Started By
Message
re: Two Arkansas golfers arrested on voyeurism charges
Posted on 5/6/15 at 4:56 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Posted on 5/6/15 at 4:56 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
The victim please- we'll send the rapists to auburn they may make good players for next years football team!
0
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:00 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
Oh I think she is accountable for getting drunk with. No plans in place to get her home it doesn't make it okay to take advantage of the situation, and the two admitted to what they did so not much for them to defend them with.
I didn't realize they already admitted to the accusations. gotcha. it's difficult to sympathize with the guys when you've accomplished so much and do something that stupid
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:08 pm to tigerbait2010
I didn't read the story but.....she gets drunk, goes home with them, undressed and put on just a shirt. Has concensual sex (obviously since there's no rape charge) and then alleges rape because she sees a flash go off?
Hmmmmmmm......not passing the smell test for me yet.
But my God, when she complained about the photos, these 2 morons keep one of them?
If they are guilty of rape, fry em. But as for now, it seems like she did something she regretted and used rape as a cover of the photos that were being shown around.
Hmmmmmmm......not passing the smell test for me yet.
But my God, when she complained about the photos, these 2 morons keep one of them?
If they are guilty of rape, fry em. But as for now, it seems like she did something she regretted and used rape as a cover of the photos that were being shown around.
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:13 pm to GeeOH
Well not only did they keep one of them but admit to taking others that they say they deleted and admit that they did so without her knowledge or consent. Guess what, if she was too incapacitated to give consent for photos during sex, how hard do you think it will be to prove they raped her without her consent?
Should be an interesting case.
Should be an interesting case.
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:22 pm to GeeOH
A woman getting drunk and getting in the car to spend the night with two guys show poor judgement.
The actions of the two men indicate a crime.
Poor judgement does not excuse the ones who commit a crime.
The actions of the two men indicate a crime.
Poor judgement does not excuse the ones who commit a crime.
This post was edited on 5/6/15 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:23 pm to mikrit54
Picture made me laugh. Golfers usually are smarter than this, but a mixture of alcohol and pussy is a powerful thing.This post was edited on 5/6/15 at 5:24 pm
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:24 pm to GeeOH
quote:Didn't click the link, but the story posted never mentioned anyone had sex between the three.
Has concensual sex (obviously since there's no rape charge) and then alleges rape because she sees a flash go off?
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:27 pm to joeyb147
Just in the OP she claims rape and then they say the photo was sexually explicit in nature.
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:28 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
20, of Medellin, Colombia
see. stop right here. what they should have done is just give this girl some of that good columbian toot and she would've let them take all the pictures they wanted and so much more.
just saying.
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:29 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:Well, most people aren't going to call the cops and claim they were just violated under video voyeurism. Rape would be the obvious complaint against such actions.
Just in the OP she claims rape and then they say the photo was sexually explicit in nature.
ETA: if she was only wearing a t-shirt, I'm not sure how the photos wouldn't be sexually explicit...
This post was edited on 5/6/15 at 5:32 pm
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:30 pm to CapstoneGrad06
quote:
According to a police report, the victim called police to report a rape.
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:37 pm to joeyb147
I'm not saying you're wrong, but i am interested to see how this plays out.
I think she claimed rape for a reason.
I think she claimed rape for a reason.
This post was edited on 5/6/15 at 5:38 pm
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:39 pm to CapstoneGrad06
Was one of them named FL_Gator?
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:40 pm to joeyb147
Ok Joey I am not going to get in an argument here. How a woman is just in a shirt for photos can be labeled sexually explicit is a stretch bro. 
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:42 pm to TexAgChill
No because it involved a woman. If the article would had said transvestite then you might be on to something.
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:44 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:Sexually explicit isn't constrained to intercourse or sexual acts. Nudity is also sexually explicit...
How a woman is just in a shirt for photos can be labeled sexually explicit is a stretch bro.
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:45 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
I am in the middle on this myself I think Joey makes a good point that nothing yet has claimed sex took place. However, if I were into putting puzzles together one can certainly assume sex happened.
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:46 pm to joeyb147
So then she wasn't in her shirt for the photos?
By the way, you and I disagree on what sexually explicit means.
According to lectlaw.com
SEXUALLY EXPLICIT CONDUCT
So the only thing that can come close is just the showing of the genitals in a lascivious way. There is nothing to suggest she wasn't wearing underwear with the shirt. I will agree with you that there are some unknowns but it doesn't look good for them either way. Although if rape isn't a charge will be a lot better.
By the way, you and I disagree on what sexually explicit means.
According to lectlaw.com
SEXUALLY EXPLICIT CONDUCT
quote:
Actual or simulated sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; bestiality; masturbation; sadistic or masochistic abuse; or lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person. 18 USC
So the only thing that can come close is just the showing of the genitals in a lascivious way. There is nothing to suggest she wasn't wearing underwear with the shirt. I will agree with you that there are some unknowns but it doesn't look good for them either way. Although if rape isn't a charge will be a lot better.
This post was edited on 5/6/15 at 5:53 pm
Posted on 5/6/15 at 5:52 pm to CapstoneGrad06
The dudes should have said they had her permission. Would have been their word against hers and they wouldnt have a problem.
Posted on 5/6/15 at 6:10 pm to Lordofwrath88
I can't imagine how many security cam and phone videos would have emerged with the clintons, kennedy's and even FDR's of years gone by.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News