Started By
Message

re: Rank the top 5 defenses going into 2013 (SEC related)

Posted on 5/15/13 at 7:33 pm to
Posted by nc14
La Jolla
Member since Jan 2012
28193 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 7:33 pm to
I would not go that far right now. Good is pretty certain, best is just a stretch at this point.
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 9:49 pm to
Kiper lists Reynolds and Richards and the #2 and #3 safeties in next year's draft making them his top safety duo in the country.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37613 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

1. Alabama - they have a lot of coaching continuity over the years, they have a lot of talent at all levels of the defense, and they've been #1 or close to it for years now.

2. Stanford - return most the two deep on a salty team that plays great defense in a conference of explosive offenses.

3. Michigan - Watch out for this defense to be really good next year. They were young, and didn't have a lot of depth last year and still ranked in the top 15 in total defense. Greg Mattison is really good, and this defense will be better this year.

4. Florida - They have a deep and athletic DL, and a lot of speed at LB. The secondary may be one of the better units in the country again. This will be another tough unit from Florida.

5. LSU - They have coaching consistency on defense, on of the better DC's in the business, and a ton of talent, especially on the back end. If even one pass rusher emerges, this will be a top 5 unit.


Not that I disagree with you, it's actually pretty good, but there are one or two things that have me scratching my head, so I must ask ...

1 - Bama, agree completely. Perhaps not #1 but certainly Top Five.

2 - Stanford ... yes, the PAC 12 makes them look very good. But put them against a pound-it-out offense and I think they might not look so good. But they will be very very decent, Top Ten at least.

3 - Meeshegan. I love'em, I do, but forget about last year unless you want to admit they gave up more big plays than any team in America last year. Great defenses do not do that. You need only watch a replay of the Outback Bowl vs South Carolina to understand from where I am coming with this observation.

4 - Florida, you mentioned Bama having continuity on their staff, yet you failed to mention UF's lack of continuity on their staff? How many new coaches do that have on that staff, on the D side of the ball this year? Brad Lawing is an exception coach and you have talent ... so Top Five definitely.

5 - LSU, hard to argue with what you typed about LSU.

The, my next question would be, why the diss on SCAR? What negatives, what do you find lacking, in what SCAR returns this season? Perhaps one of the finest DLines in the country in years. A young, but very very talented secondary. LBs are a question mark but they've recruited well there. All but one Defensive coach returns, (Brad Lawing), and he was replaced by Deke Adams who guided UNC's DLine to be one of the best in the country when they least expected it. So why the diss on SCAR? Just wondering - or more wanting, to see how SCAR's D is perceived by you, our negatives, what we are lacking, etc. Thanks in advance. :D

Eta: Both of our DEs are listed on everyone's Top Twenty SEC players selected in next year's draft, and some even have Kelcey Quarles, our junior DT listed as well.

This post was edited on 5/15/13 at 10:54 pm
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

But put them against a pound-it-out offense and I think they might not look so good.


quote:

there are one or two things that have me scratching my head


Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140369 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 11:06 pm to
IIRC we only have one new coach on the D. Not sure about the questions about continuity.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37613 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 11:28 pm to
quote:

IIRC we only have one new coach on the D. Not sure about the questions about continuity.


Thanks.

Who replaces the coach that just resigned? I thought Lawing replaced someone else that left at the end of the season and that y'all just hired someone else to fill the opening by the guy who just recently resigned? What was his name, Bryant Young maybe? I thought Lawing replaced Dan Quinn? Was one of them maybe connected to the Auburn scandal or something? I cannot remember, but I seem to recall hearing some talk about that or something?
Posted by Wrenchruh
Parts Unknown
Member since Sep 2012
2413 posts
Posted on 5/15/13 at 11:35 pm to
quote:

1. Dylan 2. Dylan 3. Dylan 4. Dylan 5. Dylan


This was the only correct answer. Congrats. The Internet is yours.





























I spit hot fiyah!
Posted by PepaSpray
Adamantium Membership
Member since Aug 2012
11080 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 6:43 am to
quote:

Lobotomy - I don't know if A&M is going to be fighting the same upward battle as Oregon because of temp on offense. Oregon is very underrated on defense because of the depth it requires with our tempo.
so you're saying up-tempo offenses do not win championships? You're saying that well balanced ball control offenses with strong defenses win championships?

You didn't have to tell us that. Alabama made it obvious.
Posted by wolfgang
Baton Rouge and Los Angeles
Member since Jan 2007
1898 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 6:46 am to
bs
Posted by geauxcoco
Greenville, SC
Member since Apr 2007
11023 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 6:47 am to
LSU should definitely be top 5.

Like the Chief said earlier this week...."players leave, tradition doesn't....I'm still here"

Our starting D is as good as anyone in the country, Chiefs biggest challenge will be to get the back ups ready
Posted by CrimsonChin
the gutter.
Member since Feb 2010
5857 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 9:16 am to
Bama always has the top defense year in and year out despite losing multiple player to the draft so my guess is:

1. Bama
2. USC
3. LSU
4. Georgia
5. Florida

I know I only listed SEC teams because these other guys just don't play defense like we do.
Posted by slayerxing
Gainesville
Member since Feb 2010
11045 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Not that I disagree with you, it's actually pretty good, but there are one or two things that have me scratching my head, so I must ask ...

1 - Bama, agree completely. Perhaps not #1 but certainly Top Five.

2 - Stanford ... yes, the PAC 12 makes them look very good. But put them against a pound-it-out offense and I think they might not look so good. But they will be very very decent, Top Ten at least.

3 - Meeshegan. I love'em, I do, but forget about last year unless you want to admit they gave up more big plays than any team in America last year. Great defenses do not do that. You need only watch a replay of the Outback Bowl vs South Carolina to understand from where I am coming with this observation.

4 - Florida, you mentioned Bama having continuity on their staff, yet you failed to mention UF's lack of continuity on their staff? How many new coaches do that have on that staff, on the D side of the ball this year? Brad Lawing is an exception coach and you have talent ... so Top Five definitely.

5 - LSU, hard to argue with what you typed about LSU.

The, my next question would be, why the diss on SCAR? What negatives, what do you find lacking, in what SCAR returns this season? Perhaps one of the finest DLines in the country in years. A young, but very very talented secondary. LBs are a question mark but they've recruited well there. All but one Defensive coach returns, (Brad Lawing), and he was replaced by Deke Adams who guided UNC's DLine to be one of the best in the country when they least expected it. So why the diss on SCAR? Just wondering - or more wanting, to see how SCAR's D is perceived by you, our negatives, what we are lacking, etc. Thanks in advance. :D

Eta: Both of our DEs are listed on everyone's Top Twenty SEC players selected in next year's draft, and some even have Kelcey Quarles, our junior DT listed as well.


Michigan gave up a lot of big plays last year but they did not have a lot of depth or experience. They will have a lot more of both going into this next year. And even with the surrendering of big plays, they hung in the top 25 of total and scoring defense all year. Plus they have a very strong DC in Mattison. One of the best IMO.

Stanford's weakness has been pass defense - which I think will be stronger this year, up front, I think they could give anyone trouble. That's a tough unit.

Florida lost a couple of coaches on defense, but considering who they have added, and since that is Muschamp's strength, I think that they will continue to be very strong, especially with the talent at the back end and the names they have on the DL. The only question is LB, and if one more LB emerges, Florida could be one of the better units in the country.

South Carolina has a really good defense and has for a few years now. They have a chance at top 5 if they can be a little bit more consistent in their pass defense than they were last year. They were #11 in total d and #13 in scoring d last year. It's a good unit, and arguably could be included.

LSU has ranked consistently better the last few years though, and I think Florida has a higher ceiling this year because of their ability to force turnovers and get off the field on third down.

I'm really splitting hairs though. South Carolina will be a good defense again.
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

so you're saying up-tempo offenses do not win championships? You're saying that well balanced ball control offenses with strong defenses win championships? You didn't have to tell us that. Alabama made it obvious.


The correlation to Championships is personnel driven, imo. Auburn 2010 is a prime example of that because no one could stop CAM. Although I believe Oregon's style of play could win championships, I honestly prefer Stanford's style of play over Oregon's. Although, I believe Oregon's innovative approach is the only way for them to get quality recruits. Stanford can recruit nationwide and grab elite SEC talent based on their University. With Nike, our business program, the unis, etc. it would be detrimental to change to a ball control, ground and pound approach.
Posted by joeytiger
Muh Mom's House
Member since Jul 2012
6037 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 1:36 pm to
1. South Carolina
2. Bama
3. Ohio St.
4. Florida
5. LSU (Chavis always has a good D)
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

I don't see that depth that would make them an elite group, but again I'm fairly ignorant on their individual talent.


Here is another big board with Murphy in the first round.
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
45213 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 8:35 pm to
Florida fap thread
Posted by 167back
Dos Gris
Member since Jun 2012
4698 posts
Posted on 5/16/13 at 10:20 pm to
FYI

LSU's defense forced MORE turnovers in '12 than what the gators defense did.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter