Started By
Message
re: Miles still seeking change to SEC slate
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:20 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:20 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
I'm on my phone right now so I can't post the dates that I saw but Mississippi State playing more games doesn't mean a whole lot
Huh?
You just said Bama was the only school that played more games than all other SEC teams back then.
That is 100% false.
1
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:21 pm to FlukerFlakes
Apparently it is and for that 
to you
I will look up the article I saw on this issue when I get home and post it.
to you I will look up the article I saw on this issue when I get home and post it.
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:21 pm to Draconian Sanctions
So this whole thing isn't about LSU not wanting to play Florida, but about LSU fans wanting UA to play a harder schedule?
Did I get that right?
Did I get that right?
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:22 pm to Patton
quote:
So this whole thing isn't about LSU not wanting to play Florida, but about LSU fans wanting UA to play a harder schedule?
Did I get that right?
Correct, and if that's not possible then make them as even as possible.
As it stands Alabama has a built in advantage and that's the problem here.
This post was edited on 5/22/13 at 4:24 pm
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:23 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Draconian Sanctions, so LSU signed off on playing UF two separate times, and didn't decide to bitch about it until the bridge shite came about.
Will yall be ok after the bridge is over and we get back to the rotation?
Will yall be ok after the bridge is over and we get back to the rotation?
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:25 pm to BIG DADDY 73
We didn't sign on for it so much as it was forced upon us.
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:26 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
As it stands Alabama has a built in advantage and that's the problem here.
Sure, right now this is true. But there was no built in advantage when they were kicking our arse. You want to punish two fanbases because one team has hit a historic low. Thats not fair.
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:27 pm to BIG DADDY 73
quote:
Will yall be ok after the bridge is over and we get back to the rotation?
Well #1 the bridge schedule was only supposed to last one year so we'll see if it ever does end.
#2 no because 1 perm 2 rotations is better than 1 perm 1 rotation because now you will get these seasons where you get UT and KY. At least before it would have been UT, KY and UF/UGA so it wasn't as bad.
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:27 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
We didn't sign on for it so much as it was FORCED UPON US
Like Pulp Fiction?
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:29 pm to Patton
quote:
Sure, right now this is true. But there was no built in advantage when they were kicking our arse. You want to punish two fanbases because one team has hit a historic low. Thats not fair.
Under the current cfb landscape the UT job is significantly harder than it has been in the past. It is not likely they will be what they were again for a very very long time.
And even if you're right, it's still less unfair than one team getting an easier route to Atlanta than other teams. That is a fundamental problem.
This post was edited on 5/22/13 at 4:30 pm
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:31 pm to Draconian Sanctions
So than drop off UF and start playing UK or Mizz every year. It just silly to sit there and say its not fair Bama's traditional rivalry is boring now so it should stop. like I said, leave our games alone
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:31 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Well #1 the bridge schedule was only supposed to last one year so we'll see if it ever does end.
#2 no because 1 perm 2 rotations is better than 1 perm 1 rotation because now you will get these seasons where you get UT and KY. At least before it would have been UT, KY and UF/UGA so it wasn't as bad.
Shouldn't the cause of your troubles be placed solely at what is the ineptitude of Missouri football?
I mean is they weren't one of the worst teams in FBS, would there be a problem?
It is high time to kick Missouri out of the SEC and get a real team.
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:33 pm to Patton
quote:
So than drop off UF and start playing UK or Mizz every year. It just silly to sit there and say its not fair Bama's traditional rivalry is boring now so it should stop. like I said, leave our games alone
I don't want LSU to play an easy Bama schedule, I want Bama to play a hard LSU schedule.
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:34 pm to FlukerFlakes
quote:
Shouldn't the cause of your troubles be placed solely at what is the ineptitude of Missouri football?
I mean is they weren't one of the worst teams in FBS, would there be a problem?
It is high time to kick Missouri out of the SEC and get a real team.
Who is Missouri?
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:38 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Well I don't want the whims of other fanbases to influence a 100 year old rivalry.
Post the SOS for LSU and UA for the past decade. If there is as much of a discrepancy as you say than I will concede defeat and write angry letters to Battle demanding better OOC games.
Post the SOS for LSU and UA for the past decade. If there is as much of a discrepancy as you say than I will concede defeat and write angry letters to Battle demanding better OOC games.
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:39 pm to FlukerFlakes
Bunch of gump pansies posting crap about schedules. All they want is to make sure they have the easiest path to the BCS. They own the only Championship mulligan in sports history. Bunch of babies...
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:39 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
I don't want LSU to play an easy Bama schedule, I want Bama to play a hard LSU schedule.
Dammit DC, leave our TSIO game alone, they kicked our arse while we were down, let us repay the favor.
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:40 pm to Patton
What does OOC have to do with this and what SOS formula would you like to use and why?
It's not a whim. It's about competitive balance and its extremely selfish of you to put your own secondary rivalry above that.
quote:
Well I don't want the whims of other fanbases to influence a 100 year old rivalry.
It's not a whim. It's about competitive balance and its extremely selfish of you to put your own secondary rivalry above that.
This post was edited on 5/22/13 at 4:42 pm
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:41 pm to FreddieMac
quote:
Bunch of gump pansies posting crap about schedules. All they want is to make sure they have the easiest path to the BCS. They own the only Championship mulligan in sports history. Bunch of babies...
Pretty ironic statement
Posted on 5/22/13 at 4:41 pm to Wideman
Why can't Bama fans see/understand the total horseshite of the 2012/2013 "bridge schedules" ?
Are bama shades soooo dark crimson there's nothing that can be seen...I mean really !
Are bama shades soooo dark crimson there's nothing that can be seen...I mean really !
Page 10 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News