Started By
Message

re: Questions for Ole Miss fans about NCAA

Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:01 pm to
Posted by Tuscaloosa
11x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
46603 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

The head coach's tenure ended the same way - in a sex scandal mostly unrelated to the NCAA issues.


DuBose's sex scandal occurred prior to the 1999 season. He was fired for getting shut out by Southern Miss at home a couple weeks after dropping the season opener to UCLA in 2000 - a year that we were expected to compete for a national championship.
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

You aren't being treated unfairly. Your school violated rules like most do, but the difference is you did it at a different level and did it WHILE under investigation.

At what different level? What did OM do that is at a different level than others?
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

Unfortunately for OM, you are going to get hit very hard b/c if you don't, then schools like Bama, LSU, AU, UGA who have the ability to recover much faster from sanctions than OM does will start to wonder "why not us too then?

"Why not us", comes from an idea that those others schools aren't giving rides to kids or letting their family stay at hotels for free. What in OM allegations do you believe schools aren't currently doing?
Posted by Tuscaloosa
11x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
46603 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:14 pm to
The 5 figure cash payments, for one. I don't believe many programs are doing that.

Paying players to take visits and cancel official visits to other schools is another habit other schools don't mess with - and most of that wasn't even listed in the NOA.
This post was edited on 8/10/17 at 12:16 pm
Posted by peepingcrxxms
Sumrall, MS
Member since Aug 2016
848 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:15 pm to
If you think Ole Miss presented enough holes in Leo's testimony to make him unreliable you should read (for the first time because I'm quite sure you haven't already or you wouldn't have this ignorant opinion) the facts that the NCAA released on that testimony yesterday. It's very obvious who is lying and it isn't Leo Lewis.
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

Since Billy Brewer left, the median number of wins for an OM season is 7. The mean average is 6.3. Go back to the end of the Vaught era and those numbers drop to a flat 6 for both mean and median.

Yes, if you assume OM goes to the mean and hires bad coaches, which is possible. I am assuming they don't if they get just a 1 year ban. OM recruits in the top 20 with Tubby, O, Nutt and Freeze. If they are decent coaches like Freeze and Tubby they will win (Tubby was under harsh sanctions). But yes, if its a Matt Luke or a mediocre to bad coach then OM will win 6-7 games.
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

The 5 figure cash payments, for one. I don't believe many programs are doing that.

You are saying most programs aren't doing this when the one kid who pointed out a 5 figure payment, cant prove it, didn't go to OM, and admitted taking money from other schools. Dude
This post was edited on 8/10/17 at 12:21 pm
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

DuBose's sex scandal occurred prior to the 1999 season. He was fired for getting shut out by Southern Miss at home a couple weeks after dropping the season opener to UCLA in 2000 - a year that we were expected to compete for a national championship.


I guess my memory is fading. I thought they settled between the 1999 & 2000 seasons.

Still, I think the parallels between our 99/2000 situation and where OM is right now are uncanny.
Posted by Tuscaloosa
11x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
46603 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

You are saying most programs aren't doing this


Correct.
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

If you think Ole Miss presented enough holes in Leo's testimony to make him unreliable you should read (for the first time because I'm quite sure you haven't already or you wouldn't have this ignorant opinion) the facts that the NCAA released on that testimony yesterday. It's very obvious who is lying and it isn't Leo Lewis.

Help us out with that. OM fans say LL lied about Rebel Rags and mentioned having bags of cash from the attorney given 10K can fit in one hand. What was in the response, to a bias simpleton like myself what was in the response that proves we lied and he is telling the truth.
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

Correct.

So this kid committed to Bama, OM and State, admits he took money from other programs, another being LSU and you are still going to sit there and say that OM does something most others don't do. We are talking about the SEC and not all fbs programs right?
Posted by Tuscaloosa
11x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
46603 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

I guess my memory is fading. I thought they settled between the 1999 & 2000 seasons.


I believe it was made public in the spring/summer of 1999, and they settled immediately prior to the '99 season. They axed his remaining contract, and he basically was coaching for his job the rest of the season. Winning the SEC was probably the only thing that would have saved him, and that somehow miraculously happened.

quote:

Still, I think the parallels between our 99/2000 situation and where OM is right now are uncanny.


I agree, especially the way the fans and even beat writers have handled it.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64550 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

But punishing kids who had nothing to do with this is why the ncaa is viewed so negatively.

If they add another year to the bowl ban, underclassmen are allowed to transfer without penalty. The NCAA is punishing the program. The kids, unfortunately are collateral damage, but the NCAA gives them that loophole to try to mitigate the damages to the kids.
quote:

If OM gets a 1 year bowl ban then it wont take anytime to recover.

Not if you have severe scholarship reductions. Hard to field a competitive football team with 50 scholarship players
quote:

If its a 2 year bowl ban then it will take a minimum of 3 years before we can field a legit 8-9 win team

again, you're totally discounting the scholarship reductions that will happen. That hurts a program more than any other penalty the NCAA assesses
Posted by Tuscaloosa
11x Award Winning SECRant user
Member since Dec 2011
46603 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

So this kid committed to Bama, OM and State, admits he took money from other programs, another being LSU and you are still going to sit there and say that OM does something most others don't do. We are talking about the SEC and not all fbs programs right?


Based on my experiences, yes, that's what I'm saying. I began my professional career as a HS football coach in the state of Mississippi. I saw it happen. Kirby Smart at Alabama arranging for a recruit's family to have a rental car paid for. Ole Miss giving out thousands of dollars for a recruit to cancel a visit to another school.

Every single program in the SEC is dirty to some extent - including Bama, LSU, etc... but I've never seen anything like what I saw going on with Ole Miss. Just blatant, in your face cheating, with no real attempt to cover it up or keep it quiet. Wild.
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

again, you're totally discounting the scholarship reductions that will happen. That hurts a program more than any other penalty the NCAA assesses

I said minimum of 3 years. And we have already taken 8 scholarships the past two years. So lets say they hit us with 20, which is a ton, we would only need to take 12 more out, which is having a roster of 81 instead of 85. It hurts yes, but its not as crippling as another bowl ban. But once again, I said minimum of 3 years.
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

Yes, if you assume OM goes to the mean and hires bad coaches, which is possible. I am assuming they don't if they get just a 1 year ban. OM recruits in the top 20 with Tubby, O, Nutt and Freeze. If they are decent coaches like Freeze and Tubby they will win (Tubby was under harsh sanctions). But yes, if its a Matt Luke or a mediocre to bad coach then OM will win 6-7 games.


No. Once again, the numbers show a different reality. Here are the average wins per year for every OM coach since Vaught.

Kinard 5
Cooper 5.25
Sloan 4
Brewer 6.2
Tuberville 6.5
Cutcliffe 7.3
Orgeron 3.33
Nutt 6
Freeze 7.8

The simple fact is that historically, at OM

A bad coach wins 3-4 games a year.
A mediocre coach wins 5-6.
A really good coach wins 6-7.
A really good coach that cheats his arse off will get close to 8.

Not a single one of them, including the 'cheat your arse off' one gets to 8-9 wins as a standard benchmark.
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

I agree, especially the way the fans and even beat writers have handled it.


matthew25 would have been embarrassed at the amount of sunshine I was pumping.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64550 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

So lets say they hit us with 20, which is a ton, we would only need to take 12 more out, which is having a roster of 81 instead of 85. It hurts yes, but its not as crippling as another bowl ban. But once again, I said minimum of 3 years.

USC was given a scholarship reduction of 30 over 3 years. That should be more what you're expecting. I was over-exaggerating. You'll have more in the 65-70 range if you get similar reductions, which you probably will. Playing with 65-70 scholarship players is not easy when everyone else is playing with 85. It was hard for a program like USC, and Ole Miss does not attract recruits like USC does.
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

. Ole Miss giving out thousands of dollars for a recruit to cancel a visit to another school.

Yet we loose top targets to Starkville and others every single year. You would rather believe that kids turn down money to live in Starkville. Blind
quote:

Every single program in the SEC is dirty to some extent - including Bama, LSU, etc... but I've never seen anything like what I saw going on with Ole Miss. Just blatant, in your face cheating, with no real attempt to cover it up or keep it quiet. Wild.

The ncaa was at OM doorstep for 5 years. They didn't come up with a single pay for play allegation until Laremy's step fathers snitched on him and got him for $800. The investigation is over by proof of the first noa and then draft night happens which forces the ncaa to take a players word who went to a rival school. OM is so wild and crazy that it took 5 years two snitches to allege 16K in pay for play.

Once again you would rather believe OM cheats like wild yet loose kids to places like MSU, you know the last school who got busted for cheating and actual cheating like pay for play and not rides and hotel rooms, you'd rather believe they turn down money then realize when every single kid at bama flashes wads of cash and all have the exact same new camera or charger that OM is the only one doing this. And OM is so wild and crazy, but it took them 5 years and rival schools snitching to find any pay for play. I know you don't believe this.
This post was edited on 8/10/17 at 12:40 pm
Posted by Billy Mays
Member since Jan 2009
25276 posts
Posted on 8/10/17 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

If you think Ole Miss presented enough holes in Leo's testimony to make him unreliable you should read (for the first time because I'm quite sure you haven't already or you wouldn't have this ignorant opinion) the facts that the NCAA released on that testimony yesterday. It's very obvious who is lying and it isn't Leo Lewis.


quote:

Mississippi St. Fan


You are a good source for unbiased information on the subject. I should listen to you (MS fan), Steve Robertson (MS fan), Dan Wolken (cuck for the NCAA), and Leo Lewis (current MS player and former recruit everyone knew had hands out) for factual updates only.

How much did you pay for your copy of "Flim Flam" btw? I hope you plan on using it as a toilet book, although it may look nice on the coffee table in your trailer...
This post was edited on 8/10/17 at 12:41 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter