Started By
Message
re: Been reading some Clemson message boards..cocky bunch still.
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:12 pm to antibarner
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:12 pm to antibarner
Well they just lost a title game 48 hours ago that they could have won. Did you expect to go over there to find a Bama circle jerk?
0
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:14 pm to VaBamaMan
Yea, OP didn't do that on purpose
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:23 pm to cas4t
Wait, people actually care what other message board fans, who lost the national title game while we won it, are posting about our team?
Come on brah, come on.
Come on brah, come on.
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:24 pm to bisonduck
Clemson can dominate the ACC but they wouldn't make it through the SEC, we were knocking cats out left and right. They'd never make it through the SEC healthy but all they have to do is make it through the ACC and win two big games.
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:27 pm to antibarner
quote:
Not a single bit of credit to Alabama to be found LOL.
Gee... what fanbase does that sound like?
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:27 pm to antibarner
quote:
Not a single bit of credit to Alabama to be found LOL
This is fricking rich...
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:28 pm to Othello
Clemson would've wiped the floor this year with most of the teams in the SEC. Don't kid yourself.
They have depth, size, speed and a dynamic qb with a deep DL. The SEC's lack of qbs would make them a favorite on any given day against the SEC minus BAMA and even against Bama they're winning 4/10 times.
As far as your injury comment, I find more injuries occur against inferior opponents. I've never understood this. The only way this comes into play is when you build up big leads and it's not like Clemson doesn't get a full four quarters of competition from half their schedule.
They have depth, size, speed and a dynamic qb with a deep DL. The SEC's lack of qbs would make them a favorite on any given day against the SEC minus BAMA and even against Bama they're winning 4/10 times.
As far as your injury comment, I find more injuries occur against inferior opponents. I've never understood this. The only way this comes into play is when you build up big leads and it's not like Clemson doesn't get a full four quarters of competition from half their schedule.
This post was edited on 1/13/16 at 3:30 pm
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:29 pm to cas4t
quote:
Probably the best play call in a championship game that I've ever seen
Someone saw a weakness in the way Clemson lined up for kickoffs. Even with knowing that, you have to make a great kick and still complete the entire play. It was awesome
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:29 pm to bisonduck
You are really upset about nothing while trying to make it to be bigger than it really was. Are you going to be okay?
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:29 pm to antibarner
It is a real shame when a win isn't enough anymore
sorry that your national championship victory didn't also humble all of college football, and specifically Clemson to what you consider an acceptable level.
sorry that your national championship victory didn't also humble all of college football, and specifically Clemson to what you consider an acceptable level.
This post was edited on 1/13/16 at 3:30 pm
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:30 pm to Othello
quote:
Clemson can dominate the ACC but they wouldn't make it through the SEC, we were knocking cats out left and right. They'd never make it through the SEC healthy but all they have to do is make it through the ACC and win two big games.
Disagree, I think Clemson is built like the upper echelon SEC teams and would be just as good as any of the other very good teams in the conference.
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:30 pm to FourThreeForty
quote:
funny an LSU fan mentions gimmicky plays since that is/was Les Miles' claim to fame throughout his
No, it's funny because the SEC rant told us we were lucky to beat Florida by using a gimmicky fake field goal. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:31 pm to antibarner
OJ Howard just caught another wide-open pass for a TD.
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:32 pm to bisonduck
quote:
Clemson would've wiped the floor this year with most of the teams in the SEC. Don't kid yourself.
They have depth, size, speed and a dynamic qb with a deep DL. The SEC's lack of qbs would make them a favorite on any given day against the SEC minus BAMA and even against Bama they're winning 4/10 times.
As far as your injury comment, I find more injuries occur against inferior opponents. I've never understood this. The only way this comes into play is when you build up big leads and it's not like Clemson doesn't get a full four quarters of competition from half their schedule.
The thing the other conferences still do not understand is you may win a game in the SEC and still loose. It is a physical game, much more so than the other conferences. It is the reason why the SEC does so well head to head against other conferences. The difficulty in the SEC is sustaining the physical punishment of winning a game against a 5 or 6 win team only to turn around the next week and play a team that is more physical and better in every phase of the game. Clemson is SEC like, but watching Alabama punish them physically makes one wonder if they could stand up to the 8 league games.
This post was edited on 1/13/16 at 3:33 pm
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:34 pm to cas4t
It was a joke.
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:41 pm to SummerOfGeorge
I'm saying physically they could not endure a full season in the SEC. They were getting jacked up by Bama, Gallman would not make it through the SEC running that hard and taking on contact like that every week. Several of their players got hurt and did not come back in.
I'm not talking about talent.
I'm not talking about talent.
This post was edited on 1/13/16 at 3:42 pm
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:46 pm to antibarner
quote:See, that's where you fricked up.
reading some Clemson message boards
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:53 pm to Othello
quote:
I'm saying physically they could not endure a full season in the SEC. They were getting jacked up by Bama, Gallman would not make it through the SEC running that hard and taking on contact like that every week. Several of their players got hurt and did not come back in.
I'm not talking about talent.
Gallman was a tough son of bitch too that had defenders bouncing off him in the 4th quarter. Even the broadcaster noted that Clemson matched up physically with Bama. Anyway, the group think here is going to be one sided. So, continue.
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:53 pm to SummerOfGeorge
quote:
Disagree, I think Clemson is built like the upper echelon SEC teams and would be just as good as any of the other very good teams in the conference.
To all the non-Bama fans in this thread, keep dreaming. It took 5 turnovers for Ole Miss to hold on for dear life. No one else in the SEC plays the same brand of ball as Bama, or they'd have won 4 national titles in the last 7 years.
Posted on 1/13/16 at 3:54 pm to antibarner
Wow...what an ego!!!
Page 3 of 9
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News