Started By
Message
Posted on 1/25/13 at 2:48 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Roger Klarvin
A&M can stay but can we get rid of Klarvin?
Posted on 1/25/13 at 2:51 pm to bama1959
quote:
The one with the most major NCAA infractions. That would be Auburn or Texas aTm who are tied for 3rd. Major NCAA Infractions List
FIFY.
I know how you Bama fans like to make up things but try not to lie and then provide a link that proves you’re a liar
This post was edited on 1/25/13 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 1/25/13 at 2:51 pm to DMagic
I know you have probably given up on the thread, but here it is
I absolutely love it. Getting a top 5 talent at 25 years old without giving up Graham, Teheran, and Simmons is robbery. It hurts losing Prado, but I don't think we were going to re-sign him, and if we did we'd probably have to overpay. Getting Johnson back is smart too.
I absolutely love it. Getting a top 5 talent at 25 years old without giving up Graham, Teheran, and Simmons is robbery. It hurts losing Prado, but I don't think we were going to re-sign him, and if we did we'd probably have to overpay. Getting Johnson back is smart too.
Posted on 1/25/13 at 2:55 pm to undecided
Mississippi State and Missouri
Posted on 1/25/13 at 3:00 pm to undecided
Missouri, not even a discussion.
Arkansas.
Arkansas.
Posted on 1/25/13 at 3:03 pm to SpartyGator
Yall need us more than we need yall.
Posted on 1/25/13 at 3:04 pm to RT1941
quote:
Pray tell, what competitive advantage would be gained by AU going to the East?
According to this article, entitled, "Alabama would support adding Missouri if those Tigers, not Auburn, play in the East" the REC felt that
quote:
Alabama, which resides in the SEC minority of wanting No. 14 from the East Coast, would support Missouri if it joined the SEC East, not the West, multiple sources said. According to the sources, Alabama has two objectives: Keep its annual cross-division rivalry game against Tennessee, and not watch Auburn move to the East and possibly grow its recruiting presence in talent-rich Florida and Georgia.
Posted on 1/25/13 at 3:09 pm to crispyUGA
quote:
Georgia, Auburn, Alabama, and Tennessee...so they can form the Big 4 Conference.
Yea, all 4 of those teams have won a BCS...wait, I mean all 4 of those teams have won a National Championship in the past 30 years...wait, I mean how bout a Big 3?!?!
Posted on 1/25/13 at 3:09 pm to Vepp
quote:
Vanderbilt and Missouri.
Kill yourself. ASAP.
Posted on 1/25/13 at 3:10 pm to Stripes314
I mean would the Big Ten have taken a Maryland if we were still on the table? I mean we already told them we wouldnt accept partial membership and Nebraska would. Even if the Pac-12 called UT again, you think they are taking UT,OU, kU, and Mizzou or UT, OU, OK Jr., and Taco Tech? Its not like we arent without options.
However, where would the SEC go to get to 16? You add a VA school and a NC school, then what? Who adds population to the map? West Virginia?
You are stuck with us because we will make you ALOT of money.
However, where would the SEC go to get to 16? You add a VA school and a NC school, then what? Who adds population to the map? West Virginia?
You are stuck with us because we will make you ALOT of money.
Posted on 1/25/13 at 3:11 pm to CockInYourEar
quote:
Yea, all 4 of those teams have won a BCS...wait, I mean all 4 of those teams have won a National Championship in the past 30 years...wait, I mean how bout a Big 3?!?!
And where's your Nattys?
Posted on 1/25/13 at 3:13 pm to dawg4lyfe
So much for southern hospitality.
Posted on 1/25/13 at 3:14 pm to Stripes314
quote:
mean would the Big Ten have taken a Maryland if we were still on the table? I mean we already told them we wouldnt accept partial membership and Nebraska would. Even if the Pac-12 called UT again, you think they are taking UT,OU, kU, and Mizzou or UT, OU, OK Jr., and Taco Tech? Its not like we arent without options.
However, where would the SEC go to get to 16? You add a VA school and a NC school, then what? Who adds population to the map? West Virginia?
You are stuck with us because we will make you ALOT of money.
CSB, but we're talking about reducing dead weight not adding it
Posted on 1/25/13 at 3:16 pm to undecided
If you are talking about reducing dead weight then you need to get rid of schools that add no population to the footprint. Schools that are #2 in their state. That list would not include Missouri, but would include yours.
Posted on 1/25/13 at 3:16 pm to reedus23
quote:
Auburn and Ole Miss because they offer nothing. Mizzou at least offers TV's in a market the SEC isn't in. The SEC already owns Alabama cuz of Bama and Mississippi cuz of MSU. So I see nothing Auburn or Ole Miss brings to the table.
:jeremiahjohnsongif:
Posted on 1/25/13 at 3:20 pm to KCM0Tiger
quote:
However, if you're going to kick one of the Mississppi schools out, the obvious choice is State. Ole Miss is the "name" school of Mississippi. I mean someone actually referred to Mississippi State as Landmass? What do they really bring to the conference?
They actually referred to the gulf coast as "the landmass". Neither State nor Ole Miss are anywhere near the coast.
But don't let logic stand in the way of your stupid-frick statement.
Posted on 1/25/13 at 3:23 pm to MaroonNation
This thread wasnt even a good troll. Complete fail on the OP's behalf.
Posted on 1/25/13 at 3:32 pm to undecided
quote:
not watch Auburn move to the East and possibly grow its recruiting presence in talent-rich Florida and Georgia.
Bama = scared of AU.
Kick their arse out. SEC is not for pussies and being scared of your rivals.
Posted on 1/25/13 at 3:33 pm to Stripes314
quote:
If you are talking about reducing dead weight then you need to get rid of schools that add no population to the footprint. Schools that are #2 in their state. That list would not include Missouri, but would include yours.
According to this article, Discover Card names Auburn fans the most loyal in college football. Auburn is also 7th in the nation and 5th in the 14 member SEC in total revenue.
Most importantly, we are the last team not named Alabama to win an NC and the only SEC team with 3 undefeated seasons since the 92 merger so I think we've pulled our weight
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News