Started By
Message

re: SEC Goes Back to 12 Teams: Which 2 Do You Kick Out? (Mizzou 1st Team Out)

Posted on 1/25/13 at 1:48 pm to
Posted by LC412000
Any location where a plane flies
Member since Mar 2004
16673 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 1:48 pm to
There should be no conferences, no bowl tie ins. I need John Lennon to come back and write a song about it
Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 1:49 pm to
Mississippi State and Missouri
Posted by undecided
Member since May 2012
15492 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Auburn and LSU - The whining from the peanut gallery would decrease by 80% at least.

Which is why I have Alabama going indepedent; end result is the same

Also, Auburn has learned to ignore Alabama but LSU fans arent used to having a rival and are therefore more vocal
Posted by Pragmatic PiG
Plumas County
Member since Nov 2012
758 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 1:51 pm to
Lsu and Florida
Posted by undecided
Member since May 2012
15492 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Mississippi State

Sunbelt Champs
Posted by BigOrangeBri
Nashville- 4th & 19
Member since Jul 2012
12275 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 2:10 pm to
aTm and Mizzou. They don't belong.
Posted by KCM0Tiger
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2011
15512 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 2:11 pm to
We're finally winning something!!
Posted by beaverfever
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2008
32665 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 2:11 pm to
Mizzou and have OM/MSU consolidate their athletes and kick the loser out to cUSA or Sunbelt.
Posted by crispyUGA
Upstate SC
Member since Feb 2011
15919 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 2:13 pm to
Georgia, Auburn, Alabama, and Tennessee...so they can form the Big 4 Conference.
Posted by reedus23
St. Louis
Member since Sep 2011
25485 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 2:14 pm to
Auburn and Ole Miss because they offer nothing. Mizzou at least offers TV's in a market the SEC isn't in. The SEC already owns Alabama cuz of Bama and Mississippi cuz of MSU. So I see nothing Auburn or Ole Miss brings to the table.
Posted by KCM0Tiger
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2011
15512 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Auburn and Ole Miss because they offer nothing. Mizzou at least offers TV's in a market the SEC isn't in. The SEC already owns Alabama cuz of Bama and Mississippi cuz of MSU. So I see nothing Auburn or Ole Miss brings to the table.


Shhhhhh logic = bad in these parts

I'd kick out State and Auburn though
This post was edited on 1/25/13 at 2:19 pm
Posted by Boom Angry
Member since Jan 2013
1306 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 2:16 pm to
Mizzou and Arkansas can head back to the Big XII
Posted by BloodSweat&Beers
One Particular Harbor, Fl
Member since Jan 2012
9153 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

Georgia, Auburn, Alabama, and Tennessee...so they can form the Big 4 Conference.


One of these is not like the other. One of these things does not belong.
Posted by reedus23
St. Louis
Member since Sep 2011
25485 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

Mizzou and Arkansas can head back to the Big XII


Arky can't go back to the Big 12 because they were never in it in the first place.
Posted by KCM0Tiger
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2011
15512 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Arky can't go back to the Big 12 because they were never in it in the first place.


The inside joke on the rant is that Arky is a big 12 team. He's poking fun at them
Posted by DynastyDawg
Relf-Coast
Member since Jan 2013
10886 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Mississippi State

Sunbelt Champs



Remind me what Auburn is better at right now than State? ....
Posted by Boom Angry
Member since Jan 2013
1306 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Arky can't go back to the Big 12 because they were never in it in the first place.


But they were in the SWC which is close enough
Posted by undecided
Member since May 2012
15492 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Auburn and Ole Miss because they offer nothing. Mizzou at least offers TV's in a market the SEC isn't in. The SEC already owns Alabama cuz of Bama and Mississippi cuz of MSU. So I see nothing Auburn or Ole Miss brings to the table.

This is why you're being kicked out of the party Mizzou. I wont argue your point about Auburn becuase to an extent it's valid and Auburn would likely thrive in the ACC or even the SECe(thread for another day)

However, if you're going to kick one of the Mississppi schools out, the obvious choice is State. Ole Miss is the "name" school of Mississippi. I mean someone actually referred to Mississippi State as Landmass? What do they really bring to the conference?
Posted by The7Sins
Truth or Consequences, New Mexico
Member since Nov 2012
1178 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 2:23 pm to
Kentucky and Missouri. Neither state is in the south. It should a requirement to be in the south to be in the southeastern conference. So frick those damn yankees they should GTFO now.

To make up for the disparity move Bama And Auburn to the East and Vandy West to even the divisions.

(note The7Sins' definition of southern is your state must have sided with the confederacy during the civil war)
Posted by beaverfever
Little Rock
Member since Jan 2008
32665 posts
Posted on 1/25/13 at 2:24 pm to
Mississippi would be so much better off if they just had one major D1 program. They'd probably be pretty formidable.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter