Started By
Message
re: Does this guy have a perceived bias? Re: 2013 and 2012 Scheduling
Posted on 12/3/12 at 11:57 am to LsuTool
Posted on 12/3/12 at 11:57 am to LsuTool
So who actually took time to research this? I can't believe someone was upset enough to go through the alma maters of each SEC committee member. Talk about serious life issues.
1
Posted on 12/3/12 at 11:59 am to memphisplaya
idk, but I'd love to see a bios for everyone that works of the SEC.
I think it would be a rather interesting.
I think it would be a rather interesting.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:00 pm to LsuTool
Furman 
then a bye before and after Alabama?
then a bye before and after Alabama? Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:01 pm to crimsonsaint
Furman is good brah. They got that guy from the show two a days. Bye week after is needed to deal with that much swoop.
This post was edited on 12/3/12 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:01 pm to heartbreakTiger
quote:
SEC Digital Network: Who was involved in putting together the 2013 SEC conference football schedule and what additional groups had input? Mark Womack: “It was a cooperative effort from all of our athletic directors to take the schedule and try to work through it, along with Larry Templeton and Mark Whitworth in our office. We use a scheduling group outside the office from a computer standpoint of trying to generate some things for us. At the end of the day, the cooperation of each athletic director in trying to make this work is vitally important.”
SEC Digital Network: You mentioned the computer group that assists you with scheduling; how does that process work? Mark Womack: “They run different versions of what we give them as far as we’d like to keep certain games on certain dates and other parameters. They will produce the rotation of schedules and how that would work over a 12-year period. They can also assist us in trying to tell us whether, mathematically, we can do something or not. They will tell us that these games would fit in or there’s no way to schedule what we want to schedule.”
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:02 pm to crimsonsaint
quote:
Furman then a bye before and after Alabama?
Don't worry. The Alabama administration has already told its lacky Mark that no teams are to have bye weeks before and after Bama because it is inequitable and hurts competitive balance.
The rule will be in place for when bridge 3 is announced. Just need to see who is going to be 7 in the SECe next year before Bridge 3 can come out.
This post was edited on 12/3/12 at 12:04 pm
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:02 pm to reality_check
Computer group are bama alums too!
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:02 pm to reality_check
quote:Big 3.
Mark Womack Alabama
Larry Templeton was AD at Miss State
mark Whitworth is a Tenn guy
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:03 pm to TideSatchel
quote:
Big 3.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:08 pm to crimsonsaint
quote:
Furman then a bye before and after Alabama?
Dude, Bama has TWO fricking FCS schools on the schedule next yeat. TWO. No defending that shite.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:08 pm to crimsonsaint
quote:
Furman then a bye before and after Alabama?
look at you trying to spin this.
OOC means nothing. Bye's can be argued either way. Sometimes teams play well off of bye weeks sometimes they come out rusty. Its all about the East matchups.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:15 pm to therick711
Sweet
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:19 pm to Bench McElroy
MikeHoncho-- Who you callin pissy, PUSSY!
Bame alum pads cupcake schedule is cool with you--
You say if you dont win your division, you can't possibly be the best team in the conference. Did you raise t;hat issue at the end of 2011 season? I repeat--- You Mike Honcho, are the PUSSY!!
Bame alum pads cupcake schedule is cool with you--
You say if you dont win your division, you can't possibly be the best team in the conference. Did you raise t;hat issue at the end of 2011 season? I repeat--- You Mike Honcho, are the PUSSY!!
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:23 pm to crimsonsaint
Let's compare what Alabama's schedule would have been and what it was. We were supposed to play UT, Vandy, and UGA as our East opponents. Instead, we played aTm, UT, and Mizzou.
Our new schedule wasn't that much easier.
Our new schedule wasn't that much easier.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:24 pm to LsuTool
quote:
Its all about the East matchups
Before expansion, what East teams were scheduled to rotate onto Bama and LSU's schedules for the '13 season?
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:24 pm to melonheadla
quote:
melonheadla
I think you just got trolled.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:28 pm to sarc
quote:
LSU's schedules for the '13 season
Guessing UGA and SC, KY was supposed to be on there for 12
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:32 pm to pvilleguru
I think what everyone is upset about is that while you dropped UGA for Mizzou, we dropped UK for A&M. LSU was suppose to play At Lexington this year, and Bama at Athens. Expansion ended that.
Next year since the SEC office still can't decide on 8 or 9 games it's another bridged schedule.
Bama gets @UK and UT
LSU gets UF and @UGA
LSU has not been to Lexington since 07, but beat UGA in Athens in 09
Bama beat UK In Lexington in 09, but hasn't been to Athens since 08.
Your losses. I'm going to enjoy my trip to Athens
Next year since the SEC office still can't decide on 8 or 9 games it's another bridged schedule.
Bama gets @UK and UT
LSU gets UF and @UGA
LSU has not been to Lexington since 07, but beat UGA in Athens in 09
Bama beat UK In Lexington in 09, but hasn't been to Athens since 08.
Your losses. I'm going to enjoy my trip to Athens
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:36 pm to memphisplaya
quote:
Mark Womack: “It was a cooperative effort from all of our athletic directors to take the schedule and try to work through it, along with Larry Templeton and Mark Whitworth in our office. We use a scheduling group outside the office from a computer standpoint of trying to generate some things for us. At the end of the day, the cooperation of each athletic director in trying to make this work is vitally important.”
Wow...just wow. Working together huh? Sure, I work together with people all the time. You know what the consensus usually is? It is what the lead guy or head man says. We all leave the room in "consensus" though.
Posted on 12/3/12 at 12:36 pm to memphisplaya
I'd rather play big games, but who's to say some of these just weren't pulled out of a hat and bama got the easier game?
Page 4 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News