Started By
Message
re: LSU 2013
Posted on 12/9/12 at 2:51 pm to 167back
Posted on 12/9/12 at 2:51 pm to 167back
I stand corrected, it's eight 10+ win seasons, not sure where I got the number 10 from.
Also, the number 6 for SECCG came from winning the East 6 times, two of those were "ties" and I forgot they split those.
Sorry for the bad math.
Also, the number 6 for SECCG came from winning the East 6 times, two of those were "ties" and I forgot they split those.
Sorry for the bad math.
2
Posted on 12/9/12 at 2:51 pm to deeprig9
TCU - should win
UAB - win
Kent State - win
Auburn - win
UGA - depends on who UGA returns, but we have a good shot at winning that one. Should be a top5 matchup next year
State - win
Florida - I think their secondary loses a bit to the NFL, and I dont think Driskell is good enough to beat us without Gillislee
Ole Miss - win (we always play them close in BR and smash them in Oxford)
Fruman - win
Bama - always could go either way
aTm - We shutdown Manziel this year, I think we can again next year at home without his AA OL
Arky - win(they will be rebuilding and changing schemes.
So, 4 toughest games, we get 2 at home and 2 on the road. We don't have the same issues now that we did against Florida early in the year, our defense had a lot of freshman playing this year so you can expect them to be better by virtue of experience.
better secondary, better OL, better offense, not as experienced at DE but still got pass-rushers who can wreak havoc in Rasco and Hunter.
I can easily see 10-2 again next year and if the offense is clicking from the start we have potential to make a run at 12-0. If everything goes to hell in a handbasket with injuries and off-field shite like it did this year, then I can also 9-3 or 8-4. Miles is pretty good about not letting that derail seasons though, so anywhere from 10-2 to 12-0 is reasonable for LSU next year. It's the SEC so nothing is guaranteed.
UAB - win
Kent State - win
Auburn - win
UGA - depends on who UGA returns, but we have a good shot at winning that one. Should be a top5 matchup next year
State - win
Florida - I think their secondary loses a bit to the NFL, and I dont think Driskell is good enough to beat us without Gillislee
Ole Miss - win (we always play them close in BR and smash them in Oxford)
Fruman - win
Bama - always could go either way
aTm - We shutdown Manziel this year, I think we can again next year at home without his AA OL
Arky - win(they will be rebuilding and changing schemes.
So, 4 toughest games, we get 2 at home and 2 on the road. We don't have the same issues now that we did against Florida early in the year, our defense had a lot of freshman playing this year so you can expect them to be better by virtue of experience.
better secondary, better OL, better offense, not as experienced at DE but still got pass-rushers who can wreak havoc in Rasco and Hunter.
I can easily see 10-2 again next year and if the offense is clicking from the start we have potential to make a run at 12-0. If everything goes to hell in a handbasket with injuries and off-field shite like it did this year, then I can also 9-3 or 8-4. Miles is pretty good about not letting that derail seasons though, so anywhere from 10-2 to 12-0 is reasonable for LSU next year. It's the SEC so nothing is guaranteed.
Posted on 12/9/12 at 2:54 pm to TigerMoose
quote:
So how did UGA get screwed out of 2 NC bids. Both years that they won the SEC (2002 and 2005), the teams in the NC were undefeated.
2002: 13-1 with SEC Conference title, overlooked for NC bid = screwed.
I'll give you 2005. I forgot UGA had 3 losses that year.
Now that I've got some actual stats pulled up, and not going off of memory, give me a few minutes and I'll clear up some more misconceptions.
Posted on 12/9/12 at 2:55 pm to deeprig9
UGA's "D' in '10 actually gave up fewer points than in '09 and '08 and less than 2 points per game more than UGA's 11-2 squad of '07. Dawgs '11 team gave up 1.5 less points per game than '10.
UGA's '11, '09 and '08 teams returned more starters than that no defense '10 team.
On the other side of the ball that '10 georgia team outscored '08, '09 and '11. That '10 offense had a higher YPC avg and better completion percentage than the '11 team. It also gave up fewer sacks and had a better TO margin.
UGA's '11, '09 and '08 teams returned more starters than that no defense '10 team.
On the other side of the ball that '10 georgia team outscored '08, '09 and '11. That '10 offense had a higher YPC avg and better completion percentage than the '11 team. It also gave up fewer sacks and had a better TO margin.
Posted on 12/9/12 at 2:56 pm to deeprig9
quote:
I'm only counting seven wins here, maybe 8 if they beat Ole Miss, that game is pretty much a tossup, same as Arkansas, which I give to LSU to be fair.
If you want to be realistic, LSU has played tougher schedules than this one over Miles tenure. He has won 10 games in 6 of 8 years. His worst year was 8-4 when Lee was a freshman and threw a ton of pick 6s. 7-5 is more of stretch than 12-0 would be for LSU next year in all honesty.
Posted on 12/9/12 at 2:56 pm to deeprig9
If you didn't go to atlanta you didn't win your division.
Posted on 12/9/12 at 3:02 pm to 167back
quote:
UGA's "D' in '10 actually gave up fewer points than in '09 and '08 and less than 2 points per game more than UGA's 11-2 squad of '07. Dawgs '11 team gave up 1.5 less points per game than '10. UGA's '11, '09 and '08 teams returned more starters than that no defense '10 team. On the other side of the ball that '10 georgia team outscored '08, '09 and '11. That '10 offense had a higher YPC avg and better completion percentage than the '11 team. It also gave up fewer sacks and had a better TO margin.
If you say so.
At this point I don't even know what we are talking about any more. UGA and Mark Richt and Aaron Murray suck, I got it.
Can we talk about LSU's 2013 schedule now?
This post was edited on 12/9/12 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 12/9/12 at 3:14 pm to deeprig9
quote:
2002: 13-1 with SEC Conference title, overlooked for NC bid = screwed.
This doesn't equal being screwed when the two teams playing in the NC had undefeated regular seasons. I'd give it to you if one of the two teams had a loss.
quote:
I'll give you 2005. I forgot UGA had 3 losses that year.
Now that I've got some actual stats pulled up, and not going off of memory, give me a few minutes and I'll clear up some more misconceptions.
You sure have made a lot of mistakes in this one thread. Maybe you should just quit while you are behind.
As for your 7-5 prediction for LSU next year,
Posted on 12/9/12 at 3:17 pm to hg
There is so much full retardation going on in this thread that I feel like I might be becoming retarded by just reading it.
I mean some of you idiots really think LSU is only going to get 5-7 wins
I mean some of you idiots really think LSU is only going to get 5-7 wins
Posted on 12/9/12 at 3:18 pm to deeprig9
quote:
I stand corrected, it's eight 10+ win seasons, not sure where I got the number 10 from.
Also, the number 6 for SECCG came from winning the East 6 times, two of those were "ties" and I forgot they split those.
Sorry for the bad math.
quote:
deeprig9
derp
Posted on 12/9/12 at 3:22 pm to deeprig9
quote:
How does LSU get to ten?
We gonna win em all, buddy.
Posted on 12/9/12 at 3:29 pm to deeprig9
You dogged the LSU "D".
LSU fans responded about all the players dawgs losing off their "D".
You defended your team.
Then you posted some wrong intel and got called on it.
As for the tigers '13 schedule. It's not anymore difficult than what we are use to.
It's hard to predict now because of the players that might leave early off the "D".
LSU "O" will be loaded though.
O-line returns five players with multiple game starting experience. Starting RG and RT were freshmen and the starting LG was a true soph. Return former starters from injury at LT and RG. Only position without multiple game starting experience is center. He does have one start to his credit though.
No SR RB on the roster. Loaded for bear and return opening game starter back from injury.
Only one SR WR on the team. Shepard saw his PT diminish as the season went on. WRs really stepped up their production last four games of the season.
Return Mettenberger at QB. Started every game last year and really came on strong last four games of the season.
Chavis and his assistants have recruited very well for years. If we lose multiple players early we wll find out quick how good those young recruits are.
Back seven will be among the best in the country. That's whether Reid and Minter leave early. If Minter comes back for SR season this "D" could be special.
Starting front four will be LSU good. It's the depth that will suffer early on if Montgomery, Mingo and Logan opt out early. If any of the three return watch out.
As for the results of the schedule, again next year it will be settled @ ama.
Is that what you were looking for?
LSU fans responded about all the players dawgs losing off their "D".
You defended your team.
Then you posted some wrong intel and got called on it.
As for the tigers '13 schedule. It's not anymore difficult than what we are use to.
It's hard to predict now because of the players that might leave early off the "D".
LSU "O" will be loaded though.
O-line returns five players with multiple game starting experience. Starting RG and RT were freshmen and the starting LG was a true soph. Return former starters from injury at LT and RG. Only position without multiple game starting experience is center. He does have one start to his credit though.
No SR RB on the roster. Loaded for bear and return opening game starter back from injury.
Only one SR WR on the team. Shepard saw his PT diminish as the season went on. WRs really stepped up their production last four games of the season.
Return Mettenberger at QB. Started every game last year and really came on strong last four games of the season.
Chavis and his assistants have recruited very well for years. If we lose multiple players early we wll find out quick how good those young recruits are.
Back seven will be among the best in the country. That's whether Reid and Minter leave early. If Minter comes back for SR season this "D" could be special.
Starting front four will be LSU good. It's the depth that will suffer early on if Montgomery, Mingo and Logan opt out early. If any of the three return watch out.
As for the results of the schedule, again next year it will be settled @ ama.
Is that what you were looking for?
Posted on 12/9/12 at 3:48 pm to 167back
And just like that the Dawg fan is GONE! 
Posted on 12/9/12 at 4:01 pm to TIGERVATO
Still here little buddy!
Posted on 12/9/12 at 4:14 pm to deeprig9
quote:
Still here little buddy!
This thread didn't quite go the way you planned, huh?Posted on 12/9/12 at 4:43 pm to TigerMoose
quote:
This thread didn't quite go the way you planned, huh?
A few pages back I apologized for letting it get derailed, you LSU fans tricked me into defending my own team when I wanted to talk about LSU's 2013 season. Tricksters you are.
Posted on 12/9/12 at 5:22 pm to deeprig9
Lmao UGA might get lucky to back into the SECCG again. Then LSU will blow them out again.
Posted on 12/9/12 at 5:23 pm to deeprig9
Bama just rushed for 350 on UGa. Bull/Dozer/Hill alone will beat UGa by 10+.
Posted on 12/9/12 at 5:52 pm to TiGeRTeRRoR
quote:
Ole Miss? They'll be better but besides Jefferson and Miles not knowing a spike takes time off the clock, we've done well there lately. That's a win.
Solid reasoning.
Not saying OM wins but lol at your reasoning. LSU doing well there was w/ NUTT at the helm. Posted on 12/9/12 at 5:59 pm to sunnydaze
The stupidity you guys have about LSU football is hilarious and pathetic at the same time. Either way LSU steam rolls Georgia at their place next year.
This post was edited on 12/9/12 at 6:03 pm
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News