Started By
Message
re: Leonard Fournette overrated? Yes.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:34 pm to shotcaller1
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:34 pm to shotcaller1
quote:
Yes. Agreed. Dude already peaked
How could you possibly know? His sophomore year was way better than his freshman year and his junior year has yet to be played. Not even a game. So how could you say he has peaked if you have nothing to base his best season on?
This post was edited on 8/17/16 at 12:35 pm
1
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:35 pm to ClayAguayo
quote:
Henry had more yards against EVERY common opponent.
and fournette had more yards per carry against common opponents.
nice try.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:37 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
David Johnson has 581 career rushing yards. I mean the dude has started like 4 games in his career.
And has looked much better than Ingram in those 4 starts. I don't think there's any question the Saints would take David Johnson over Ingram in a heartbeat.
quote:
Ingram was playing better than Lacy and Murray a year ago. There's really no debating that Ingram was a top 5 back at the point he got injured last year (the problem).
Lacy got off to a slow start and Murray was in a terrible system. Ingram was much improved last year, but looking at his career as a whole, there's no way he is a top 10 back.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:37 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
There's really no debating that Ingram was a top 5 back
Sure there is.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:38 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
Nothing in the post was false. It just lacked any concept of context. He also ignored other facts that were more telling but harmful to his terrible point. It would be like saying Bama lost to ole miss, Memphis beat ole miss therefore Memphis was better then Bama. Then saying is anything wrong in that post.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:38 pm to cajunbama
quote:
Your uncle doesn't post here son. Rent free. In yo head.
This guy posts verifiable facts and y'all lose your shite.
If you look at boogers numbers against top 50 defenses he is overrated.
Doesn't mean he isn't good, but he is not close to Herschel, Bo, or Heisman Henry.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:38 pm to I-H8-BAMA
quote:
How could you possibly know? His sophomore year was way better than his freshman year and his junior year has yet to be played. Not even a game. So how could you say he has peaked if you have nothing to base his best season on?
He doesn't, Daniel just wanted to log out of his texag7 account and post something on his shotcaller account to avoid suspicion.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:38 pm to ClayAguayo
Oh look. Another retard rally on tRant. Yay.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:39 pm to UpToPar
quote:
Lacy got off to a fat, slow and lazy start
FIFY.
However, he looks to have rededicated himself, and I would trade him for Ingram as of yesterday.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:39 pm to ClayAguayo
OP can STTDB
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:40 pm to UpToPar
quote:
And has looked much better than Ingram in those 4 starts
That's weird. They both averaged 4.6 ypc a year ago
quote:
but looking at his career as a whole, there's no way he is a top 10 back.
Which is it? Current form or career achievement?
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:42 pm to td01241
quote:
You used your alter to tell used Fournette isn't as good as the the heisman trophy winner from last year? Odd
5 pages in 1 hour. I'd say he posted wisely...
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:43 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
No matter how you shake it, Mark Ingram isn't a top-10 running back. The great part of it is, you don't have to take my word for it...his numbers prove it.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:44 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
Give it up man Mark Ingram isn't a top 10 back. As of today he's not. He may have some magical year that puts him up there but he's not a top 10 back at the moment.
This post was edited on 8/17/16 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:45 pm to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
That's weird. They both averaged 4.6 ypc a year ago
Johnson also had 2 more rushing TDs than Ingram to go along with 36 rec for 457 yards and 4 TDs. Just for perspective, last year Ingram had 50 rec for 405 yards and 0 TDs. I'd say Johnson was better in his limited action.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:47 pm to ClayAguayo
why would you post this with an alter? What a horrible thread.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:49 pm to ClayAguayo
For everyone's sake OP, please don't have any kids. Only Lord knows how dumb your kids will be considering how retarded you are.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:51 pm to lsusportsman2
quote:
For everyone's sake OP, please don't have any kids. Only Lord knows how dumb your kids will be considering how retarded you are
I'll give OP the benefit of the doubt. I don't think he's dumb, I just think he's really REALLY biased.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:52 pm to ClayAguayo
Insecure U strikes again
Posted on 8/17/16 at 12:55 pm to ClayAguayo
You are funny, but not hilarious. Stats prove that out. 
Page 5 of 7
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News