Started By
Message
Gamecocks lock down $71.5 million, 10 year deal, with Under Armor ....
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:15 pm
Who has a bigger deal? Is it Bama? Tennessee? LSU? I'm not sure but I figure someone will know ...
ETA: The answer is Auburn ... they have the most lucrative deal in the SEC at $78 million over ten years. See below.
LINK
quote:
South Carolina’s Board of Trustees on Friday is poised to approve a 10-year, $71.5 million deal with Under Armour.
The contract represents the second-biggest deal in SEC and seventh nationally.
The previous agreement with Under Armour was set to run out on June 30, 2016.
The Gamecocks have been fully under Under Armour’s umbrella since 2011, after the football team first agreed to come over in 2007.
Read more here: https://www.thestate.com/sports/college/university-of-south-carolina/usc-football/article61328227.html#storylink=cpy
ETA: The answer is Auburn ... they have the most lucrative deal in the SEC at $78 million over ten years. See below.
LINK
This post was edited on 2/19/16 at 2:23 pm
13
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:16 pm to scrooster
Is that it?
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:17 pm to scrooster
Auburn does
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:17 pm to scrooster
Thanks SC. You just got UF, LSU, UG, Bama and probably Auburn all new and better contracts soon. 
This post was edited on 2/19/16 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:17 pm to Serraneaux
quote:
Is that it?
Is it Florida that has the bigger deal in the conference?
I dunno, that's why I am asking.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:17 pm to scrooster
get dem checks. Under Armor is going big right now. Steph Curry, Jordan Spieth, Tom Brady, Cam Newton, Notre Dame, the Rock.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:18 pm to scrooster
A&M is the highest in the nation if I'm not mistaken
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:18 pm to roadGator
We just signed a new deal better than that one.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:19 pm to scrooster
Not bad old timer
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:19 pm to scrooster
auburn at 78 million
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:19 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
Auburn does
I'm pretty sure that you are incorrect. SCAR has a bigger Under Armor deal, alone, than Auburn.
No, it's going to be Bama with Nike I'm fairly sure but I dunno ... that's why I'm asking.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:19 pm to auzach91
"WE MUST PROTECT THESE ROOSTERS!"
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:20 pm to auzach91
quote:
auburn at 78 million
I'll be dang ... I stand corrected. You are 100% correct.
Auburn extends apparel deal with Under Armour; contract is most lucrative in SEC
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:21 pm to scrooster
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:22 pm to scrooster
Unlike most schools, we don't take cash from Nike.
We take equipment and clothing from them and then get royalties (14% for everything but shoes).
I think it's always been like this with us and Nike so there must be some benefit to it or Foley wouldn't have re-inked a similar deal.
We take equipment and clothing from them and then get royalties (14% for everything but shoes).
I think it's always been like this with us and Nike so there must be some benefit to it or Foley wouldn't have re-inked a similar deal.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:22 pm to UAtide11
quote:
Jordan Spieth
Under Armor looks so silly to me in golf
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:22 pm to scrooster
Yeah I'm pretty sure, could be wrong, that the "second in the SEC" is indicating the second biggest Under Armor contract not the second biggest merchandising contract. the old reporters spin on this.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:23 pm to scrooster
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:24 pm to GameCocky88
quote:
Yeah I'm pretty sure, could be wrong, that the "second in the SEC" is indicating the second biggest Under Armor contract not the second biggest merchandising contract. the old reporters spin on this.
Evidently not ...
https://www.businessinsider.com/biggest-ncaa-athletic-apparel-contracts-2015-9
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:25 pm to roadGator
quote:
Unlike most schools, we don't take cash from Nike.
We take equipment and clothing from them and then get royalties (14% for everything but shoes).
I think it's always been like this with us and Nike so there must be some benefit to it or Foley wouldn't have re-inked a similar deal.
Yeah, the UF deal is a bit different. I think the value of UF's actual contract is somewhere around $4 million annually + additional royalties.
This post was edited on 2/19/16 at 2:27 pm
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News