Started By
Message

re: Miles still seeking change to SEC slate

Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:55 pm to
Posted by BIG DADDY 73
Roanoke, AL.
Member since Dec 2012
903 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:55 pm to
Mizzou was supposed to be better than ATM.

Johnelle wasn't the coach yet when the bridge schedule was made.

Chiz was a year removed from a Natty.

And Dooley had Braysus all those recievers and a good OL returning.
Posted by Patton
Principality of Sealand
Member since Apr 2011
32652 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:56 pm to
Just stop. This is the first rational conversation I've been able to have with a LSU fan about all this. Go play.
Posted by Swm323
Pace,FL
Member since Mar 2013
1360 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:02 pm to
You said that when Bama had a hard schedule they lost 3 games. I pointed out that LSU has only won national championships when their schedule is easier. I understand that LSU's schedule is easier less frequently than Bama's. When Zook wss at UF did you feel this strongly about cross divisional rivalries? When Bama was down I wonder if UF complained about having to play LSU when UT played Bama?
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84876 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:02 pm to
I'm not saying I don't value rivalries, I just don't see any way in which they can coexist with a schedule rotation that is as fair to everyone as it can be. To me that has to be your priority in any sporting endeavor.

I don't think that there is some kind of conspiracy or anything, but doesn't the appearance bother you? You can't tell me that if the situations were reversed there wouldn't be a lot of your fans upset like they were about the bye week situation.

The only thing that could maybe make everyone happy is to do away with divisions and give everyone 2 permanents and 6 rotationals.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84876 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

When Zook wss at UF did you feel this strongly about cross divisional rivalries?


Yes
Posted by LukeSidewalker
Mobile, Alabama
Member since Dec 2012
8417 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

The only thing that could maybe make everyone happy is


to win all your games, even the rematch one at the end of the season.

Dude, you are talking to a fan base that was down for a decade, and everyone was beating us, and now that we are winning games, people cry, and we dont give a frick. So, STFU.
This post was edited on 5/22/13 at 5:07 pm
Posted by Patton
Principality of Sealand
Member since Apr 2011
32652 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

The only thing that could maybe make everyone happy is to do away with divisions and give everyone 2 permanents and 6 rotationals.


Im fine with this.

Make it happen LSU fans
This post was edited on 5/22/13 at 5:07 pm
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84876 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:07 pm to
How old are you? Serious question.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84876 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:08 pm to
NCAA rules currently prohibit you to have a CCG w/o divisions.
Posted by Swm323
Pace,FL
Member since Mar 2013
1360 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:08 pm to
Fair enough. I understand LSU's complaint. It looks bad. I don't think there is any conspiracy. Didn't all ADs have to sign off on the bridge schedules though?
Posted by BIG DADDY 73
Roanoke, AL.
Member since Dec 2012
903 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

Didn't all ADs have to sign off on the bridge schedules though?




Yes
Posted by Patton
Principality of Sealand
Member since Apr 2011
32652 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:09 pm to
frick the NCAA they don't even give out titles.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84876 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

Didn't all ADs have to sign off on the bridge schedules though?


Alleva said they were simply told what the schedule was and had no input
Posted by LukeSidewalker
Mobile, Alabama
Member since Dec 2012
8417 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

How old are you? Serious question.


I was just born yesterday. So you can imagine my confusion on how you will not let the schedule thing go.

Do you feel Bama is cheating to get the schedule they want? Serious question, or that someone is helping us out with the "easy games".



Posted by BIG DADDY 73
Roanoke, AL.
Member since Dec 2012
903 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

Alleva said they were simply told what the schedule was and had no input



Same for everybody, but everybody signed off on them.
Posted by LSUNV
In the woods or on the water
Member since Feb 2011
22422 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:15 pm to
Rational conversation going on, the first I have seen on this topic, and a Bama fan trying to derail it!
Posted by BIG DADDY 73
Roanoke, AL.
Member since Dec 2012
903 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:18 pm to
LSUNV, this has been the most reasonable conversations about this, surprisingly.

Posted by LukeSidewalker
Mobile, Alabama
Member since Dec 2012
8417 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

LSUNV, this has been the most reasonable conversations about this, surprisingly.


I apologize, I should have read more of the thread, I just assumed Alabama was cheating again. My bad, carry on,
Posted by LSUNV
In the woods or on the water
Member since Feb 2011
22422 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:19 pm to
I agree!

I have actually enjoyed this one
This post was edited on 5/22/13 at 5:21 pm
Posted by Patton
Principality of Sealand
Member since Apr 2011
32652 posts
Posted on 5/22/13 at 5:20 pm to
DS still can't resist jabs at UA though. He really does hate us.
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter