Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/18/14 at 1:18 pm to allin2010
quote:
Not sure if trolling
Really?
Posted on 2/18/14 at 1:18 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
quote:
Yet yall will start 5 threads a day until it happens
Au fans have started 5 threads today about this?
They got to 5 by using Bama Math... I only see one... surprised he did not say 15...
Posted on 2/18/14 at 1:18 pm to RT1941
quote:
Question: Since Gus wants the rule changes addressed in a "rule change year", what happens to the targeting rule getting changed and the 15 yr penalty dismissed when the "targeting" call gets reversed?
Does Gus want that proposal to get sidelined until a rule change year also?
The NCAA has an exception which allows for player safety and correction of recently introduced rules to be addressed every year. Basically, Gus is saying it's not for player safety, so let's handle this by protocol.
Posted on 2/18/14 at 1:19 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
No, its dead on.
OK I will let your melt continue...Carry on
Posted on 2/18/14 at 1:20 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
I love when people try and troll me
This post was edited on 2/18/14 at 1:21 pm
Posted on 2/18/14 at 1:20 pm to RT1941
If Saban is being deceitful, (WHICH HE IS, where is his statement or interview) if he showed up at the annual AFCA rules meeting to talk about the tempo offense as it relates to potential injuries just to bend ears and gain an advantage on the field (Which most agree he has), he’s not the coach we think he is (he is not).
He’s just some fraud who has somehow stumbled arse-backward into coaching and developing a monster program that recruits and wins multiple national championships on its own.
He’s just some fraud who has somehow stumbled arse-backward into coaching and developing a monster program that recruits and wins multiple national championships on its own.
Posted on 2/18/14 at 1:20 pm to DaBama
quote:
So which is Ellis Johnson?
A whiny bitch as well.
Posted on 2/18/14 at 1:21 pm to allin2010
Posted on 2/18/14 at 1:21 pm to TreyAnastasio
Who's trolling? YOU and only you. I just call it like I see it. Horrible analogy and you continue to melt. It is pretty simple and plain to see.
This post was edited on 2/18/14 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 2/18/14 at 1:22 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Uh-huh
Posted on 2/18/14 at 1:24 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:
A whiny bitch as well.
Well played sirPosted on 2/18/14 at 1:25 pm to TreyAnastasio
Posted on 2/18/14 at 1:26 pm to tkane311
quote:
Narcissists, psychopaths, sadists or Machiavellian?
Yes, maybe, yes, definitely
This post was edited on 2/18/14 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 2/18/14 at 1:27 pm to elposter
quote:
many of the officials seem incompetent/inconsistent with the current format of running to spot the ball as fast as they can, checking to see if the offensive team subbed, making decisions about whether to stand over the ball / not stand over the ball / how long to stand over the ball, in addition to making all of the other pre-snap penalty determinations they have to make. I think eventually we will see some rule that addresses this and give some uniformity / clarity to help the officials.
Yep, the rule change in 2008 that moved from the 25 sec clock to the 40 sec clock and how the refs made play ready is the issue. The 10 sec rule is just a counter to the unintended consequences of the 40 sec clock.
Basically if that rule change would not have happened then coaches like Gus wouldn't be nearly as successful. Kudos to them for taking advantage of a rule change.
Posted on 2/18/14 at 1:27 pm to DoreonthePlains
quote:
Question: Since Gus wants the rule changes addressed in a "rule change year", what happens to the targeting rule getting changed and the 15 yr penalty dismissed when the "targeting" call gets reversed?
Does Gus want that proposal to get sidelined until a rule change year also?
quote:I see. So the proposal was put on the table under the premise of player safety (a hot topic that gets tons of attention.) Roger Retting says that absent facts to prove safety is an issue that it's just a "common sense" approach taken by the promoters of the proposal.
The NCAA has an exception which allows for player safety and correction of recently introduced rules to be addressed every year. Basically, Gus is saying it's not for player safety, so let's handle this by protocol.
Gus says it's not for player safety so the proposal will get sidelined till next year?
I wonder what the committee will do? 'Cause this shite is scheduled to got to a vote in a few short weeks.
Posted on 2/18/14 at 1:28 pm to tkane311
I'm actually beginning to think Trey's alter is coachcrisp due to the different laughing emoticons they use on every troll post.
Posted on 2/18/14 at 1:28 pm to undecided
@JamesCrepea: Malzahn said "there is absolutely zero evidence" that fast-pace offenses cause more player injuries.
^^^Defies logic and physics and only cares about winning. Doesn't care for his players.^^^
^^^Defies logic and physics and only cares about winning. Doesn't care for his players.^^^
Posted on 2/18/14 at 1:29 pm to Schwaaz
link?
Posted on 2/18/14 at 1:29 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
I just laugh when people say things that amuse me
Page 5 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News