Started By
Message
re: Joel Klatt on LSU. Is this true Tigers?
Posted on 10/13/16 at 1:14 am to NashBamaFan
Posted on 10/13/16 at 1:14 am to NashBamaFan
Huh? No LSU does not get every single prospect from the state but they get most of the guys they want, and they also have a huge pipeline into Texas. recruiting has no been an issue for LSU since 1995
1
Posted on 10/13/16 at 1:14 am to John Maplethorpe
quote:
LSU is just an ok job, not a top tier job.
A corndog somewhere just got mad af
Posted on 10/13/16 at 1:16 am to lsufball19
quote:
There are jobs that were elite in the 70s-90s that aren't elite jobs today and vice versa.
Yeah, the OP is an idiot.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 1:17 am to NashBamaFan
quote:
What is talent in the state worth if you can't hold onto it? Obviously this was an issue before NS got there and continues to be a problem since he left. That's a fact! How many guys from the state go elsewhere every year?! If you can't hold onto them , then that argument holds no water.
LSU does great in State. In fact, it's doing as well now as when Saban coached.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 1:18 am to Lsuchs
Klatt's an SEC-hating douchebag!
Posted on 10/13/16 at 1:32 am to John Maplethorpe
im claiming 3, you can claim 2 if you want.
We were top 10 in 1970, 1986 and 1987.
The 70s were 1970-1979, the 80s 1980-1989 and so on IMO.
Yes the 20th century was technically 1901 to 2000, but decades can go either way when saying 70s 80s and 90s. since you are so dead set on low balling I'll go with 3.
Decades
Your OP said 70s 80s and 90s. Once you realized how off that was you went from "1971-2000" to try and minimize the damage.
We were top 10 in 1970, 1986 and 1987.
The 70s were 1970-1979, the 80s 1980-1989 and so on IMO.
Yes the 20th century was technically 1901 to 2000, but decades can go either way when saying 70s 80s and 90s. since you are so dead set on low balling I'll go with 3.
Decades
Your OP said 70s 80s and 90s. Once you realized how off that was you went from "1971-2000" to try and minimize the damage.
This post was edited on 10/13/16 at 1:46 am
Posted on 10/13/16 at 1:45 am to John Maplethorpe
quote:
This year he's taken a special interest in a&m calling them a fraud and doubling down each week.
Who gaf?
Posted on 10/13/16 at 1:56 am to Lsuchs
quote:
im claiming 3, you can claim 2 if you want.
The correct answer is 3. Sounds like Klatt just needs to check his facts before he runs that big mouth.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 1:58 am to Lsuchs
Look at all the non LSU fans making asses of themselves in this thread.
Sometimes it's best to just ignore a thread instead of attempting to troll it
Sometimes it's best to just ignore a thread instead of attempting to troll it
Posted on 10/13/16 at 2:01 am to TigerMond84
quote:
Saban was at Michigan State just as long, did they win 2 conference titles and a national title?
No. But they were also on major NCAA probation when he took over in 1995. And Saban has stated he didn't develop the so-called "Process" until after their win over Ohio State in 1998. That is when Nick Saban the Head Coach was truly born.
This post was edited on 10/13/16 at 2:02 am
Posted on 10/13/16 at 3:34 am to Lsuchs
50+
Look, prior to Nick, LSU had no more national relevancy than a Colorado or Clemson. Occasionally win a conference title; occasionally go to a major bowl game. But in those days, only a couple games a week were televised nationally. So unless you were consistently vying for NCs or appeared in NY Day bowls you just weren't real well known. Plus, the national media back then (the networks) were centered in the northeast. A southern school that wasn't particularly accomplished simply wasn't nationally relevant.
Look, prior to Nick, LSU had no more national relevancy than a Colorado or Clemson. Occasionally win a conference title; occasionally go to a major bowl game. But in those days, only a couple games a week were televised nationally. So unless you were consistently vying for NCs or appeared in NY Day bowls you just weren't real well known. Plus, the national media back then (the networks) were centered in the northeast. A southern school that wasn't particularly accomplished simply wasn't nationally relevant.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 3:46 am to SoFla Tideroller
Ole Miss / Bama / Arky / aTm / Gators if we ever play the game
All you dudes need to do is worry about the coach we now have in 2016 ~~~
All you dudes need to do is worry about the coach we now have in 2016 ~~~
Posted on 10/13/16 at 5:13 am to Lsuchs
quote:
70-90s were our "mediocre" stretch though I guess.. Only 3 top 10 finishes, with 3 more all the way down at #11.
70: #7
71: #11
72: #11
73: #13
82: #11
84: #15
85: #20
86: #10
87: #5
88: #19
96: #12
97: #13
You listed three top ten finishes, unfortunately 1970 is part of the 60's. Thanks for pointing out that Klatt was almost correct.
Glad to see that you've received so many upvotes for your research.
This post was edited on 10/13/16 at 5:15 am
Posted on 10/13/16 at 5:17 am to lsufball19
quote:
No Les Miles did not get every single prospect from the state but he got most of the guys he wanted, and he also had a huge pipeline into Texas. recruiting has not been an issue for LSU since Nick Saban
Posted on 10/13/16 at 5:23 am to John Maplethorpe
We will handle things just fine in BR - just worry about beating the team in front of your team !!!
Posted on 10/13/16 at 5:29 am to John Maplethorpe
quote:
You're right I typed too fast. Meant to say 1 in 30 years which I heard from a supposed expert. Turns out it was 2.
They don't get it. I'd just give up if I were you.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 6:42 am to Warrior Poet
You are a historically mediocre team at best.... currently also...
Posted on 10/13/16 at 7:07 am to TigerMond84
He's not SMU - he's just another butt hurt Aggy troll. And the vast majority of teams in 70s & 80s would have traded their football success for LSU's in almost every year - including the Aggies. There are even years in the latter half of the dark decade of the 1990s that most football programs would have happily traded their success for LSU's.
Ignorant troll is just ignorant.
Ignorant troll is just ignorant.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 7:18 am to Farmer1906
I know everyone on this board hates every tv and/or radio guy, but I think Klatt is really good.
He said on radio just a couple days ago that LSU is a top 3/5 job and any coach would be a fool not to give it a look.
He said on radio just a couple days ago that LSU is a top 3/5 job and any coach would be a fool not to give it a look.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 7:22 am to John Maplethorpe
quote:
LSU was just an ok job, now its a top tier job.
FIFY! You do realize the 90s were close to 20 years ago right? But, yeah...don't worry about us getting a top tier coach
Page 4 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News