Started By
Message
re: Auburn 2010 vs. Bama 2012
Posted on 7/25/13 at 8:59 pm to RollTide1987
Posted on 7/25/13 at 8:59 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
They are rated properly because of the Auburn teams that came before and after them.
2008: 5-7
2009: 8-5
2011: 8-5
2012: 3-9
that makes no sense.
1
Posted on 7/25/13 at 9:03 pm to Rebel Land Shark
No way. Bama would have dog stopped Oregon.
Posted on 7/25/13 at 9:03 pm to Bama Bird
quote:
We really weren't that great of a team last year.
We averaged 38 points per game on offense while the defense only gave up around 10 points per game. It was the first team in Alabama history to score 500+ points in a single season. While the defense wasn't as good as 2011's, they still managed to shut out 4 opponents and came dangerously close to shutting out two others (Florida Atlantic and Mississippi State).
2012 Alabama was a very good team.
This post was edited on 7/25/13 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 7/25/13 at 9:04 pm to WhiskeyBent
Updyke wins
Posted on 7/25/13 at 9:04 pm to WhiskeyBent
sec office implodes trying to figure who to favor
ha j/k
refs give bama the game
ha j/k
refs give bama the game
Posted on 7/25/13 at 9:05 pm to RollTide1987
Easily the worst of the 3 though
Posted on 7/25/13 at 9:06 pm to FourThreeForty
quote:
Easily the worst of the 3 though
Disagree.
2012 > 2009. Better offense with a (statistically) better defense.
Posted on 7/25/13 at 9:09 pm to diddydirtyAubie
quote:
that makes no sense.
It makes perfect sense. The 2010 Auburn national championship season was a fluke made possible by a single player. That's why everyone "underrates" them.
Posted on 7/25/13 at 9:14 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
The 2010 Auburn national championship season was a fluke made possible by a single player.
Troll harder.
Posted on 7/25/13 at 9:14 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
It makes perfect sense. The 2010 Auburn national championship season was a fluke made possible by a single player. That's why everyone "underrates" them.
Settle down brother. Undefeated seasons aren't flukes. Undefeated seasons in the SEC West damn sure aren't flukes.
Realizing their season was in the line down 21-0 or whatever on the road sure as frick wasn't a fluke(should have been 34-0
) That team had the essentials. Great QB. Very good lines. A few stars. And guys hungry enough to get the rest of the work done.
Posted on 7/25/13 at 9:17 pm to Bama Bird
quote:
We really weren't that great of a team last year.
Oh no doubt, except we won the SEC and an NC, and beat the shite out everyone on our schedule not named LSU, TAMU, or UGA, and only lost 1 game. Seems pretty great to me.
Posted on 7/25/13 at 9:17 pm to FourThreeForty
quote:
Easily the worst of the 3 though
nope.
Posted on 7/25/13 at 9:18 pm to WhiskeyBent
According to Auburn fans, they would since they had a better record in 2010.
According to everyone capable of independent thought, Bama wins.
According to everyone capable of independent thought, Bama wins.
Posted on 7/25/13 at 9:19 pm to ReauxlTide222
2010 AU
IMO, 2010 Bama was better than 2012 Bama. The SEC west was better in 2010 as well.
My ranking would be as follows:
2011 Bama
2010 AU
2010 Bama
2012 Bama
IMO, 2010 Bama was better than 2012 Bama. The SEC west was better in 2010 as well.
My ranking would be as follows:
2011 Bama
2010 AU
2010 Bama
2012 Bama
Posted on 7/25/13 at 9:20 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
According to Auburn fans, they would since they had a better record in 2010.
And beat a team that was better than 2012 bama, namely 2010 bama.
quote:
According to everyone capable of independent thought, Bama wins.
Posted on 7/25/13 at 9:21 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
IMO, 2010 Bama was better than 2012 Bama.
I just dont see this. Our defense was better in 2012, and our offense was significantly better in 2012. The difference between the SEC West in those years isnt great enough for me to think that 2010 was better than 2012.
Posted on 7/25/13 at 9:23 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
According to everyone capable of independent thought, Bama wins.
I'm not an AU fan, and I say Auburn wins this game. The opponents they played were probably better than the opponents Bama played last year.
Posted on 7/25/13 at 9:24 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
SEC west was better in 2010 as well
This might be a good thread by itself. Idk if I agree. In your situation you have to exclude Auburn.
Alabama lost 2 other games not counting the one to Auburn. Plus A&M was a huge addition. Ole Miss and Miss St were uhm...full of spunk last year...?
How were they in 2010?
Posted on 7/25/13 at 9:24 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
And beat a team that was better than 2012 bama, namely 2010 bama.
Bama's 2012 offense was infinitely better and the 2012 defense was, at least statistically, better.
And you still needed an epic comeback to beat an inferior team by 1 point.
Posted on 7/25/13 at 9:31 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
That team was and always will be identified by a single player: Cam Newton. He was that team. Nick Fairley also deserves credit but that crystal football should be in Cam Newton's house because it really is his and his alone.
You are kidding right?
For starters, almost every single person that contributed anything to that 2010 run graduated or got kicked off the team before 2011. And in 2008 most of the contributors were freshmen and that season sucked because of coaching more than anything.
Page 2 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News