Started By
Message
re: NCAA has nothing, on fishing expedition
Posted on 8/26/16 at 12:17 pm to HottyToddy7
Posted on 8/26/16 at 12:17 pm to HottyToddy7
It's really impressive how shitty the CL is.
Posted on 8/26/16 at 12:24 pm to skirpnasty
What is funny is both sides think that because it is pretty middle of the road with both schools. Logic in an illogical world that is Mississippi Athletics.
Posted on 8/26/16 at 12:29 pm to HottyToddy7
quote:What law firm are y'all using to research and build your defense case when you go before the Committee on Infractions?
They were LvL 1 violations. They will be argued and OM expects there to be less than that when they get their day to explain themselves. It may not change but the OM administration is expecting it to.
Posted on 8/26/16 at 12:32 pm to RT1941
They also expected to be able to cheat their dicks off without getting caught. Who cares what the admins expect ?
Posted on 8/26/16 at 12:35 pm to lefty08
Except there has been 0 pay for play in the NOA. So you are full of shite and have no idea what you are talking about.
I dont't know but the athletics department has spent 1.5 mil on legal fees.
I dont't know but the athletics department has spent 1.5 mil on legal fees.
Posted on 8/26/16 at 1:07 pm to HottyToddy7
Yeah. I'm full of shite.
Posted on 8/26/16 at 1:11 pm to lefty08
Facts and all... Sorry you're border line illiterate
This post was edited on 8/26/16 at 1:12 pm
Posted on 8/26/16 at 1:14 pm to HottyToddy7
The AD says that over 1.5 million have been spent on legal fees = good news
The Birmingham legal counsel, who was supposed to guide Ole Miss through the murky waters and get them a favorable ruling, drops the case right after the Draft night fiasco = not good news
The Birmingham legal counsel, who was supposed to guide Ole Miss through the murky waters and get them a favorable ruling, drops the case right after the Draft night fiasco = not good news
Posted on 8/26/16 at 1:21 pm to Vecchio Cane
Why do State fans know more about the OM investigation than anyone else? Screams little bro.
Posted on 8/26/16 at 1:25 pm to HottyToddy7
Threads like this make Mizzou attention whoring really difficult. You should be ashamed.
Posted on 8/26/16 at 1:34 pm to HottyToddy7
Why do State fans know more about the OM investigation than anyone else? Screams little bro.
----------------------------------------------------
Not since the heyday of Mr. Magoo has myopia been this entertaining
----------------------------------------------------
Not since the heyday of Mr. Magoo has myopia been this entertaining
Posted on 8/26/16 at 1:50 pm to HottyToddy7
quote:
He was saying at some point OM and Bjork have to change their stance, aka fight back and tell the NCAA to go frick themselves but I don't see that happening.
That is basically what they have been doing. They clearly have not been fully cooperative as was seen on Draft Night. They (the staff as a whole) has clearly been dishonest with the NCAA and the fan base...either actively or tacitly.
Hell, they were telling recruits on the weekend the Forte story ran (before signing day), that is all related to the previous staff. Turns out - that was a HUGE lie.
I think the NCAA believes that Bjork has been fricking with them the whole time with his "I can't wait to tell our side of the story" media stance.
OM is about to get damaged, period. I think Bjork goes, Freeze ends up being retained when Archie steps in as interim AD.
Old Hugh will then run an article about how Bjork lied to him for years on end - to save face.
Bjork and a few assistants will be the ultimate fall-guys in all of this mess.
This post was edited on 8/26/16 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 8/26/16 at 2:01 pm to DeltaDoc
That's just stupid. All the Lvl 1's were either about Tunsil or the ACT stuff. He didn't exactly lie. I think there was some miscommunication between whoever published that phrase. Instead of "it was all under the previous staff" it was "almost all of it doesn't include Freeze" which is true.
Posted on 8/26/16 at 2:04 pm to HottyToddy7
quote:
He didn't exactly lie. I think there was some miscommunication between whoever published that phrase. Instead of "it was all under the previous staff" it was "almost all of it doesn't include Freeze" which is true.
Or didn't exactly tell the truth??
Posted on 8/26/16 at 2:08 pm to mikrit54
Or he was misquoted. Happens all the time. The phrases have the same connotation but in hindsight mean 2 completely separate things. A journalist with an objective could have easily changed the quote.
This post was edited on 8/26/16 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 8/26/16 at 2:13 pm to HottyToddy7
Why is it every time shite blows up on somebody they play the misquoted card?
Posted on 8/26/16 at 2:24 pm to mikrit54
Because most journalist are terrible at their job.
Posted on 8/26/16 at 2:31 pm to DingLeeBerry
That dude got shoved in a trashcan or two back in high school
Posted on 8/26/16 at 2:42 pm to msuboss71
You want to know how I know that you work an hourly job?
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News