Started By
Message
re: Which of the SEC BCS Champs Could Beat 2004 USC?
Posted on 8/10/13 at 11:22 pm to mwlewis
Posted on 8/10/13 at 11:22 pm to mwlewis
because 2007 LSU had 2 losses thats the only thing your basing them not being able to beat 04 SC On. That was the weirdest CFB year of all time, they are not even close to being the worst BCS championship team of all time
2
Posted on 8/10/13 at 11:39 pm to GenesChin
quote:
Dude, there is no way in hell that a Matt Leinart led team would beat a Cam Newton led team
no way in hell a gene chizik coached team beats a pete carroll team.
Posted on 8/10/13 at 11:40 pm to townhallsavoy
USC '04 was gross. I'd say any of the Bama teams and the '08 Florida team. The others would be close.
Posted on 8/10/13 at 11:40 pm to 632627
quote:
no way in hell a gene chizik coached team beats a pete carroll team.
Agree with this. Auburn had trouble with Oregon. That '04 USC team would have eaten them alive.
Posted on 8/10/13 at 11:42 pm to Henry Jones Jr
08 florida team is most complete sec champ.
04 usc was absolutely loaded and balanced on offense and defense.
04 usc was absolutely loaded and balanced on offense and defense.
Posted on 8/10/13 at 11:44 pm to 632627
I agree '04 USC was loaded but I don't think they could beat the '08 UF team or the Bama teams. Everyone else is a toss up. Y'all get Auburn. I don't think that's even a question.
Posted on 8/10/13 at 11:47 pm to townhallsavoy
quote:
I'm going to say that 2008 Florida, 2011 Alabama, and 2012 Alabama could beat 2004 USC.
2006 Florida, 2007 LSU, 2009 Alabama, and 2010 Auburn would lose.
'09 Bama would beat '04 USC IMO
Posted on 8/10/13 at 11:48 pm to LSU_2012
quote:
because 2007 LSU had 2 losses thats the only thing your basing them not being able to beat 04 SC On. That was the weirdest CFB year of all time, they are not even close to being the worst BCS championship team of all time
Great teams don't lose 2 games to unranked opponents.
Posted on 8/10/13 at 11:52 pm to Henry Jones Jr
i feel the bama teams wouldnt have the offensive firepower to keep up with SC. the oklahoma offense that SC shut down was better than any of the bama offenses.
not to take anything away from alabama, but the notre dame team they beat was a joke, texas lost colt mccoy, and the only thing i have to say about lsu is "JJ". the 04 usc offense bears no resemblance to any of those teams alabama beat for their national championships.
best matchup is against 08 florida
not to take anything away from alabama, but the notre dame team they beat was a joke, texas lost colt mccoy, and the only thing i have to say about lsu is "JJ". the 04 usc offense bears no resemblance to any of those teams alabama beat for their national championships.
best matchup is against 08 florida
This post was edited on 8/10/13 at 11:54 pm
Posted on 8/10/13 at 11:54 pm to 632627
quote:
i feel the bama teams wouldnt have the offensive firepower to keep up with SC.
They wouldn't have to. The defenses wouldn't allow USC to score more than 3 touchdowns IMO. It would be low scoring.
Posted on 8/10/13 at 11:54 pm to 632627
USC was loaded alright, all the way to the bank loaded
Posted on 8/10/13 at 11:56 pm to mwlewis
2011 Bama
2008 UF
2003 LSU by coaching staff alone jesus lol
2009 Bama
Those four I'd take over 2004 USC.
2008 UF
2003 LSU by coaching staff alone jesus lol
2009 Bama
Those four I'd take over 2004 USC.
Posted on 8/10/13 at 11:58 pm to 632627
quote:
i feel the bama teams wouldnt have the offensive firepower to keep up with SC. the oklahoma offense that SC shut down was better than any of the bama offenses.
not to take anything away from alabama, but the notre dame team they beat was a joke, texas lost colt mccoy, and the only thing i have to say about lsu is "JJ". the 04 usc offense bears no resemblance to any of those teams alabama beat for their national championships.
Thanks for "not taking anything away" from us. lol
Alabama has a long, long history in big games of "not having enough offensive firepower" yet winning handily anyway. I don't know what would happen with 04 USC, but you can bet all three of the championship teams from Bama over the last 4 years would score some points.
Posted on 8/11/13 at 12:01 am to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
They wouldn't have to. The defenses wouldn't allow USC to score more than 3 touchdowns IMO. It would be low scoring.
a&m and georgia were able to move the ball and score on bama last year, im sure bush, leinart etc could figure out how to do the same.
Posted on 8/11/13 at 12:02 am to 632627
quote:
texas lost colt mccoy
IRRELEVANT
Posted on 8/11/13 at 12:02 am to 08Gatorbait
quote:
2011 Bama
2008 UF
2003 LSU by coaching staff alone jesus lol
2009 Bama
I agree, I'd also put LSU's 2006 team on that list
Posted on 8/11/13 at 12:03 am to 632627
A&M had a spread offense and Saban has always had a little trouble with that. Any traditional offense, Saban is going to stop it some how. The linebacker and defensive line speed is something that the Alabama teams have that '04 USC didn't come close to seeing that year.
Posted on 8/11/13 at 12:03 am to TbirdSpur2010
I forgot about that guy
Posted on 8/11/13 at 12:04 am to TbirdSpur2010
hows it irrelevant that they played the game without their qb?
i sure as frick wish vince young got injured in the first quarter of the 06 bcsng
i sure as frick wish vince young got injured in the first quarter of the 06 bcsng
Posted on 8/11/13 at 12:05 am to 632627
quote:
no way in hell a gene chizik coached team beats a pete carroll team.
Even less chance of a Pete Carroll team losing to a Mack Brown team. But yet, with the right player...
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News