Started By
Message
re: Updated: The Elephant, The Midget, and the Wardrobe---KEEP DISCUSSION HERE***
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:37 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:37 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
During the first couple of weeks, there was no difference in the stories with regards to actual investigations
You serious? They are interupting Sports Center to talk about this like they did when the pay for play allegations came out?
2
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:37 pm to Bellabama
quote:
i'll admit i don't think this is a big issue and i hate to agree with finebaum but i think clay travis will continue to run with the story to "pimp" his website. Just glad some of the focus is on you guys..if only for a minute.
AGREE
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:40 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
They are interupting Sports Center to talk about this like they did when the pay for play allegations came out?
You are talking about the coverage..not the story.
ESpn broke SC to talk about somethign that has turned out to be nothing(thus far)...if they did that now, the situation wouldbe the same(thus far).
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:40 pm to HailToTheChiz
I will put this here because I dont want to start another thread.
quote:
@CharlesRobinson Charles Robinson As for the "10", I give you the original Benjamin: "Patience will reveal all. He that can have patience can have what he will."
quote:
CharlesRobinson Charles Robinson For the tweeps asking: We don't talk anymore about what we may or may not be working on. Well-timed silence hath more eloquence than speech.
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:41 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
You serious? They are interupting Sports Center to talk about this like they did when the pay for play allegations came out?
Well yea...becuase we were awesome and you guys were arguing about who the best 1 loss team was.
I jest.
But surely you see that it's the comparison that a violation MAY HAVE OCCURED. Now granted our violation that may have occured is a lot bigger, but stil apples to apples...ours just happens to be a huge fricking apple.
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:41 pm to PuntBamaPunt
this means theFLagship only lost to cheaters last year. basically we have a shot at back to back un-losing seasons.
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:41 pm to Bellabama
Not a flame, but if any player simply denied knowledge, such as Cam did, how would the NCAA prove they had knowledge? They are his signed memorabilia; how is it Trent Richardson's job to police what this man does with his own property?
Sorry. I am very ignorant about this SCANDAL!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sorry. I am very ignorant about this SCANDAL!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:43 pm to YumYum Sauce
quote:
only lost to cheaters last year.
and AU
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:43 pm to chilld28
quote:
CharlesRobinson Charles Robinson For the tweeps asking: We don't talk anymore about what we may or may not be working on. Well-timed silence hath more eloquence than speech.
no shite
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:44 pm to YumYum Sauce
quote:
this means theFLagship only lost to cheaters last year. basically we have a shot at back to back un-losing seasons.
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:44 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
You are talking about the coverage..not the story.
ESpn broke SC to talk about somethign that has turned out to be nothing(thus far)...if they did that now, the situation wouldbe the same(thus far).
I'm talking about the coverage and the story. Clay Travis, and his new website, are the lead for this one. The Cam stuff was SC and the ilk. Thus covers the coverage. As to the story, Pay for Play involving the most dynamic player of the year vs. something that could cause a player to sit is to compare apples and oranges.
I get it. AU folks just want their pound of flesh. If the situation was reversed, I would probably feel the same way.
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:46 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
As to the story, Pay for Play involving the most dynamic player of the year vs. something that could cause a player to sit is to compare apples and oranges.
timing is the only difference here...TR is pretty important and this would get more pub in teh fall.
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:46 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
AU folks just want their pound of flesh.
half pound...im dieting.
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:48 pm to parkjas2001
Thing is nobody is saying Trent has done anything wrong. This story was a rewrite from the Bunker. Travis took a story from a blog.
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:48 pm to NBamaAlum
quote:
NBamaAlum
I'm talking about even before the SC stuff came out. Literally during the first week or so that stories started to surface about Cam. All it was were rumors, no major media outlets had anything about it yet. However, thread after thread here.
Its a moot point, but this is still an issue until proven otherwise, and we should be able to post about it until it is proven not one without the threat of getting the thread whacked or getting banned.
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:50 pm to parkjas2001
As long as the TIDE is not on a NCAA imposed diet, I can take it. 
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:51 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Doesn't matter where it came from, doesn't matter if it is getting the press now.. .All that matters is how truthful it is...
The BIG question to me, is that actual game used merchandise that the PLAYERS gave to Ttown? Why would so many of them give away Jerseys, Gloves, Helmets...
If there were just signing stuff, I can see it...
Also what is important, is what did Alabama know, what they did about it, and did they stop it?
The BIG question to me, is that actual game used merchandise that the PLAYERS gave to Ttown? Why would so many of them give away Jerseys, Gloves, Helmets...
If there were just signing stuff, I can see it...
Also what is important, is what did Alabama know, what they did about it, and did they stop it?
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:52 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
Apparently Al-Betar's wife works for the University too.... 
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:52 pm to NBamaAlum
Question for anyone that has been keeping up with this "scandal":
I read somewhere that there was a you tube commercial featuring G-Mac pimping the guys store. Is this true? Has anyone seen it? Was this commercial made before or after G-Mac finished his college career?
Being that it was G-Mac, I assume it wasn't made until after, but I was just curious.
:anxiouslyawaitsBamaChicktoangrilyappear:
I read somewhere that there was a you tube commercial featuring G-Mac pimping the guys store. Is this true? Has anyone seen it? Was this commercial made before or after G-Mac finished his college career?
Being that it was G-Mac, I assume it wasn't made until after, but I was just curious.
:anxiouslyawaitsBamaChicktoangrilyappear:
Posted on 7/26/11 at 1:53 pm to graves1
quote:
Thing is nobody is saying Trent has done anything wrong.
If he is signing jerseys and they are being sold at a higher price...then yes he is.
Page 3 of 61
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News