Started By
Message
re: Gamecocks lock down $71.5 million, 10 year deal, with Under Armor ....
Posted on 2/19/16 at 3:10 pm to RoyalAir
Posted on 2/19/16 at 3:10 pm to RoyalAir
quote:
The other reason I'm glad we didn't go with Nike is Nike's insistence on rebranding schools right now. They created new logos for Arkansas, UGA, Oregon State, and Arizona State for starters. With the exception of ASU, those rebranding efforts are underwhelming.
See, at Alabama we tell Nike what we will and won't do and they say "yes sir".
0
Posted on 2/19/16 at 3:16 pm to scrooster
About what A&M gets yearly except we will get our new bigger deal sooner and don't have to commit to 10 years.
IDK how UA works, but A&M buys at cost unlike Nike schools.
IDK how UA works, but A&M buys at cost unlike Nike schools.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 3:20 pm to scrooster
Under Armor is trash.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 4:39 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
nike >>>>>>>>>> under armor
Used to be ... not anymore.
Under Armour about to make dat move bruh.
I mean WTF are all you Nike homos gonna do when Under Armour signs Bama, etc?
The only thing Under Armour is missing is a great line of shoes ... but they are working on it.
Seriously though, change is inevitable. Under Armour will eventually surpass Nike, it's just a matter of time.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 4:56 pm to scrooster
quote:
Nike is for da poors
quote:
a $252 million deal with Ohio State University to extend its existing sponsorship by 15 years, escalating an arms race among sportswear makers and top sports schools.
Ohio State will receive $112 million in product from Nike and at least $103 million in cash, including royalty income, according to terms of the contract reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.
Posted on 2/19/16 at 5:10 pm to scrooster
quote:
Gamecocks lock down $71.5 million, 10 year deal, with Under Armor ....
Nike schools or GTFO
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News