Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/25/13 at 4:50 pm to undecided
quote:
Good luck and I hope we can still be friends
Sure, like we ever were. I get that you want Mizzou out for your own reasons, but you or no other fan/fan base has that option. Get over it....you'll be a happier person.
Posted on 1/25/13 at 4:50 pm to undecided
Mizzou and Arkansas
Posted on 1/25/13 at 4:53 pm to auzach91
You don't seem to grasp the fact that Mizzou is taking over this conference. We'll decide who stays and goes. Everyone can stay for now but Auburn is skating on thin ice.
Posted on 1/25/13 at 5:06 pm to undecided
I second the motion.
Posted on 1/25/13 at 5:08 pm to LandofDixie
quote:
Except for the BCS national championship win sum: $24,000,000 dollars that is distributed throughout the conference evenly. That's the thing we won in 2010. But whatever.
Great. So Auburn brought in $24,000,000 in 50 years assuming your figure is right. That amounts to $500,000 per year when broken out over the last 50 years since your last natty. Something tells me Mizzou, with a pathetic product as you say, will bring in more than $500,000 per year with our TV's. SEC already owns the state of Alabama because of Bama.
Posted on 1/25/13 at 5:32 pm to reedus23
quote:
Great. So Auburn brought in $24,000,000 in 50 years assuming your figure is right. That amounts to $500,000 per year when broken out over the last 50 years since your last natty. Something tells me Mizzou, with a pathetic product as you say, will bring in more than $500,000 per year with our TV's. SEC already owns the state of Alabama because of Bama.
Auburn brought 24 million to the conference for winning the 2010 BCS National Championship. We also won the 2004 Sugar Bowl (one of my fellow Aubies can give the dollar amount) which the SEC would have also received a payout for. We've been fairly consistent in Bowl game appearances since 92 which again brings revenue to the entire conference We're a Top 15 all-time program despite being in the same state as Alabama
This is what winning = revenue means but I'm sure this is a difficult concept for Mizzou fans to understand. Good try though, but the SECr has decided Mizzous out
Posted on 1/25/13 at 5:33 pm to BloodSweat&Beers
I think two of those things don't belong!
Posted on 1/25/13 at 5:35 pm to undecided
Arkansas and Missouri
Posted on 1/25/13 at 5:39 pm to undecided
mizzou and arky
Posted on 1/25/13 at 5:40 pm to 12Pence
Maybe the boogs will bring in a windfall with their championship in Track.
Oh,they now sux at that too .
Oh,they now sux at that too .
Posted on 1/25/13 at 5:44 pm to undecided
quote:
Auburn brought 24 million to the conference for winning the 2010 BCS National Championship. We also won the 2004 Sugar Bowl (one of my fellow Aubies can give the dollar amount) which the SEC would have also received a payout for. We've been fairly consistent in Bowl game appearances since 92 which again brings revenue to the entire conference We're a Top 15 all-time program despite being in the same state as Alabama
Mizzou's TV dollars > Auburn's bowl pay outs on a consistent basis.
Posted on 1/25/13 at 6:03 pm to undecided
This thread's real message:
We accept you A&M.
We accept you A&M.
Posted on 1/25/13 at 6:06 pm to KCM0Tiger
We're finally winning something!!
Good One!!
My vote would be the Whiny, big head Gumps!!
Good One!!
My vote would be the Whiny, big head Gumps!!
Posted on 1/25/13 at 6:14 pm to undecided
MSU would be the least valuble school in conference realignment money. Get rid of them and mizzou and add unc duke, UVA, and va tech. Best possible scenario for the SEC
Posted on 1/25/13 at 6:16 pm to cardboardboxer
quote:
This thread's real message:
We accept you A&M.
Poetry. I will be adding this to the OP
Posted on 1/25/13 at 6:22 pm to Herman Frisco
Holla at ya Mizzou and MSU
Posted on 1/25/13 at 6:23 pm to reedus23
quote:
Auburn and Ole Miss because they offer nothing. Mizzou at least offers TV's in a market the SEC isn't in. The SEC already owns Alabama cuz of Bama and Mississippi cuz of MSU. So I see nothing Auburn or Ole Miss brings to the table.
Like the SEC gives a flying frick about Missouri's market. Plus what does State and especially yall bring that we don't?Posted on 1/25/13 at 6:26 pm to undecided
Posted on 1/25/13 at 6:34 pm to cardboardboxer
Mizzou and Ky...basketball isn't a priority in the SEC..except of course this year
Page 6 of 8
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News