Started By
Message
2
Posted on 1/4/12 at 9:45 pm to AU1292
Not to mention that those teams were Pac-12, Big 12, and Big East champs
And possibly Arky in the Cotton Bowl too.
This more than anything else is why I wanted Ok St more than Bama...to put an absolutely impossible resume together.
And possibly Arky in the Cotton Bowl too.
This more than anything else is why I wanted Ok St more than Bama...to put an absolutely impossible resume together.
Posted on 1/4/12 at 9:48 pm to Starchild
quote:
There's no denying it anymore. A win on Monday puts LSU right there with the greats of all time.
We will most certainly be the most accomplished college football team not only in the BCS era, but maybe of all time.
Just go ahead and say the most impressive feat ever by any program in college sports (Including Wooden's run at UCLA-JJ/Lee >>> Alcindor/Walton)
This post was edited on 1/4/12 at 9:49 pm
Posted on 1/4/12 at 9:55 pm to Unbiased Bama Fan
quote:
To be fair, West Virginia or the team they're playing Clemson has no business being in a BCS Bowl game.
What? That's one of the most idiotic things I've seen posted here. Even from a gump. And I don't exactly have high expectations from Alabama's fan base to begin with.
Any team that can score 49 points in the first half in the Orange Bowl, vs the champions of a BCS conference, deserves respect.
No one with a brain, which evidently excludes quite a few Tide fans, is anything but impressed with WVU's offense tonight.
LSU's victory at WVU looks even more impressive right now. To anyone with a brain, that is.
Posted on 1/4/12 at 10:09 pm to AU1292
quote:
If Ok State would've made it to the MNC, Alabama would have played in and most likely won the Sugar Bowl giving LSU 3 wins over BCS bowl winners.
Makes you hate "I'm a man" Gundy more than I did before. Damn him for robbing MY team of more glory.
They need to redo this poster and add the "BCS Winner" in the appropriate spots:
Posted on 1/4/12 at 10:15 pm to Unbiased Bama Fan
quote:
To be fair, West Virginia or the team they're playing Clemson has no business being in a BCS Bowl game.
Hmm, they have more reason to be in their bowl game than does Bama in the title game.
Won't matter come Monday though when Les raises crystal number 2.
Posted on 1/4/12 at 10:18 pm to Crimson Mafia IIIX
quote:
So if Alabama beats LSU wouldn't that make us the greatest team in history since we beat the team that beat all of those teams?
But, if we apply gump logic to it, we can never really know who is best because they would need to play 10 times to decide that, and since that cannot happen, bama is awarded the honor by default.
It really is a flawless system
Posted on 1/4/12 at 10:26 pm to chinese58
Let Bama win so you can say you beat 3 BCS winners.
This post was edited on 1/4/12 at 10:30 pm
Posted on 1/4/12 at 10:39 pm to nofear67
quote:
Understand the rules
Which you clearly don't.
Posted on 1/4/12 at 10:40 pm to chinese58
Losing to Bama will hurt even worse and make a Bama win even more emphatic.
Posted on 1/4/12 at 10:47 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
vs the champions of a BCS conference, deserves respect.
A conference that has scored exactly 2 points in the last eleven BCS games? You're a fricking moron.
Posted on 1/4/12 at 10:56 pm to Starchild
quote:
Not to mention that those teams were Pac-12, Big 12, and Big East champs
And possibly Arky in the Cotton Bowl too.
This more than anything else is why I wanted Ok St more than Bama...to put an absolutely impossible resume together.
Exactly.
Posted on 1/4/12 at 11:28 pm to LSU1NSEC
quote:
Not to mention that those teams were Pac-12, Big 12, and Big East champs
And possibly Arky in the Cotton Bowl too.
This more than anything else is why I wanted Ok St more than Bama...to put an absolutely impossible resume together.
Exactly.
Absolutely!
Posted on 1/4/12 at 11:34 pm to crimsonsaint
quote:
And Im still not sure how a team who cant win its own division can be able to play for the national championship....
quote:
Watch more ESPN and you'll figure it out.
Fixed for you
Posted on 1/4/12 at 11:47 pm to chinese58
on paper it's would be tough to argue against, but that 01' Miami' team was pretty ridiculous.
The names on their roster kind of play a big factor though, IMO.
eta: in 10 years when people are comparing resumes, I think most lean towards LSU.
obligatory if they get the win.
The names on their roster kind of play a big factor though, IMO.
eta: in 10 years when people are comparing resumes, I think most lean towards LSU.
obligatory if they get the win.
This post was edited on 1/4/12 at 11:52 pm
Posted on 1/5/12 at 12:04 am to fr33manator
quote:
But, if we apply gump logic to it, we can never really know who is best because they would need to play 10 times to decide that, and since that cannot happen, bama is awarded the honor by default.
Gump logic says Bama is best based on the eyeball test. And if that fails, use defensive stats. But only defensive stats--offense and special teams dont matter.
Posted on 1/5/12 at 12:41 am to WelcomeToDeathValley
The '01 Miami team was better from a talent perspective, but resume wise they almost to far inferior BC and VT teams. LSU didn't play a close game outside of the retards in Alabama this year
Posted on 1/5/12 at 1:14 am to Evolved Simian
quote:
Which you clearly don't.
He was referring to the rule that states the champion of a BCS conference gets an automatic bid to a BCS game, therefore making both teams deserving of playing in a BCS game.
I'm glad I could help you understand this. Let me know if you have anymore questions.
Posted on 1/5/12 at 3:13 am to Adam Banks
quote:
And Im still not sure how a team who cant win its own division can be able to play for the national championship....
this.
see, their leader's quote below.
Posted on 1/5/12 at 3:20 am to Schwaaz
quote:
Losing to Bama will hurt even worse and make a Bama win even more emphatic.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News