Started By
Message

re: Any chance Tenn hangs with Oregon?

Posted on 9/9/13 at 3:11 pm to
Posted by Crompdaddy8
Jimmy Rustler
Member since Nov 2009
10569 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 3:11 pm to
fat chance
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
19133 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

I am still waiting for an answer about how our DL is undersized. We aren't going to put 330 pounders out there but I guarantee you they are packing weight and it's lean as hell.



Aaaaaaand...the hook is set. Now you want to run out a little line before you start reeling him in.
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20828 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Oregon has proven it can't beat SEC schools

Tennessee has superior SEC athletes and size, and depth, and will disrupt Oregon offense


I'm not really sure what you're trying to do. Do you really think the bogus threads you've started after our first two wins are going to make it worse when we lose?
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 3:19 pm to
That was an obvious troll. Madmaxvol thinks Jed was trolling as well but I've seen that one too many times to believe that.
This post was edited on 9/9/13 at 3:20 pm
Posted by BamaFan253
Birmingham,AL
Member since Nov 2012
34 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 3:44 pm to
Oregon should win..but hope Tenn pulls it off (only because their an SEC team..that is all)
Posted by BravesDawg
Member since Jun 2013
99 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

I am still waiting for an answer about how our DL is undersized. We aren't going to put 330 pounders out there but I guarantee you they are packing weight and it's lean as hell.


You'll have to get the answer from that redneck. He's a fool in both aspects, no doubt.
Posted by Dr._Jimes_Tooper
Member since Jul 2013
2358 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 5:21 pm to
I hope you're trolling...

Oregon has far superior athletes than UT.

Anyone who thought UT had trouble moving the ball on WKU didn't watch the 2nd half. Worley was 8 of 10 and we ran the ball at will. Playcalling was extremely simplified due to UT scoring 31 unanswered points.

That being said, Ducks win 48-21.
Posted by NCRebel252
Memphis, TN
Member since Jan 2013
210 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 5:52 pm to
Have any of you actually watched Tennessee or Oregon play? With these kinds of responses, I highly doubt it. This game will only be close for about the first quarter, that's it. Tennessee may be better, but they're still not good. Oregon is vastly superior and also, they don't lose at home. Prediction: 52-17 Oregon.
Posted by beejon
University Of Louisiana Warhawks
Member since Nov 2008
7959 posts
Posted on 9/9/13 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

Crazier upsets have happened...so it is possible for sure.


Posted by volfan30
Member since Jun 2010
40949 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 1:49 am to
No. It is a victory for Butch if he keeps within 50. Oregon's new coach will be looking to make a statement against a big bad SEC school. It will get ugly quickly. You will not find a worse QB/WR combo in America than what Tennessee has. Combine that with laughably bad speed defensively and you get a bloodbath.

Tennessee should be getting paid to be the sacrificial lamb in this one.
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42621 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 1:53 am to
Better odds than winning the lotto. Easy money if you win and not a big deal if you lose. It's about the best way to bet on college football. Where you do you bet at?
Posted by Jrv2damac
Kanorado
Member since Mar 2004
65101 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 1:56 am to
I see the game going the same way it did in 2010, UT hangs for about a half, then UO pulls away
Posted by TRUERockyTop
Appalachia
Member since Sep 2011
15817 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 1:59 am to
I think like UVA we can control the interior rush, it's the bounce outside, controlling Mariota, and missed tackles that makes or break this game. If the first man doesn't stop the player with the ball whether it's a DT/SDE/WDE or CB/S we're gonna get our shite pushed in. I don't think we're there yet, but I think we cover the spread as long as it's not 21 points or less
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 2:00 am to
quote:

I think like UVA we can control the interior rush, it's the bounce outside, controlling Mariota, and missed tackles that makes or break this game. If the first man doesn't stop the player with the ball whether it's a DT/SDE/WDE or CB/S we're gonna get our shite pushed in. I don't think we're there yet, but I think we cover the spread as long as it's not 21 points or less


I hate to break this to you. UVA's defense is better than yours.
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42621 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 2:02 am to
quote:

I see the game going the same way it did in 2010, UT hangs for about a half, then UO pulls away


Oregon may hang 200 pts on us but we will not be a team that only plays a half. This team will fight all 4 quarters.
Posted by USMC Gators
Member since Oct 2011
14633 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 2:03 am to
Posted by TRUERockyTop
Appalachia
Member since Sep 2011
15817 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 2:06 am to
Based on what? Their BYU game and our WKU game stats?

Our 2 best pass rushers and a 1st string LB have been out the first 2 games as well. 2 of which we should have back this weekend
Posted by bisonduck
Oregon City, OR
Member since Apr 2011
12977 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 2:08 am to
quote:

Based on what? Their BYU game and our WKU game stats? Our 2 best pass rushers and a 1st string LB have been out the first 2 games as well. 2 of which we should have back this weekend


What makes you think that you're better than UVA should be my question? Harold, their DE, was a 5 star recruit and Brent Urban, their DT, graded out as the best player on their entire team.

McCullers is slow as frick. Hood is undersized. I like Jordan Williams but our tackles are our strength. UVA's DTs were their strength. They move much better laterally than yours.

I saw McCullers try and run a twist. It looked like the dude was in quick sand.
This post was edited on 9/10/13 at 2:12 am
Posted by volfan30
Member since Jun 2010
40949 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 2:10 am to
Jacques Smith is horrible and Curt Maggitt is at about 60%. Vereen is not playing this weekend. A healthy Maggitt may have been able to help keep it within 40, but a Maggitt on one knee is no different than Sapp, probably worse actually.
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42621 posts
Posted on 9/10/13 at 2:20 am to
quote:


Jacques Smith is horrible and Curt Maggitt is at about 60%. Vereen is not playing this weekend. A healthy Maggitt may have been able to help keep it within 40, but a Maggitt on one knee is no different than Sapp, probably worse actually.


You sound like Dooley giving a halftime speech to 'fire' the players up.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter