Started By
Message
re: Does this guy have a perceived bias? Re: 2013 and 2012 Scheduling
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:37 pm to memphisplaya
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:37 pm to memphisplaya
quote:
I think what everyone is upset about is that while you dropped UGA for Mizzou, we dropped UK for A&M
You could also say that bama dropped Vandy for A&M
1
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:38 pm to SBC
quote:
Let's introduce Mark Womack
I'm related to him, btw.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:38 pm to NYCAuburn
Yeah, but that ruins our argument. Stay out of this!!
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:42 pm to SBC
Are you insinuating that b/c Mr Womack graduated from Ala. and worked there many yrs, he would be biased in giving them scheduling perks??!! How dare you Sir! How dare you!
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:43 pm to pvilleguru
quote:then why the frick do the conferences pay these guys? I could do that job for half of what they make.
but who's to say some of these just weren't pulled out of a hat and bama got the easier game?
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:44 pm to SBC
Bama grad helping his school. I love it. Of course he owe us for all the scheduling issues from the past.
This post was edited on 12/3/12 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:50 pm to baytiger
quote:
then why the frick do the conferences pay these guys? I could do that job for half of what they make.
They had to make up the majority of the schedules themselves, but there could have been a few cases where a few different teams could gave gone in a certain spot. That's where they may have randomly pulled a name.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:53 pm to pvilleguru
quote:
I'd rather play big games, but who's to say some of these just weren't pulled out of a hat and bama got the easier game?
So the conicidence defense. Got it.
Since Nick Saban arrived:
2008: UT, UGA, UK
2009: UT, USC, UK
2010: UT, UF, USC
2011: UT, UF, Vandy
2012: UT, Mizz (Mizz replaces UGA)
2013: UT, UK (Kentucky replaces UGA)
Any concidence that the one year in this 6 year run that Bama finshed 4th in the west was when they played 2 of the best 3 teams in the East and lost 3 games? Looks to me like Nick said no more of that guys after the 2010 season.
This post was edited on 12/3/12 at 1:05 pm
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:24 pm to SBC
quote:
2013: UT, UK (Kentucky replaces UGA)
Before expansion, UK was due to rotate onto Bama's schedule in '13 just like UGA was due to rotate onto LSU's schedule in '13.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:31 pm to SBC
Kentucky will be tough next year with coach stoops.
REC
REC
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:35 pm to SBC
LSU 2013 Schedule
Furman
Open Date
Alabama
Open Date
Texas A&M
Three weeks to get ready for Bama.
Two weeks to get ready for Texas A&M
The SEC Office sure has it in for LSU
Furman
Open Date
Alabama
Open Date
Texas A&M
Three weeks to get ready for Bama.
Two weeks to get ready for Texas A&M
The SEC Office sure has it in for LSU
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:41 pm to bigpapamac
quote:
Might have something to do with...
The mysterious move to drop UGA for mizzou and next years drop from UGA to Kentucky... It's okay, we picked them up for y'all.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:42 pm to sarc
quote:
Before expansion, UK was due to rotate onto Bama's schedule in '13 just like UGA was due to rotate onto LSU's schedule in '13.
We weren't due for scar this year. Your rotation theory is invalid.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:45 pm to reality_check
Dude, LSU plays east teams that went 14-2 this year, while Bama's east teams went 1-15. We can have as many bye weeks as we want. By the way Bama has a bye before lsu next year too.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:47 pm to RBWilliams8
quote:
We weren't due for scar this year. Your rotation theory is invalid
Did I say anything about '12? No, obviously that was a true bridge year because of expansion.
But numerous people keep asking, "Why did Bama get UK in '13 while LSU gets UGA?". It's not random nor is it some grand conspiracy to help Bama. It's based off what was supposed to happen before expansion.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:49 pm to RidiculousHype
quote:
2011: Florida, Tennessee, Kentucky
This was hard how?
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:50 pm to sarc
Why did Bama get the benefit in the bridge year? Why was Bama the only team in the west with more division games at home than on the road in 2012?
By the way 2013 is a bridge year too. So Bama benefits in both bridge years. Just seems hard to believe that Bama gets this benefit in the middle of their "dynasty". That and the schedule coordinator previously working in the Bama athletic department.
By the way 2013 is a bridge year too. So Bama benefits in both bridge years. Just seems hard to believe that Bama gets this benefit in the middle of their "dynasty". That and the schedule coordinator previously working in the Bama athletic department.
This post was edited on 12/3/12 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:50 pm to SBC
To me its not really about who has a tougher schedule because teams will go in cycles. Its more about me being a fan and wanting to play other teams more than once every 12 years. Seriously no one gives a frick about bama vs tenn. When we go to 16 teams they should just put ut, uga, aub and bama in one division.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:52 pm to TideSatchel
Where did Alabama's 2nd game against Vandy go, Mark Womack?
Posted on 12/3/12 at 1:52 pm to sarc
quote:
But numerous people keep asking, "Why did Bama get UK in '13 while LSU gets UGA?". It's not random nor is it some grand conspiracy to help Bama. It's based off what was supposed to happen before expansion.
Based off of, except you have to ignore that LSU has to go to Athens even though the last game was in Athens because adding them back this year without the 5-2-1 would cause a home away inequity because the rotation doesn't work right when you take a cog out.
Page 5 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News