:
Why Bama should of had two targeting calls.... why Bama should of had holding on their first touchdown run..
Why you "should of" paid attention in school.
0
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:09 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
For the second time, cite your textbook.
You won't though, because you know you're full of shite.
How about I cite Rogers Redding himself, you frick?
quote:
an obvious intent to impede a defender
quote:
According to NCAA rules, the crossing receiver cannot purposely impede the progress of the defensive player. In both the NFL and NCAA, blocking more than a yard downfield prior to a pass being thrown is considered pass interference.
The difficulty for officials is determining whether contact with a defensive player was intentional or not.
LINK
It's a moot point, though, because like I said - we got our arse whipped.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:09 am to WorkinDawg
quote:Explain how you can run a route when the DB drags you down and tackles you
but the outside receiver was not running a route, nor did he pretend to run a route.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:09 am to Benedict_ARNY
quote:
Why Bama should of had two targeting calls.... why Bama should of had holding on their first touchdown run...... It goes both ways. Only losers cry about it.
While Bama lost to a more complete team which is what happened to Clemson last year. The rules in this game or rather how they are called definitely benefits the offenses. I think the fact it is Big 12 officials just exacerbated it. Holds are being called offensive pass interference not being called and holding not being called. I would like the game to go back to what it used to be IMO.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:10 am to narddogg81
quote:
Saying pick confuses the issue, especially on the first one. People will say the back DB didn't get touched, but that doesn't matter. A rrceiver can't block down field before the pass is thrown, which is exactly what the TE did on that play, went straight at the DB and blocked him 4 yards before the ball was thrown. That's offensive PI regardless. Second one is more gray area. The wr is definitely blocking, but the DB also is engaging
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:11 am to Tuscaloosa
quote:
According to NCAA rules, the crossing receiver cannot purposely impede the progress of the defensive player
Well, that didn't happen, so....
Melt.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:12 am to Ramblin Wreck
Seriously, this is why the reaction is what it is from the rest of the SEC. We bitch about calls when we play bama, and we are crybabies. Nobody feels sorry for bama when it happens to you.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:12 am to LNCHBOX
Nah bra, for real
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:13 am to LNCHBOX
Laughing emoticons means you got nothing
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:13 am to lsupride87
We are fighting a pointless battle
If you think you're gonna change their minds, you're wasting your time
If you think you're gonna change their minds, you're wasting your time
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:13 am to narddogg81
Ok so were the no-calls right, or wrong? And explain please
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:14 am to Mr. Hangover
quote:
Nah bra, for real
I upvoted Box for first time as well.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:15 am to narddogg81
quote:
Laughing emoticons means you got nothing
No, it means your post was that fricking stupid.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:15 am to narddogg81
quote:
Laughing emoticons means you got nothing
here is yours
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:15 am to narddogg81
quote:
The wr is definitely blocking, but the DB also is engaging
This guy gets it. The second was clearly not illegal because once the DB put his arms around the receiver there was no way they were getting called on the pick play. Had he tried to avoid the contact or let the guy run him over he would have a case but engaging in that situation was actually not a bad plan except for the consequences it had on the OTHER DB.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:15 am to Nado Jenkins83
Hey nado
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:15 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
I upvoted Box for first time as well.
You guys are so full of shite
Nado, I can guarantee you've upvoted me in truck threads in the past for starters.
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:16 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Well, that didn't happen, so....
Oh... okay.
/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/7782113/clemsonwins.0.gif)
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:16 am to lsupride87
I really think he was just looking for whichever receiver came free. The first TD it was obvious, this play wasn't.
This post was edited on 1/10/17 at 11:17 am
Posted on 1/10/17 at 11:16 am to labamafan
quote:
The rules in this game or rather how they are called definitely benefits the offenses.
I assume you realize that the NCAA, NFL, etc intend for that to be the case.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News