Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:27 pm to scrooster
quote:
The answer is Auburn
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:28 pm to texag7
quote:
A&M is the highest in the nation if I'm not mistaken
Adidas has a negative valuation, so you're automatically at the bottom.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:29 pm to roadGator
quote:
Thanks SC. You just got UF, LSU, UG, Bama ....
Nike is for da poors.
quote:
... and probably Auburn all new and better contracts soon.
Auburn just re-upped their deal with Under Armour last October and they have the most lucrative deal in the conference right now.
A few other programs just recently re-upped their deals with Nike so they will not be getting new contracts anytime soon.
We had a bidding war going-on between Nike and Under Armour and last I heard Nike was way out in front in the $65 million range so this news today was a little surprising to me. I thought for sure we would be in Nike stuff next season, especially since Dawn Staley and Frank Martin were both pushing for Nike.
Maybe Under Armour is going to give Dawn Staley her own shoe like Nike did, I dunno.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:30 pm to scrooster
Why would a basketball school want under armor
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:30 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
So did Nike at first
Sure but Under Armor still seems like a stranger fit. Doesn't really matter though if they put the money into the sport.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:30 pm to SlowEasyConfident
quote:
Why would a basketball school want under armor
Why do you sheep-humpers also raise cows up there?
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:31 pm to rockiee
Steph Curry says hi.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:31 pm to scrooster
Pretty sure Bama's Nike contract is up for renegotiation in 2018.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:33 pm to GameCocky88
quote:
Steph Curry says hi
Under Armor in basketball doesn't seem as weird as golf to me.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:34 pm to rockiee
That was in response to the Basketball School comment by the hill folk.
ETA: also, if you're not rockin Titleist, frick you
ETA: also, if you're not rockin Titleist, frick you
This post was edited on 2/19/16 at 2:35 pm
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:35 pm to aspiclark
Alabama's seven year deal with Nike was inked in 2010, so next year brings a new deal.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:38 pm to bgator85
Can't find the royalty details but we receive 3.1M in equipment and clothing from Nike annually.
There's another $255,000 allowance for coaching staff clothing.
If Foley is trying to keep that royalty money quiet it's either a huge amount and he doesn't want other to know about it or it's a bust and he doesn't want others to know about it.
Since we just signed with Nike again, I'm assuming it's a good deal for UF.
There's another $255,000 allowance for coaching staff clothing.
If Foley is trying to keep that royalty money quiet it's either a huge amount and he doesn't want other to know about it or it's a bust and he doesn't want others to know about it.
Since we just signed with Nike again, I'm assuming it's a good deal for UF.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:43 pm to scrooster
nike >>>>>>>>>> under armor
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:54 pm to rockiee
quote:
Under Armor in basketball doesn't seem as weird as golf to me.
It's difficult to see what the UA golf strategy is. I don't think they intend to make equipment, only apparel. But it can't hurt to be the primary sponsor of the 22-year old best golfer in the world.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 2:55 pm to UAtide11
quote:
Cam Newton
Makes sense.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 3:01 pm to texag7
quote:
A&M is the highest in the nation if I'm not mistaken
I didnt know chip n dale magazine sponsored college football. Who knew?
Posted on 2/19/16 at 3:09 pm to ksayetiger
quote:
A&M is the highest in the nation if I'm not mistaken
Wasted money on a perennial bottom dweller
Posted on 2/19/16 at 3:09 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
nike >>>>>>>>>> under armor
For shoes and fan apparel, sure. But there are two primary reasons I'm glad USC stuck with UA.
The first is Nike's overuse of templates in their uniforms. Case in point, the sublimated image on the backs of all basketball jerseys right now. Most of the conference has it, and I don't like it.
The other reason I'm glad we didn't go with Nike is Nike's insistence on rebranding schools right now. They created new logos for Arkansas, UGA, Oregon State, and Arizona State for starters. With the exception of ASU, those rebranding efforts are underwhelming.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 3:09 pm to scrooster
quote:
Nike is for da poors.
Yea, just wait until we our current deal runs out in 2017 and let me know who is poor.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News