Started By
Message
re: Paul Finebaum says a major NCAA investigation is ongoing at Auburn...
Posted on 1/29/11 at 11:30 am to Monticello
Posted on 1/29/11 at 11:30 am to Monticello
quote:
These two have been the most accurate sources on all things Camgate.
0
Posted on 1/29/11 at 12:02 pm to Rock Hardwell
quote:
Rock Hardwell
You set up an alter and this is the best name you can come up with?
Posted on 1/29/11 at 12:15 pm to Rock Hardwell
USC called..they said these "investigations" are severely underrated.
Posted on 1/29/11 at 12:18 pm to Rock Hardwell
I don't have any idea how deep any investigation is, but I do know it's not closed.
Posted on 1/29/11 at 12:18 pm to Rock Hardwell
FWIW, I believe the OP.
Posted on 1/29/11 at 12:35 pm to Ice Cold
Haven't read this thread, but anyone who knows anyone involved would know that there is still an investigation going on. There will be one until the NCAA says publicly that either a) there will be a formal letter of inquiry or b) there is no wrongdoing.
B has not occurred.
B has not occurred.
Posted on 1/29/11 at 12:38 pm to Bellabama
Worst that could happen is the say Cam shouldn't have played
But like Finebaum said the other day, AU is not USC, USC only had to vacate bc they were so uncooperative
But like Finebaum said the other day, AU is not USC, USC only had to vacate bc they were so uncooperative
Posted on 1/29/11 at 12:38 pm to beaver
quote:We'll see. If the rumors are true, Auburn's offense is much more severe than SC's. That's a big if though.
But like Finebaum said the other day, AU is not USC, USC only had to vacate bc they were so uncooperative
Posted on 1/29/11 at 12:39 pm to beaver
quote:
Worst that could happen is the say Cam shouldn't have played
umm.. no sir.
quote:
USC only had to vacate bc they were so uncooperative
umm.. again.. no sir.
Posted on 1/29/11 at 12:41 pm to ohiovol
quote:
, Auburn's offense is much more severe than SC's
Lulz
What!?!?
Seriously, I have close, good friends on the team....180k-200k did not exchange hands
I'm sure some money did but no more than what happens at all schools
Posted on 1/29/11 at 12:44 pm to beaver
No. That's not the worst thing, beaver. Worst thing is that they told Auburn to play him at their own risk, but that if they found information that would render him ineligible, Auburn would suffer a greater punishment.
Auburn fans assume, incorrectly, that eligibility granted for 2 games implies that he will be found eligible for the entire year.
If the NCAA had intended that to be the case, they would have included that in their decision. See the Alabama textbook scandal for clarification.
Finally, unless anyone on this thread knows anyone involved, what they say is pure speculation. If anyone knows anyone involved, they certainly aren't going to say who or what they know.
Auburn fans assume, incorrectly, that eligibility granted for 2 games implies that he will be found eligible for the entire year.
If the NCAA had intended that to be the case, they would have included that in their decision. See the Alabama textbook scandal for clarification.
Finally, unless anyone on this thread knows anyone involved, what they say is pure speculation. If anyone knows anyone involved, they certainly aren't going to say who or what they know.
Posted on 1/29/11 at 12:46 pm to Alahunter
quote:
umm.. again.. no sir.
lol.
come on beaver, i know you've paid more attention to this shite than that!
Posted on 1/29/11 at 12:46 pm to Alahunter
Is there a link supporting that Finebaum actual made this statement or is this thread just AU/UA pissing match number 250 for the week?
Posted on 1/29/11 at 12:46 pm to beaver
quote:
Worst that could happen is the say Cam shouldn't have played
Umm, so that means he would be ineligible correct, meaning AU played with an ineligible player right?
Yeah, I think AU would have it pretty dang bad if that statement comes out and all those "W" on the records are gone.
Posted on 1/29/11 at 12:46 pm to marshallcotiger
quote:
Is there a link supporting that Finebaum actual made this statement or is this thread just AU/UA pissing match number 250 for the week?
i doubt anyone recorded the radio show and is able to share the audio link.
Posted on 1/29/11 at 12:47 pm to beaver
I don't think people on the Auburn football team are the people who are going to give credible information.
Anyone involved is bound by confidentiality.
Anyone involved is bound by confidentiality.
Posted on 1/29/11 at 12:47 pm to marshallcotiger
250(b)
Posted on 1/29/11 at 12:47 pm to Bellabama
quote:
No. That's not the worst thing, beaver. Worst thing is that they told Auburn to play him at their own risk, but that if they found information that would render him ineligible, Auburn would suffer a greater punishment.
Auburn fans assume, incorrectly, that eligibility granted for 2 games implies that he will be found eligible for the entire year.
If the NCAA had intended that to be the case, they would have included that in their decision. See the Alabama textbook scandal for clarification.
Finally, unless anyone on this thread knows anyone involved, what they say is pure speculation. If anyone knows anyone involved, they certainly aren't going to say who or what they know.
Exactly!
Posted on 1/29/11 at 12:48 pm to m2pro
quote:
i doubt anyone recorded the radio show and is able to share the audio link.
How about the name of the radio show?
Posted on 1/29/11 at 12:49 pm to Bellabama
Bella, I like you as a poster, but y'all can cope with us winning the NC however you want, I can only tell you it wOnt be vacated
Page 3 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News