Started By
Message
re: Hate to say it, but West Virginia might be a diamond in the rough in the future.
Posted on 6/2/15 at 10:39 pm to jefffan
Posted on 6/2/15 at 10:39 pm to jefffan
since I'm getting a crash course on these expansion/realignment ideas, Virginia and North Carolina schools would be the only areas that make sense.
With that being said, none of them will leave.
conclusion: this conversation is just for fun and we stay at 14 teams
With that being said, none of them will leave.
conclusion: this conversation is just for fun and we stay at 14 teams
This post was edited on 6/2/15 at 10:45 pm
Posted on 6/2/15 at 10:45 pm to CCTider
quote:
Since you had to make the same part twice...
Ok, so you're linking a video where no LSU fan got arrested or even charged.
Meanwhile, I can link, if I chose, incidents with Alabama fans where one Alabama fan murdered another over a loss, Harvey Updike, the teabagger, and the crazy sugar bowl fan...
quote:
y'all are cool, but y'all aren't saints either.
Compared to Alabama fans? Yeah, we are saints.
Like apples?
Posted on 6/2/15 at 10:48 pm to Cheese Grits
The ACC has already been poached by the Big 10.
The SEC would take UNC and UVA in a heartbeat and wouldn't give a frick what the Big 10 did from there.
The SEC would take UNC and UVA in a heartbeat and wouldn't give a frick what the Big 10 did from there.
Posted on 6/2/15 at 10:49 pm to Cheese Grits
Disagree slightly. SEC wants to grow the SECN and the easiest way to do that( other than ESPN charging out the arse for it on a per subscriber basis) is to add teams from states we don't have teams in.
If we're not going to add teams from the ACC where do you suggest we get them? Oklahoma?
I see the BIG being the actor in the round, which will happen eventually. Kansas/Texas/ISU are the AAU schools left in Big 12. Other than Texas (Which may or may not have thE LHN expire by then), I don't see an option for them. They already have Iowa, and Kansas might as well be Iowa TV sets wise.
Seeing as how hey just added Maryland and Rutgers, I say they look East. There are a crapton ton of East Coast AAU schools to choose from (From BC all the way down to GT) just a matter of who they ask and who says yes.
If we're not going to add teams from the ACC where do you suggest we get them? Oklahoma?
I see the BIG being the actor in the round, which will happen eventually. Kansas/Texas/ISU are the AAU schools left in Big 12. Other than Texas (Which may or may not have thE LHN expire by then), I don't see an option for them. They already have Iowa, and Kansas might as well be Iowa TV sets wise.
Seeing as how hey just added Maryland and Rutgers, I say they look East. There are a crapton ton of East Coast AAU schools to choose from (From BC all the way down to GT) just a matter of who they ask and who says yes.
Posted on 6/2/15 at 10:49 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
The rest of the Big 12 looks down on you as well. I really think yall are fricked if (when?) the Big 12 implodes. I just don't see a soft landing spot for you.
Why do you say the Big 12 looks down on us? I've seen and heard almost all positive things related to WVU and the Big 12.
If the Big 12 falls apart, yes we are in a bad spot, I'd hope we'd find a decent landing spot.
Posted on 6/2/15 at 10:51 pm to JesusQuintana
and now that the Braves are tied, I'm no longer bored.
this thread is dead to me.
thanks for the info JesusQ, Cheese Grits and Jefan
this thread is dead to me.
thanks for the info JesusQ, Cheese Grits and Jefan
Posted on 6/2/15 at 10:52 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
YES YES frickING YES!
I'd forgotten about that crazy broad.
Posted on 6/2/15 at 10:54 pm to mtheob17
quote:
i want to hear your theory on what would be the next two teams and the reasons why.
a) Until the next round of TV deals I see no expansion of the SEC taking place
b) I can see the PAC taking 2 more teams from the B12 in say 2024 if those 2 teams are say Texas and Oklahoma
c) If the B12 dies it will become another AAC type conference but even then it does not dictate the remaining 4 conferences must go to 16.
d) Between now and then I can see Notre Dame joining the ACC full time and some schools pulling a Tulane and withdrawing from the remaining Power 4 just to not have to keep up with the arms race.
Realignment is about contraction, not expansion, as power schools acting in their own best interest will want to have bigger slices of the pies not smaller ones. University of Chicago was one of the top sports schools (especially college football) before WWII. Instead of staying in the B1G they dropped out to focus on academics and research. While we may mourn the loss of Alonzo Stagg and the college football history it was replaced with a top research institution (remember the Manhattan Project) and a massive endowment now approaching 8 Billion dollars.
20 years from now you may have 4 power conferences with 12 members each and real realignment will be complete. Look at the pro sports and they seem to understand a saturation point is reached then consolidation occurs and things go on from there. Aside from the B1G and SEC, none of the remaining 3 conferences has real staying power from top to bottom.
Realignment is not driven by the fans so when thing about it and and discussing it take off your fan hat and replace it with the hat of a business executive or politician or college president. Those are the guys actually making the calls and unless you think like they do you will get the move wrong every time.
Posted on 6/2/15 at 10:56 pm to Cheese Grits
quote:
Cheese Grits
Preach
Posted on 6/2/15 at 10:56 pm to JesusQuintana
No way. Those schools (North Carolina, Virginia, Virginia Tech and Duke are set in ACC stone).
Why do you keep bringing up these schools?
Stop!
West Virginia is a GREAT Value in our current market and has nothing but potential at this point in time.
Why do you keep bringing up these schools?
Stop!
West Virginia is a GREAT Value in our current market and has nothing but potential at this point in time.
Posted on 6/2/15 at 10:59 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
The SEC would take UNC and UVA in a heartbeat and wouldn't give a frick what the Big 10 did from there.
You are so wrong on this as you to not really understand just how interconnected the ACC and SEC are. They all share the same DNA going back to the days when Dr Dudley first created the SIAA (interestingly enough, TAMU was a member back then as well, and here they are 100 years later back in the SEC)
Posted on 6/2/15 at 10:59 pm to Mister Tee
If by great value you mean that they'll cause the other schools to make less money from day 1 and going forward, then I agree completely.
Posted on 6/2/15 at 11:03 pm to Ash'sProstheticHand
It is not always about money. Why do you not understand that?
Posted on 6/2/15 at 11:05 pm to Mister Tee
I agree. I think we should dump Auburn to the B-12 and swap for WVU. Lil brother syndrome makes you little frickers delirious. At least WVU doesn't have that problem and we keep the entire Alabama market with the SEC football Kings.
Posted on 6/2/15 at 11:06 pm to Mister Tee
I bring them up because they are the only schools that are geographically and financially viable.
I agree though. They aren't moving, so therefore, neither is the SEC.
West Virginia is a complete non starter. 0 chance of that happening.
I agree though. They aren't moving, so therefore, neither is the SEC.
West Virginia is a complete non starter. 0 chance of that happening.
Posted on 6/2/15 at 11:11 pm to Mister Tee
quote:
It is not always about money. Why do you not understand that?
Ok let's say WVU is 15. Then you need another for the schedule. Who is 16?
Posted on 6/2/15 at 11:15 pm to PanhandleDawg
You (Mississippi State) should dump Auburn to the Big 12?
And "Swap for WVU".
Interesting.
And "Swap for WVU".
Interesting.
Posted on 6/2/15 at 11:19 pm to Mister Tee
quote:
It is not always about money.
Of course it is. All changes instituted to CFB in the last 10 years or so were 100%, unapologetic money grabs.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News