Started By
Message
re: "Social justice" has gone too far!
Posted on 1/30/18 at 11:26 am to coachcrisp
Posted on 1/30/18 at 11:26 am to coachcrisp
quote:
some would consider minor indiscretion. Bluntly, he slept with one of his patients and has now lost his license to practice. The reportedly contentious medical review board made an example out of him.
So 7 years of medical training (or basic ethics) didn't impart that he shouldn't sleep with his patients?
Probably a good thing he's not going to be a doctor.
1
Posted on 1/30/18 at 11:27 am to coachcrisp
I laughed
Posted on 1/30/18 at 11:27 am to Vecchio Cane
its easy to be got w/how many idiots on this board would have actually defended a doctor sleeping with his patients. 
Posted on 1/30/18 at 11:27 am to coachcrisp
I laughed.
Posted on 1/30/18 at 11:28 am to bbrownso
quote:
So 7 years of medical training (or basic ethics) didn't impart that he shouldn't sleep with his patients?
Probably a good thing he's not going to be a doctor.
coachcrisp fishing with dynamite
Posted on 1/30/18 at 11:28 am to hawgfaninc
quote:
Always funnier when it is a TAMU fan talking about dicks.
Posted on 1/30/18 at 11:28 am to coachcrisp
Posted on 1/30/18 at 11:29 am to tOGLettuce
quote:
Glad you arnt my doctor.
Since when do doctors read a full chart? Its glance and go baw. Insurance will sort out the mistakes.
This post was edited on 1/30/18 at 11:31 am
Posted on 1/30/18 at 11:31 am to coachcrisp
quote:
he slept with one of his patients
Stopped here
ETA: I shouldn't have stopped. Didn't see that one coming. Well played OP
This post was edited on 1/30/18 at 11:33 am
Posted on 1/30/18 at 11:31 am to coachcrisp
Now I can upvote OP, at least. I was feeling kinda weird about it
Posted on 1/30/18 at 11:33 am to Dr RC
Well put doc lol
Posted on 1/30/18 at 11:34 am to Dr RC
quote:
its easy to be got w/how many idiots on this board would have actually defended a doctor sleeping with his patients
Yes. And being a vet barely matters to that crowd
This post was edited on 1/30/18 at 11:35 am
Posted on 1/30/18 at 11:34 am to coachcrisp
Solid
Posted on 1/30/18 at 11:48 am to coachcrisp
Posted on 1/30/18 at 12:01 pm to coachcrisp
This should be on the off topic board
Posted on 1/30/18 at 12:04 pm to coachcrisp
Oink oink splurt, oink oink splurt
Posted on 1/30/18 at 12:08 pm to volfan30
quote:
This offseason is shaping up to be the weirdest ever.
Already forming my top fetishes of 2018 thread right now. Hope you guys enjoy it.
Posted on 1/30/18 at 12:08 pm to coachcrisp
I am not a doctor but I am a lawyer. In the legal profession, in most jurisdictions, an attorney is subject to discipline if that attorney sleeps with a client that the attorney was not already sleeping with prior to representation. I believe that there is a rule similar to this one in a number of professions because a doctor, lawyer, or other professional usually assists clients/patients at a time in their lives when they are vulnerable. I hate SJW culture as much as the next guy, but I fail to see how this situation qualifies.
A real example of egregious social justice warrior policy would be how Title IX departments on university campuses are presently denying young men who are accused of sexual assault due process. Currently on college campuses the witch hunt against young men is real. And the administration often sides with the female making the accusation without allowing the accused to present evidence in his favor.
However, the example I just gave is different than the specific instance you stated because an ethical duty to not sleep with clients has existed in a number of professions for some time. If your friend's son was allowed to present evidence on his behalf, and it was found that he did in fact sleep with his patient, there's really nothing unjust about taking away his license. In law school, learning that it is inappropriate to sleep with clients where a prior sexual relationship was not established is literally the first thing you learn in your legal ethics course.
A real example of egregious social justice warrior policy would be how Title IX departments on university campuses are presently denying young men who are accused of sexual assault due process. Currently on college campuses the witch hunt against young men is real. And the administration often sides with the female making the accusation without allowing the accused to present evidence in his favor.
However, the example I just gave is different than the specific instance you stated because an ethical duty to not sleep with clients has existed in a number of professions for some time. If your friend's son was allowed to present evidence on his behalf, and it was found that he did in fact sleep with his patient, there's really nothing unjust about taking away his license. In law school, learning that it is inappropriate to sleep with clients where a prior sexual relationship was not established is literally the first thing you learn in your legal ethics course.
Posted on 1/30/18 at 12:10 pm to ZeusStamos
There is missing the joke, and then there's this
Posted on 1/30/18 at 12:10 pm to coachcrisp
It was a nice try but medical school is different than vet school. I will give you a pass on this one. As a Bama fan you probably know very little about higher education and that’s ok.
Page 2 of 7
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News