Started By
Message
re: Which SEC team has had the best program since 2000?
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:02 pm to ShreveportHog94
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:02 pm to ShreveportHog94
you hate LSU like VC hates Arkansas. Yall can't talk objectively about either school imo
1
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:02 pm to OSqueal
quote:
Why cause you dont agree with it?
No because it's idiotic. In the first half of the time period stated by the OP Bama was in the shitter.
This post was edited on 7/8/12 at 6:04 pm
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:02 pm to NBamaAlum
hey...I choose to let a SEC Title separate the two when most all else are equal (4 titles to 3). You prefer to let a heisman by an individual separate them....makes sense. Everything else is the same except that LSU has finished higher more times in the final rankings. I can definitely understand you not wanting to use SEC Titles as a tie breaker during that period of time....LOL
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:04 pm to Elleshoe
Really I look at who had true championship teams. LSU split one title and we are all familiar with what 07 came with. Bama and Florida put teams together that were clearly championship caliber teams. Auburn was a 1 hit wonder but clearly put a better team in the field than anyin the history of LSU. Bama and Florida teams would play for titles every season the 07 and 03 LSU teams would challenge for 3rd in the west every year.
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:04 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
You benefitted from being the best team in 07
And? Sorry for being the best..
quote:
thus backdooring a NC off it.
Happens damn near every year.. Happened to Bama this year.
quote:
Florida is clearly ahead in that time frame
In football, no they are not. They are neck and neck. Arkansas is nowhere to be found
quote:
and I would still rather be Bama or Auburn
Of course you would, you are an arkansas fan in Shreveport. Im sure your distaste for LSU is mighty strong.
BTW, this is a discussion for teams tat have an argument for best in the SEC since 2000. Why all the pigs?
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:04 pm to VC
quote:quote:
frick
Here we go
no offense, this is not an arkansas thread:
0 SEC Titles
0 National Titles
0 BCS Bowl Wins
Boy, he sure showed U hg.
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:04 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Helpful hint going forward that relates to more than this board...
Yeah, it does.
Alright, back to football. What is interesting is that neither of the best teams during this arbitrary timeframe have recorded an undefeated season.
quote:
My motivations doesn't weaken the argument
Yeah, it does.
Alright, back to football. What is interesting is that neither of the best teams during this arbitrary timeframe have recorded an undefeated season.
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:04 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
Really I look at who had true championship teams
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:05 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
Really I look at who had true championship teams. LSU split one title and we are all familiar with what 07 came with. Bama and Florida put teams together that were clearly championship caliber teams. Auburn was a 1 hit wonder but clearly put a better team in the field than anyin the history of LSU. Bama and Florida teams would play for titles every season the 07 and 03 LSU teams would challenge for 3rd in the west every year.
So much fail, I dont know where to start.
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:05 pm to tiger perry
quote:
you hate LSU like VC hates Arkansas. Yall can't talk objectively about either school imo
I can talk very objectively about it. I honestly don't hate arkansas. Here is objective:
During time-period mentioned:
LSU 4 SEC Titles
LSU 2 NC's
LSU 4 BCS Bowl Wins
LSU 8 Bowl Wins
Ark 0 SEC Titles
Ark 0 NC's
Ark 0 BCS Bowl Win
Ark <8 Bowl wins...by far.
That's pretty objective.
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:06 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
Yeah, it does.
No it really doesn't, trying to discredit my motivation as opposed to the actual argument (as you've once again done) is just proving that you don't feel you have a strong enough rebuttal argument.
This post was edited on 7/8/12 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:06 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
Alright, back to football. What is interesting is that neither of the best teams during this arbitrary timeframe have recorded an undefeated season.
Your arbitrary is most peoples current. Sorry we arent talking about the championships your grandparents celebrated.
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:07 pm to NicoBlues
quote:
Your arbitrary is most peoples current. Sorry we arent talking about the championships your grandparents celebrated.
In fairness what makes 1999 worse than 2000?
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:08 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
No it really doesn't, trying to discredit my motivation as opposed to the actual argument (as you've once again done) is just proving that you don't feel you have a strong enough rebuttal argument.
You totally missed the point of my comment. Best of luck to you on the exam, and I hope that the learning curve of the actual practice isn't steep.
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:08 pm to NicoBlues
quote:
So much fail, I dont know where to start.
He's extremely butthurt and jealous
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:09 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
In fairness what makes 1999 worse than 2000?
Not sure what you're getting at. Ican see why 2000 is the cutoff point. Its a round number.. It represents the current century. It is a prety large sample size, being it is the last 11 years.
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:10 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
That little thing they handed Timmy in the Nokia Theater, and shite like that, is to be taken into consideration.
Gives UF the nod.
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:10 pm to NicoBlues
Of course not Lsu doesn't have the history Bama does,not even fricking close.
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:10 pm to VC
quote:
Florida
Posted on 7/8/12 at 6:11 pm to NicoBlues
How bout the last 3 years?
Page 3 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News