Started By
Message
re: How common are gay football players in the SEC?
Posted on 2/6/14 at 8:46 pm to Rebellious
Posted on 2/6/14 at 8:46 pm to Rebellious
quote:
Depends on how you define it. From the statistics I have seen, 3-4% are likely "totally gay", but another 5-6% are actively bisexual, and about 25% have had some kind of sexual experience with another guy at least one time in their lives (although most of these are primarily heterosexual).
All of these numbers are pretty far off. The 3-5% includes those who identify as bisexual. And the number who've had a homosexual experience is usually reported below 10%.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 8:48 pm to Stonehog
quote:
Percentage wise, California isn't gayer than any other state.
Completely false. The reported prevalence of homosexuality is highly variable with relation to location and culture.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 8:48 pm to Projectpat
quote:
Pretty sure biological traits aren't random, but ok.
Did I say they were? It's not like they're breeding gays out in California.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 8:54 pm to the808bass
quote:
Completely false. The reported prevalence of homosexuality is highly variable with relation to location and culture.
Wrong, admitting that you're gay is highly variable on location and culture, being gay is not.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 8:55 pm to Stonehog
You're making a statement of faith which is unsupported by data.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 8:56 pm to the808bass
Already provided the data earlier in this thread.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 8:58 pm to Stonehog
Data that says that homosexuality's prevalence is unchanged across time, culture and geography? Lol. No. You didn't.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 9:01 pm to Stonehog
Kinsey's study used prisoners in jail and normalized that data to the general population. Ridiculous.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 9:02 pm to the808bass
quote:
homosexuality's prevalence is unchanged across time, culture and geography?
It is.
Ever heard of the fricking Greeks?
How about Game of Thrones? Gay as hell, and that was like a thousand years ago.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 9:09 pm to Stonehog
quote:
Wrong, admitting that you're gay is highly variable on location and culture, being gay is not
Bout to make this shitty thread shitier (no pun intended)
If you had to choose one, would you bang a dude, your sister or a goat?
Posted on 2/6/14 at 9:13 pm to Stonehog
Yes. I have heard of the Greeks. The presence of homosexuality in multiple cultures throughout time < > the same prevalence or even incidence rates across time and culture. That's a pretty basic idea and is really unarguable.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 9:15 pm to Stonehog
I agree, with goat, legal to kill and cook a goat later.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 9:20 pm to Stonehog
quote:
Did I say they were? It's not like they're breeding gays out in California.
No, but an area where more people of a certain biological trait live naturally has a higher rate of that trait in offspring. Assuming homosexuality is a biological trait, that makes it more likely that a child in California is born during an awkward silence. Even if you assume a majority of gay couples adopt instead of using sperm donors or surrogate mothers, it still creates a gene pool with a higher chance of passing a homosexual trait on to offspring. Using bisexuality further increases that chance that a Californian child is born with traits of heterosexuality.
All of that assumes homosexuality is biological and purely so. If environment can alter sexual orientation, again, California's likelihood of a non-hetero child guys up.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 9:21 pm to the808bass
quote:
That's a pretty basic idea and is really unarguable.
Unarguable? Hardly. Culture has nothing to do with being gay. Admitting that one is gay is affected by culture.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 9:23 pm to Stonehog
Bama Bangs= Flaming Gayness.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 9:24 pm to Stonehog
You don't even understand what I'm saying. You're kind of dumb. No offense. Good luck.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 9:28 pm to the808bass
quote:
You don't even understand what I'm saying. You're kind of dumb. No offense. Good luck.
Hurr durr, ur dum.
frick off, bigot.
Posted on 2/6/14 at 9:32 pm to Stonehog
Still haven't grasped a bit of it.
Is there a variation of genetic traits across ethnicities? (Charitably assuming for the moment that homosexuality is a one-to-one correspondence with genetics which is patently false.)
Of course there is. Therefore, asserting that there would be no difference in the incidence or prevalence of a "gay gene" across time, cultures and ethnicities is something not even smart people argue.
You passed your depth about 15 posts ago.
Is there a variation of genetic traits across ethnicities? (Charitably assuming for the moment that homosexuality is a one-to-one correspondence with genetics which is patently false.)
Of course there is. Therefore, asserting that there would be no difference in the incidence or prevalence of a "gay gene" across time, cultures and ethnicities is something not even smart people argue.
You passed your depth about 15 posts ago.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News