Started By
Message
re: fumbles on 4th down.
Posted on 10/10/10 at 1:18 am to inelishaitrust
Posted on 10/10/10 at 1:18 am to inelishaitrust
quote:
When a snap is fumbled it's called a fumbled snap, no?
If it was snapped by the center to handoff to the QB.... Sure.
If it was snapped by the center to shotgun QB and over his head, then no.
0
Posted on 10/10/10 at 1:18 am to FightingTigers1
This pisser is going round and round on another part of the play
ETA - but I appreciate you putting it in this thread too cause he's been bouncing back and forth between the 2 threads
I think he must be a lawyer...a really bad one too
ETA - but I appreciate you putting it in this thread too cause he's been bouncing back and forth between the 2 threads
I think he must be a lawyer...a really bad one too
This post was edited on 10/10/10 at 1:20 am
Posted on 10/10/10 at 1:32 am to inelishaitrust
quote:
The NCAA rulebook couldn't be more vague or contradictory.
Not for those who understand it
quote:
When a snap is fumbled it's called a fumbled snap, no?
There can be no "fumbled snap". The snap is a backward pass....if the QB doesn't acheive possession, it's a muffed backward pass. It remains a muffed backward pass until someone gains possession.
Posted on 10/10/10 at 1:33 am to inelishaitrust
u can throw the ball off the ground backwards and that is a lateral dumass
Posted on 10/10/10 at 1:34 am to arrakis
no....when the QB is under center, it can be fumbled since the center "possessed" the ball first when he tried to "hand off" the ball to the QB
Posted on 10/10/10 at 1:38 am to dkreller
quote:
no....when the QB is under center, it can be fumbled since the center "possessed" the ball first when he tried to "hand off" the ball to the QB
You are wrong...you might not think you are; but that doesn't change the fact that you are. There can be no fumbled snap.
Posted on 10/10/10 at 1:40 am to arrakis
if you think that then you are as thick headed as that other dude
quote:
A fumble in American and Canadian football occurs when a player, who has possession and control of the ball loses it. By rule, it is any act other than passing, kicking or successful handing that results in loss of player possession.
Posted on 10/10/10 at 1:41 am to arrakis
Well that's good to know.
Posted on 10/10/10 at 1:42 am to inelishaitrust
quote:
that results in loss of player possesion"
Hey Douche Bag, when did possession change during the play?
Thanks for playing again, and GTFO & STFU
Posted on 10/10/10 at 1:48 am to dkreller
quote:
if you think that then you are as thick headed as that other dude
No, unlike dumbfricks like you, I know the rule book.
Read 2-12-1c and 2-19-2d and 2-23-1
Posted on 10/10/10 at 1:52 am to arrakis
why don't you post it hear for everyone to read?
we've already had this discussion and all you did was make mocking comments....which you do in all threads
not interested in going round and round and round with another dumbass
ETA - so go frick yourself
we've already had this discussion and all you did was make mocking comments....which you do in all threads
not interested in going round and round and round with another dumbass
ETA - so go frick yourself
This post was edited on 10/10/10 at 1:53 am
Posted on 10/10/10 at 1:57 am to dkreller
quote:
why don't you post it hear for everyone to read?
They can look it up for themselves and maybe they'll learn something by the effort.
I give the proper application of the rule and ignorant dumbfrick fantards want to argue about it.....
Posted on 10/10/10 at 2:03 am to arrakis
quote:
arrakis
<-------Knows not to argue with arrakis on FB Rules
Posted on 10/10/10 at 2:04 am to arrakis
quote:
proper application of the rule
I think the word you were looking for is "interpretation"
and only that can be given by NCAA officials....we can only hope to understand what it is they mean....and in your case it's a stretch
This post was edited on 10/10/10 at 2:05 am
Posted on 10/10/10 at 2:05 am to arrakis
How about you just face the facts about Urban as a coach. He is a below average SEC coach without Tebow. You can look at his time before he had Tebow to now. His little gimmick offense does not work against teams in the SEC without Tebow. Yall have way too much talent from recruiting every year to look this bad. Debose should be targeted more. Adazzio is the worst OC on the planet.
Posted on 10/10/10 at 2:08 am to FightingTigers1
flor= 
Posted on 10/10/10 at 2:12 am to dkreller
quote:
I think the word you were looking for is "interpretation"
and only that can be given by NCAA officials....we can only hope to understand what it is they mean....and in your case it's a stretch
No, I have the correct word because the sections include the A.R. But, you wouldn't know that, would you? lol
In your case, which is quoting a Wiki entry, you're a certified dumbfrick.
Posted on 10/10/10 at 2:13 am to FightingTigers1
quote:
How about you just face the facts about Urban as a coach. He is a below average SEC coach without Tebow.
Dude, he won the national title in 2006 with Tebow only playing a few snaps, not to mention how great he was at Utah with Alex Smith
Posted on 10/10/10 at 2:13 am to arrakis
Posted on 10/10/10 at 2:14 am to arrakis
arrakis you might have already said it in this thread but was the correct call made so the bitching can finally end?
Page 8 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News