Started By
Message
re: NCAA Tournament Selection - SEC
Posted on 3/14/16 at 5:43 pm to MeatPants
Posted on 3/14/16 at 5:43 pm to MeatPants
I just checked that bracket matrix thing that shows all the resident "bracketologists". There were 144 total done and one dude had Tulsa. Which I'm sure it was dj dawg using his luck criteria
128 had st Bonnie's, 47 had Carolina, 61 had Monmouth, etc. Tulsa might seriously be the worst or most undeserving decision ever made by the committee.
This was a new guy this year right? What a terrible job.
128 had st Bonnie's, 47 had Carolina, 61 had Monmouth, etc. Tulsa might seriously be the worst or most undeserving decision ever made by the committee.
This was a new guy this year right? What a terrible job.
This post was edited on 3/14/16 at 5:48 pm
0
Posted on 3/14/16 at 5:56 pm to MeatPants
quote:
They fared better against tourney teams.
Dj what point have you made all day. You haven't responded to shite. To be honest the only point you made is luck is a criteria
Do you basketball dj? I do like the trolling of the gamecocks though. Because you've pretty much avoided everything else debated by Hawkeye and I
Record vs tourney teams isn't relevant to the selection process.
Other Points I have made include:
1. Record vs top 50 is a key component.
2. SOS is a key component
3. You haven't said how tulsas resume lags behind sc's.
4. You can't ignore games that come down lucky last second shots.
5. Head to heads are irrelevant.
Hawkeye and myself share similar points, so no clue what that comment Is supposed to mean.
Posted on 3/14/16 at 6:04 pm to Hawgeye
Hawgeye slang dick on this thread.
Carolina fans don't know how the tournament works. That's pretty mid-major of you guys.
Posted on 3/14/16 at 6:27 pm to CtotheVrzrbck
I pretty much said Tulsa and South Carolina don't belong in the tourney. The only thing I've debated with Hawkeye was is the clause of top 50 wins as the only criteria. Then I listed other criteria that matters that people that know this system better than you and I do
In which out of 144 of those people have backed the idea that Tulsa belongs nowhere near this tourney. Which you still haven't responded to yet
No I do love a good rant style troll from Hawkeye and you and you have gotten under the gamecock fans skins. It's worked. But in ppm a neutral and it doesn't bother me. Line I said there is a legit debate between a lot of teams and Tulsa (and that includes Carolina) and a lot of neutrals who do this with more expertise agree with me and not you. Sorry but that is a fact. Doesn't mean I'm right or your wrong or the other way around. It's subjective. And we can leave it at that
Personally I think Carolina and Tulsa don't belong but if you are picking between two turds. south Carolina is a better team and that sure as hell is a criteria
In which out of 144 of those people have backed the idea that Tulsa belongs nowhere near this tourney. Which you still haven't responded to yet
No I do love a good rant style troll from Hawkeye and you and you have gotten under the gamecock fans skins. It's worked. But in ppm a neutral and it doesn't bother me. Line I said there is a legit debate between a lot of teams and Tulsa (and that includes Carolina) and a lot of neutrals who do this with more expertise agree with me and not you. Sorry but that is a fact. Doesn't mean I'm right or your wrong or the other way around. It's subjective. And we can leave it at that
Personally I think Carolina and Tulsa don't belong but if you are picking between two turds. south Carolina is a better team and that sure as hell is a criteria
Posted on 3/14/16 at 6:31 pm to MeatPants
And why the hell am I the defender of gamecocks virtues. Ive been ripping on them for a damn couple of weeks now. The rant can really turn shite around. But Georgia fans are just getting salty because thy thought they had a chance too when they were a joke too
But if Tulsa got in anyone has a beef. There had to be politics of them getting left out last year
But if Tulsa got in anyone has a beef. There had to be politics of them getting left out last year
Posted on 3/14/16 at 6:45 pm to MeatPants
I know it isn't supposed to matter to the committee at all, but what Haith did at Miami and Missouri, combined with Tulsa's extremely lackluster credentials, should have been more than enough to leave them out. If Louisville hadn't self imposed a ban, they'd be playing right now too. It's disgusting. NCAA continues to give zero motivation for teams to play by the rules. St. Bonaventure should have gotten that bid.
Posted on 3/14/16 at 6:50 pm to CidCock
The SEC has been overall quite terrible in basketball and has been for the past few seasons, including this one.
It sucks, but it's the truth.
It sucks, but it's the truth.
Posted on 3/14/16 at 7:21 pm to MeatPants
quote:
And why the hell am I the defender of gamecocks virtues.
Beats me.
quote:
But Georgia fans are just getting salty because thy thought they had a chance too when they were a joke too
I gave up hope for a bid when we lost to a shite Auburn team. Our only chance was to win the SECT imo.
quote:
There had to be politics of them getting left out last year
Quality wins had the be the key.
Posted on 3/14/16 at 8:53 pm to CidCock
GAMECOCKS SHOULD HAVE GOT IN.NO RESPECT FOR SEC
Page 8 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News