Started By
Message
re: Big 14 rankings - THE END ALL BE ALL, THE ALMIGHTY SEC RANKINGS
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:22 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:22 pm to SummerOfGeorge
By using AP only wouldn't you lose LSU's 03 NC? While the BCS recognizes LSU, the AP chose those thugs in Compton
This post was edited on 12/22/15 at 1:23 pm
1
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:22 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:Which is bullshite. The Rose Bowls of the 20s and 30s are more legit than a lot of poll era titles
a gracious way to not include our Rose Bowl Titles
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:22 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Tennessee at 2? Nice. Seems legit...
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:23 pm to genro
quote:
The Rose Bowls of the 20s and 30s are more legit than a lot of poll era titles
I agree, but it opens pandora's box so we just roll without it.
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:23 pm to TheCosbySweater
quote:
Tennessee at 2? Nice. Seems legit...
And where should Tennessee be all-time?
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:23 pm to TheCosbySweater
quote:
Tennessee at 2? Nice. Seems legit...
SEC football didn't start in 2008 dude
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:23 pm to SummerOfGeorge
You count 10 win seasons prior to 1933 but not conference championships?
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:24 pm to memphisplaya
quote:
By using AP only wouldn't you lose LSU's 03 NC? While the BCS recognizes LSU, the AP chose those thugs in Compton
Yes, which is why they have 2 - 1957 & 2007. Like I said above, you can add 2003 if you want, LSU doesn't change spots they just get 10 more pts.
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:24 pm to GeorgeReymond
quote:
You count 10 win seasons prior to 1933 but not conference championships?
The SEC started in 1933
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:27 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Rankings should only go back to 2000 when football started IMO
and Aggy's only for 2012, when they started trying
and Aggy's only for 2012, when they started trying
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:28 pm to cas4t
Sorry everyone, please let me know which criteria favors your team and I will be sure to jack up the pt value for it k thanks bye
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:29 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Where did you get the info on all Americans? I know A&M should have something like 60. Now if they're consensus or not, I don't know.
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:29 pm to SummerOfGeorge
All good bro
Just update the numbers and you and I will be fine
Just update the numbers and you and I will be fine
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:30 pm to Farmer1906
quote:
Where did you get the info on all Americans? I know A&M should have something like 60. Now if they're consensus or not, I don't know.
NCAA Football - All Americans
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:31 pm to cas4t
quote:
All good bro
Just update the numbers and you and I will be fine
#1 - Texas A&M : $156,478,587, however many pts and titles that buys
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:33 pm to SummerOfGeorge
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:34 pm to SummerOfGeorge
How about you take the total wins a program has, divide it by 5, round it, and add that total:
You'd get
Alabama - 715
Tennessee - 458
Georgia - 441
LSU - 398
Florida - 378
Arkansas - 371
Texas A&M - 370
Auburn - 358
You'd get
Alabama - 715
Tennessee - 458
Georgia - 441
LSU - 398
Florida - 378
Arkansas - 371
Texas A&M - 370
Auburn - 358
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:35 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
How about you take the total wins a program has, divide it by 5, round it, and add that total:
You'd get
Alabama - 715
Tennessee - 458
Georgia - 441
LSU - 398
Florida - 378
Arkansas - 371
Texas A&M - 370
Auburn - 358
Seems like when you mesh things together you get a pretty consistent grouping of
Alabama
Georgia/Tennessee
LSU/Florida/Arkansas/Texas A&M/Auburn
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:37 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
How about you take the total wins a program has, divide it by 5, round it, and add that total:
I'm not a math magician, why divide by 5?
Posted on 12/22/15 at 1:38 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
I'm not a math magician, why divide by 5?
Same reason I did something similar with AA's, dilute it a little more because there are so many wins compared to say national titles or SEC titles. If it isn't diluted then it becomes the highest % of the total.
You could just multiply it by 0.25 pts or something too. Either way, same result.
This post was edited on 12/22/15 at 1:39 pm
Page 2 of 5
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News