Started By
Message
re: For Texas A&M Fans
Posted on 11/28/12 at 8:20 pm to KaiserSoze99
Posted on 11/28/12 at 8:20 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
I would like to note that Kent Motherfricking State will likely go to a better bowl than the sips--perhaps even a BCS bowl.
And better than A&M
Funny that Kent State/Northern Illinois will reach the BCS before A&M does this millenium
1
Posted on 11/28/12 at 8:23 pm to tiggerthetooth
BCS Bowls this millenium:
Oklahoma - 8
Texas - 4
TCU - 2
Texas A&M - 0
The schools that A&M fans are shitting on in this thread have them beat in the trophy case, so the A&M fans have to resort to using terms like "dumpster fire" to describe the Big 12 because they can't fall back on their accomplishments on the field.
If you can't beat them(the Big 12 oppositions) leave and them stomp your feet crowing how superior you are to them.
Oklahoma - 8
Texas - 4
TCU - 2
Texas A&M - 0
The schools that A&M fans are shitting on in this thread have them beat in the trophy case, so the A&M fans have to resort to using terms like "dumpster fire" to describe the Big 12 because they can't fall back on their accomplishments on the field.
If you can't beat them(the Big 12 oppositions) leave and them stomp your feet crowing how superior you are to them.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 8:23 pm to accnodefense
quote:
Funny that Kent State/Northern Illinois will reach the BCS before A&M does this millenium
Also funny that Texas has two choices:
1. Beat Kansas State, guaranteeing Oklahoma the conference title, putting them in the Cotton Bowl to face A&M, and likely cementing Manziel's Heisman.
2. Lose to Kansas State, guaranteeing a MAC team gets into the BCS over Oklahoma and getting them bumped down to the Alamo bowl to get destroyed by either UCLA or Stanford.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 8:27 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
Also funny that Texas has two choices:
1. Beat Kansas State, guaranteeing Oklahoma the conference title, putting them in the Cotton Bowl to face A&M, and likely cementing Manziel's Heisman.
2. Lose to Kansas State, guaranteeing a MAC team gets into the BCS over Oklahoma and getting them bumped down to the Alamo bowl to get destroyed by either UCLA or Stanford.
And A&M won't play in the Cotton Bowl because A&M and Slive won't allow it,
and you seem so fixated on Texas that they have accomplished more in the last 12 years than A&M has its entire existance,
with 4 BCS Bowls, 3 BCS Bowl wins, 2 Rose Bowl titles, a national championship, and 2 Big 12 titles, and won 9 out of 12 vs. Texas A&M
And A&M? A Meineke Car Care Bowl title. That's it.
And this is coming from me, a Texas hater.
I can't stand Texas, but A&M fans after leaving the Big 12 is like a boxer who gets killed in a fight then jaws about how great he is/how bad his opponent was after the fight.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 8:28 pm to accnodefense
quote:
because A&M and Slive won't allow it
We'll go wherever we're picked to go. We haven't been working behind the scenes to try to get pushed to a lower selection bowl.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 8:30 pm to BigBird09
How stupid are all of these replies..These dumbfricks would much rather have come over next year after having winning a NC, no question.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 8:41 pm to Tayday
quote:
These dumbfricks would much rather have come over next year after having winning a NC, no question.
What makes you think that we would have won anything of substance with Mike Sherman as head coach.
Let's say, hypothetically, that we did stay in the Big 12 this year.
1. Manziel would have never played a down at QB. Showers would have started and Joeckel would be the backup. That's the way Sherman is. He ALWAYS went with the upperclassman in certain positions regardless of anything else.
2. Tim DeRuyter would still have taken the Fresno State job, leaving the 2009 senior defenders with their third defensive coordinator in four years anyway.
Louisiana Tech = embarrassing season opening loss
at SMU = win
at Oklahoma State = loss
vs. Arkansas = tossup
Texas Tech = tossup
at Baylor = loss
Iowa State = win
at Missouri = loss
Oklahoma = loss
Kansas State = loss
at Kansas = win
at t.u. = loss
Worst case: 3-9
Best case: 5-7
Posted on 11/28/12 at 8:41 pm to Tayday
quote:
Texas that they have accomplished more in the last 12 years than A&M has its entire existance,
Completely false.
2 Heisman winners to 0
19 conference titles to 3
4 national championships to 1
2 wins over #1 to 0
Go back to horn phags.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 8:43 pm to John Maplethorpe
Nice, but we aren't counting self-awarded conference titles or national championships.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 8:45 pm to accnodefense
Its funny how the A&M fans here always make it a "Big 12 vs. SEC" debate because they can't hang their hat on their own accomplishments.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 8:56 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
I would like to note that Kent Motherfricking State will likely go to a better bowl than the sips--perhaps even a BCS bowl.
You are probably going to the same bowl as Texas you dumbass. This just gets more and more hilarious. You guys kill me.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 10:24 pm to tiggerthetooth
Love how a Sip says this. Look up that 1970 NC where you got blown out in your Bowl Game or how you have an asterick championship on your wall. Every A&M NC is an undefeated season and had multiple sources behind our claim.
Why don't you just go back and find a Big 12 Board to hang out with your Iowa State and Baylol buddies. Enjoy living in the past.
Why don't you just go back and find a Big 12 Board to hang out with your Iowa State and Baylol buddies. Enjoy living in the past.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 10:28 pm to aggressor
Funny how far back you have to go to find where A&M had success.
I can actually remember UT winning a national championship.
But wait, DeLoss Dodds conspirator supreme must have rigged the polls and the game vs A&M. Really A&M was the best that year too.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 10:30 pm to tiggerthetooth
why do you guys keep biting on this sips obvious troll bait? this thread needs to die
Posted on 11/28/12 at 10:34 pm to WestCoastAg
its even funnier that just because I disagree with the A&M attitude that I'm automatically a Texas fan.
The paranoia is far more real than I imagined. Texas truly is always on aggy minds. Probably need to grow up if you don't want to start creating SEC aggy jokes.
The paranoia is far more real than I imagined. Texas truly is always on aggy minds. Probably need to grow up if you don't want to start creating SEC aggy jokes.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 10:40 pm to tiggerthetooth
Genital warts. 
Posted on 11/28/12 at 11:09 pm to TeLeFaWx
quote:
Your conference has two power programs. The SEC has 7 or 8.
So what are the 7 or 8 SEC "power programs" ?
Posted on 11/28/12 at 11:12 pm to tiggerthetooth
quote:
So what are the 7 or 8 SEC "power programs" ?
EXHIBIT Z proving that you are NOT an LSU fan, but are IN FACT a butthurt, cum drinking, longhorn douch-nozzle.
You're not even pretending anymore.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 11:13 pm to KaiserSoze99
Just answer the question. Power programs from most logical perspectives in the SEC would be -LSU, Bama, and UF. Those are definitely elite programs. I can't come up with the other 4 or 5. I'll give you Georgia, but still leaves 3 or 4 more programs to be named.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 11:14 pm to tiggerthetooth
I have owned your buttfricking arse all over the place...and proved you to be a douchy, Daddy-obsessed longhorn bum surveyor, and that picture (which is pretty shitty work, by the way) is all you got?
Owned....again....
Owned....again....
Page 8 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News