Started By
Message
Which Men's Athletic Program is Worse Right Now - Auburn or Missouri?
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:53 pm
2015 Football
Auburn: 2-6 in SEC play, last in West Division
Missouri: 1-7 in SEC play, tied for last in East Division
2015-2016 Basketball
Auburn: 5-13 in SEC play, second to last conference
Missouri: 3-15 in SEC play, last in conference
2016 Baseball
Auburn: 8-22 in SEC play, second to last in West Division
Missouri: 9-21 in SEC play, tied for last in East Division
I think the numbers suggest Missouri, but when taking into account expectations, Auburn seems to be in the cellar right now.
Auburn: 2-6 in SEC play, last in West Division
Missouri: 1-7 in SEC play, tied for last in East Division
2015-2016 Basketball
Auburn: 5-13 in SEC play, second to last conference
Missouri: 3-15 in SEC play, last in conference
2016 Baseball
Auburn: 8-22 in SEC play, second to last in West Division
Missouri: 9-21 in SEC play, tied for last in East Division
I think the numbers suggest Missouri, but when taking into account expectations, Auburn seems to be in the cellar right now.
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 2:00 pm
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:55 pm to TexasAg13
Missouri. This was the worst overall year our AD has ever had, I would imagine.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:55 pm to TexasAg13
Yet, still whipped up A&M in College Station
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 1:57 pm
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:58 pm to AU24
A&M's athletic program is far superior to Auburns. Not sure why I'm even wasting my time responding to you.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 1:59 pm to TexasAg13
Umm the numbers suggest Auburn.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:00 pm to Supravol22
quote:
Not even close
The numbers say otherwise. Both are terrible across the board
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:01 pm to hg
quote:
Umm the numbers suggest Auburn
Not so good with numbers I see.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:01 pm to hg
quote:
Umm the numbers suggest Auburn.
How so? Can you read numbers?
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:02 pm to DuncanIdaho
Op had 7-7 for Missouri in football before he edited
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:02 pm to StringedInstruments
quote:
Can you read numbers?
Even better, he taste them...
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:02 pm to TexasAg13
Missouri based on the numbers. You could argue Auburn based on expectations, but history shows that Auburn will get back to respectability.
Missouri on the other hand just spent a season damaging their reputation. Considering they are not in a recruiting-friendly location, I seriously doubt they will be rebuilding any time soon.
Missouri on the other hand just spent a season damaging their reputation. Considering they are not in a recruiting-friendly location, I seriously doubt they will be rebuilding any time soon.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:03 pm to TexasAg13
quote:
I think the numbers suggest Missouri
quote:
Missouri. Not even close
quote:
The numbers say otherwise
Definitely Missouri
This post was edited on 6/7/16 at 2:03 pm
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:03 pm to hg
It's still not far off. Missouri's numbers are slightly worse, but considering how much Auburn has talked up the resurgence of their bball program with Pearl, the results are disastrous.
Aubies, thoughts on your Athletic Director?
Aubies, thoughts on your Athletic Director?
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:04 pm to TexasAg13
Mizzou & AU sucking on the hind teet of the SEC.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:04 pm to GeauxPack81
Was referring to the "not even close" part. It's actually very close.
Posted on 6/7/16 at 2:06 pm to TexasAg13
If Mizzou & Auburn combined teams do you think they'd finish in the top half or any of the sports?
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News