Started By
Message
re: Let's have a look back at the BCS days (1998-2013)
Posted on 4/10/15 at 10:28 am to Korin
Posted on 4/10/15 at 10:28 am to Korin
quote:
"2011 Bama is the most undeserving modern day cfb champion."
What's so hard to understand about the fact that I misread and was including teams that played in the title game?
1
Posted on 4/10/15 at 10:29 am to RB10
So you misread but I'm the one having a problem with comprehension? 
This post was edited on 4/10/15 at 10:30 am
Posted on 4/10/15 at 10:30 am to Old Sarge
quote:
Co champion just doesn't say "great" to most folks
Better than no-champions
Posted on 4/10/15 at 10:31 am to Korin
quote:
So you misread but I'm the one having a problem with comprehension?
Apparently so. Why else would you quote, "2011 Bama is the most undeserving modern day cfb champion", after I already admitted to including participants?
Posted on 4/10/15 at 10:31 am to TigerTerd
But A&M won 2 titles during the BCS era.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 10:32 am to RB10
quote:
Apparently so. Why else would you quote, "2011 Bama is the most undeserving modern day cfb champion", after I already admitted to including participants?
It's all good, you already admitted your error.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 10:54 am to GumpDyke
quote:
who is the most undeserving team to be crowned BCS Champions?
Easy question.
2011 Bama.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 10:54 am to Chimlim
We got the original mulligan 15 years before mighty Bama. 
Posted on 4/10/15 at 10:56 am to Chimlim
quote:
Easy question.
2011 Bama.
So...I'm guessing you think LSU was the real champion of 2011?
If so, how would you explain 21-0?
Posted on 4/10/15 at 10:58 am to GumpDyke
quote:
The Bama mulligan team?
The LSU team that lost 2 games...to Arkansas & Kentucky ?
The Auburn team who were allowed to field a player who should clearly have been ruled inelligible according to NCAA rules at the time?
If you must pick, LSU lost two games in OT, but they were to bad, bad teams.. LSU has always been lucky to get in the game. The one they got screwed in was the mulligan game. Bama was the best team, but should not have been given a Mulligan, so they get my vote.
This post was edited on 4/10/15 at 11:00 am
Posted on 4/10/15 at 11:05 am to allin2010
quote:
If you must pick, LSU lost two games in OT, but they were to bad, bad teams.. LSU has always been lucky to get in the game. The one they got screwed in was the mulligan game. Bama was the best team, but should not have been given a Mulligan, so they get my vote.
Bro...the voting police have ruled your ballot to have a hanging chad.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 11:07 am to GumpDyke
The BCS system was so incredibly stupid.
For the life of me, I cannot figure out how we all heard that computers were going to be 50% of the formula and said to ourselves "Well, that sounds like a great idea!" The computers rankings were absolute shite-shows.
For the life of me, I cannot figure out how we all heard that computers were going to be 50% of the formula and said to ourselves "Well, that sounds like a great idea!" The computers rankings were absolute shite-shows.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 11:10 am to GumpDyke
quote:
So...I'm guessing you think LSU was the real champion of 2011?
No I didn't say that. Out of all the BCS champions, the 2011 Bama team was most undeserving.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 11:11 am to GumpDyke
I wish you would've labeled the title accurately according to the contents of your message.
It would've looked closer to this: "Let's talk (read shite on) Auburn's days in the BCS with little to no mention of any other team"
It would've looked closer to this: "Let's talk (read shite on) Auburn's days in the BCS with little to no mention of any other team"
Posted on 4/10/15 at 11:14 am to Aman
quote:
everyone who has half a brain or doesn't hate Bama knows Bama was the best team in college football that season. One OT loss in the regular season doesn't change that.
Classic gump perspective. We may have lost to you, but we're still the better team dammit!
This post was edited on 4/10/15 at 11:17 am
Posted on 4/10/15 at 11:16 am to Chimlim
So 2011 shouldn't have had a crowned champion?
Come on, now.
Come on, now.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 11:19 am to Chaos_Actual
Who should've played though?
11-1 Alabama: lost to #1 by 3
11-1 Oklahoma State: lost to a 6-6 team
11-2 Oregon: 2 losses
11-1 Stanford: raped at home by Oregon
11-1 Alabama: lost to #1 by 3
11-1 Oklahoma State: lost to a 6-6 team
11-2 Oregon: 2 losses
11-1 Stanford: raped at home by Oregon
Posted on 4/10/15 at 11:21 am to GumpDyke
I'm just answering the question you posted
Face facts, the most undeserving BCS Champion is the 2011 Bama team. I'm not saying there shouldn't be a champion. But Bama won the BCS and they were undeserving of it.
Face facts, the most undeserving BCS Champion is the 2011 Bama team. I'm not saying there shouldn't be a champion. But Bama won the BCS and they were undeserving of it.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 11:23 am to Chimlim
quote:
he most undeserving BCS Champion is the 2011 Bama team. I'm not saying there shouldn't be a champion. But Bama won the BCS and they were undeserving of it.
It makes that championship so much sweeter that LSU fans are still crying about it too.
Posted on 4/10/15 at 11:26 am to elposter
And they probably won't stop until they win a title again. FSU fans whined for years until recently about how they should've played BYU (who lost to a 6-5 team) in 96 instead of us again.
Page 3 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News