Started By
Message
re: North Carolina lawmakers threaten to pull UNC and NC State from ACC
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:34 am to Tillman
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:34 am to Tillman
quote:
UNC doesn't make money for Clemson. i know that much.
Yes they do : NCAA credits are a huge bonus for all ACC schools
The fact you do not know this supports your alter status or you lying about being a Tater grad.
quote:
what is your obsession with AAU schools.
Not my obsession, most college presidents and college BoD's would give their left nut for AAU membership.
Again, if you are a college graduate of any school how you do not know this is beyond belief.
Alter status confirmed
1
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:36 am to Tillman
quote:
UNC doesn't make money for Clemson. i know that much.
Pretty sure UNC basketball is a big draw for the ACC television contract. In that sense, yes, UNC makes money for Clemson.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:37 am to Cheese Grits
AAU might be a brag for a college, however, i do not see it is something your average college student and graduate cares about. lol it has nothing to do with the quality of the professors and programs at a university.
CLemson is ranked much higher than Iowa State in US News, yet CU is not AAU but Iowa State is.
so obviously what schools are best is a subjective exercise.
Clemson is ranked in the highest classification by Carnegie for research universities.
CLemson is ranked much higher than Iowa State in US News, yet CU is not AAU but Iowa State is.
so obviously what schools are best is a subjective exercise.
Clemson is ranked in the highest classification by Carnegie for research universities.
This post was edited on 4/12/17 at 11:39 am
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:39 am to pvilleguru
quote:
retty sure UNC basketball is a big draw for the ACC television contract. In that sense, yes, UNC makes money for Clemson.
i don't think so. every ACC school provides content. UNC has to play against somebody.
This post was edited on 4/12/17 at 11:41 am
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:39 am to BowlJackson
I will take N.Carolina
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:41 am to Tillman
Without UNC, the TV contract wouldn't be woth as much, so yeah. Not as many people are going to tune in to watch Clemson vs. Miami in basketball.
This post was edited on 4/12/17 at 11:42 am
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:42 am to PNW
quote:Then you'd be assuming wrong. The NC television market is huge and their prestige would be a welcomed edition...can you imagine a UNC/Kentucky conference basketball rivalry?
Ethics and all, I would assume the SEC wants no part of what the state of North Carolina has to offer.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:42 am to Tillman
quote:
i don't think so. every ACC school provides content. UNC has to play against somebody.
So a Clemson-Miami basketball game is going to draw as many viewers as Clemson-UNC? Yeah, okay bud
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:42 am to pvilleguru
quote:
Without UNC, the TV contract wouldn't be woth as much, so yeah.
ok, i think it has more to do with collection of schools in ACC, not one program. i don't think ton of non-UNC fans view UNC bball as appointment viewing. lol
This post was edited on 4/12/17 at 11:43 am
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:43 am to Tillman
Both Arkansas and SCar have had top 5 teams fairly recently. Mizzou has two division titles in the East, and A&M just built a palace, and is a decent coach away from being a top team.
What are you talking about? That said, UNC is firmly a basketball school, with a sports program that is all around one of the best in the country. Even if UNC becomes a middle of the road FB team like it is now, it is still a valuable product.
What are you talking about? That said, UNC is firmly a basketball school, with a sports program that is all around one of the best in the country. Even if UNC becomes a middle of the road FB team like it is now, it is still a valuable product.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:44 am to Tillman
quote:
ok, i think it has more to do with collection of schools in ACC, not one program. i don't think ton of non-UNC fans view UNC bball as appointment viewing. lol
If you do not get why UNC is important to the ACC no one will be able to help you.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:44 am to Tillman
quote:
UNC doesn't make money for Clemson. i know that much.
quote:
The Atlantic Coast Conference and the town of Chapel Hill are sharing in the success of UNC's men's basketball national title win April 3, with money pouring in as a result of the victory.
UNC will bring in money from the win due to advertising and the projected increase in brand strength — and the entire ACC will receive money for the win from the NCAA.
UNC Title - $$$
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:44 am to BowlJackson
quote:
o a Clemson-Miami basketball game is going to draw as many viewers as Clemson-UNC? Yeah, okay bud
i think the viewership is based on the rankings on the teams that season. two ranked teams more likely to be viewed, partly b/c those games get the prime time spots.
i don't think a Clemson-UNC game in which Clemson was not ranked would have high viewership.
This post was edited on 4/12/17 at 11:45 am
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:45 am to Montezuma
UNC also had one of the greatest linebackers of all time play for them.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:45 am to Tillman
quote:
i don't think ton of non-UNC fans view UNC bball as appointment viewing
Maybe not, but they are more likely to come across it and stay on the channel. They have a lot of fans and a lot of people that want to see them lose.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:45 am to Tillman
quote:
if being in SEC didn't kickstart several SEC team football programs, like SC, why would it do that for UNC.
That is not particularly true. Yes, USC is down at the moment but any school where the head coach basically coasts to retirement for a couple of years, like Spurrier did, is going to see a steep drop off.
It was not that long ago that SC was winning 11 games a season and thumping their in state rival. As I am sure you can attest too.
Sure, they have some rebuilding to do but I would be surprised if USC doesn't return to respectable status soon and possible move back to elite.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:45 am to Tillman
quote:
Clemson is ranked in the highest classification by Carnegie for research universities.
You keep saying this but do you know what it really means?
Pretty much every P5 school out there is a Carnegie I school. Congrats on being a P5 state school?
Ole Miss is a Carnegie I
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:45 am to scrooster
quote:
Show some fricking morals and abandon the Charlie Sheen mentality.
Sleeping with big-tittied skinny-ankled babes can still give you stuff that Ajax will not scrub off. UNCheat is loaded with STDs ... we should avoid them at all costs. They bring zero value to the SEC in the the long run and I seriously doubt UT, UGA, UF and SC would allow them to be voted-in in the first place. We've all had behind the scenes run-ins with them over the years on the recruiting trails ... they're skankier than Lindsay Lohan.
That is why the SEC will pimp UNC out. Mo Money, Mo Money, Mo Money
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:46 am to pvilleguru
you ought to apply for a marketing job at UNC. you seem to enjoy promoting UNC. lol
Posted on 4/12/17 at 11:46 am to Cheese Grits
Auburn and alabama are level 2. that has to hurt your argument b/c we know you are fanboy of the alabama schools.
Page 4 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News