Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/19/16 at 7:35 pm to nc14
Not targeting. That isn't the crown of his helmet.
Nope, not at all....
ETA: I thought that Rueben could have easily been flagged as well.
This post was edited on 9/19/16 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 9/19/16 at 7:37 pm to bbvdd
Nice still... plus - he launched
Posted on 9/19/16 at 7:38 pm to bbvdd
When a man becomes a runner, he is not defenseless
Posted on 9/19/16 at 7:45 pm to bbvdd
Great photo. Top of the facemask right to the breastbone. That's how it's done. Not even close to targeting. I did feel so bad for Hurts though that I didn't even think to cheer for the Rebs play until Youngblood was inside the ten.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 7:45 pm to bmy
I'm not sure. Can you get an FBI ruling on this?
Posted on 9/19/16 at 7:46 pm to VivaZapata27
quote:
Top of the facemask right to the breastbone. That's how it's done. Not even close to targeting.
You're a special kind of stupid aren't you.
Congrats
Posted on 9/19/16 at 7:47 pm to bbvdd
No. But you are a special type of homer.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 7:47 pm to bmy
Gary thought one was a GREAT hit while the other one was targeting 
Posted on 9/19/16 at 7:50 pm to bbvdd
So what?
Posted on 9/19/16 at 7:51 pm to Ancient Astronaut
Both very similar and probably should have been flagged with the new pussyfied rules. We have been flagged and player ejected for less.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 7:52 pm to sorantable
quote:
Why are Bama fans such pussies?
How can I disagree?
Posted on 9/19/16 at 7:55 pm to CCTider
quote:
I was thinking this was a question for the Aggies, and not a football question.
Underrated post.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 7:57 pm to nc14
Not a fan of the rule but, it has been written and refined. As a result it is Cleary defined., The hit on Hurts was a foul, the hit on Kelly was not
Posted on 9/19/16 at 7:59 pm to butchvan
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/19/16 at 8:01 pm
Posted on 9/19/16 at 8:00 pm to butchvan
Stop it. Hurts hit was not. Prove me wrong.
The kid took an open blindside shot(OUR fault) and scraped himself off of the mat and fought to victory. I will take that lesson everyday, everyday
The kid took an open blindside shot(OUR fault) and scraped himself off of the mat and fought to victory. I will take that lesson everyday, everyday
Posted on 9/19/16 at 8:00 pm to VivaZapata27
quote:
The hit on Kelly was forcible contact to the head. It's part of what constitutes targeting, but didn't meet all the requirements.
FIFY.
Posted on 9/19/16 at 8:01 pm to VivaZapata27
morePosted on 9/19/16 at 8:04 pm to nc14
I'm not crying. The TD we had taken off the board was the only issue I had with officiating. That and the game was too damned long. The only thing I have to cry about is our ball security. Which has been poor
Posted on 9/19/16 at 8:05 pm to nc14
kelly lowered his head ... he didn't initiate the contact as foster did, so that absolves him ... regardless of anyone's opinion about the rule, it's here to stay if you want football around in 30 years ... it's a good rule but until a rb or wr is flagged for lowering their head into the defender's head, it's a stupid rule ... foster probably should've been called for not keeping his head up, same as the ole miss defender ... neither qb quit, so it's a moot pt ...
says a lot about their toughness ... most badasses on here would've gone home ...
says a lot about their toughness ... most badasses on here would've gone home ...
This post was edited on 9/19/16 at 8:07 pm
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News