Started By
Message
re: Add your reasons Mizzou is going to struggle this year and the near future
Posted on 2/19/12 at 11:34 pm to kilo
Posted on 2/19/12 at 11:34 pm to kilo
Wasn't trolling, god that sure is a popular word. Just because someone you don't even know has an opinion you consider extreme doesn't mean it's a flame attempt. My soon to be cousin-in-law is a Mizzou grad and he's cool as shite. His name is Seth, do any of you Tiger fans know him?
1
Posted on 2/19/12 at 11:35 pm to Stonehog
quote:
Just because someone you don't even know has an opinion you consider extreme doesn't mean it's a flame attempt.
Unless it starts ends with "this isn't a flame"
Posted on 2/19/12 at 11:37 pm to 870Hog
Exactly, or 'serious question for ______'
Posted on 2/19/12 at 11:51 pm to Stonehog
quote:
Stonehog
Sorry man. I was thinking of Sunhog.
My bad.
Posted on 2/19/12 at 11:59 pm to SunHog
quote:
SunHog
quote:
Your in-state talent pool along with Kentucky is the worst in the SEC therefore it's difficult.
You're fricking joking right?
arkansas is better than Missouri for in state talent?
You're a husk of a troll Sunhog.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 12:03 am to kilo
quote:
Sorry man. I was thinking of Sunhog.
My bad.
If you call trolling facts, I'll troll everyday.
Explain to me how Missouri will be much better than Kentucky?
Most fertile recruiting ground Alabama, LSU, UGA and Florida (3 with national titles) with the most money putting them at the top of the conference. Wins usually back these facts up.
Middle Recruiting grounds and second tier money *Auburn, Tennessee, Arkansas and South Carolina. (2 of them with national titles)
*Auburn is in excellent recruiting area but is the second name in the state.
Great recruiting ground but less money and facilities MSU, Ole Miss and Vanderbilt.
Least recruiting ground and middle money Kentucky. Missouri will fit into this category so how will the results be different?
Did you notice the trend and how those teams have finished up the past 10 years?
Posted on 2/20/12 at 12:03 am to kilo
quote:
kilo
Well we go into Arkansas all the time to recruit. They never recruit in Missouri.
After that I just stopped responding to it.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 12:11 am to kilo
quote:
You're fricking joking right?
arkansas is better than Missouri for in state talent?
You're a husk of a troll Sunhog.
Yes, Arkansas has better in-state talent than Missouri and is much closer to the fertile recruiting grounds unlike Missouri.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 12:14 am to SunHog
What exactly are you talking about? Arkansas and Kentucky are the two worst recruiting states by far in the SEC. That is probably the only thing holding us back from being an elite team. We had a massive total of 5 in-state players sign with BCS conferences this year. In comparison, Kentucky had 7, Missouri had 16 and Tennessee had 24.
This post was edited on 2/20/12 at 12:15 am
Posted on 2/20/12 at 12:15 am to SunHog
quote:
SunHog
You're clearly doing it wrong... you gave facts. Stop that. All arky posters are supposed to troll... or more specifically, all comments which Mizzou posters disagree with are clearly troll/flame attempts.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 12:21 am to TheCheshireHog
quote:
What exactly are you talking about? Arkansas and Kentucky are the two worst recruiting states by far in the SEC. That is probably the only thing holding us back from being an elite team. We had a massive total of 5 in-state players sign with BCS conferences this year. In comparison, Kentucky had 7, Missouri had 16 and Tennessee had 24.
I'll just make it easy for everyone.
1988-2011 NFL Players by state
Arkansas 79
Missouri 60
LINK
USA Today Database.
This post was edited on 2/20/12 at 12:29 am
Posted on 2/20/12 at 12:33 am to SunHog
SOME ,not all, of the hog fans are terrified of a Mizzou team coming in and having success.
Sunhog would be one of them.
It is entertaining.
Sunhog would be one of them.
It is entertaining.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 12:39 am to TheCheshireHog
quote:
What exactly are you talking about? Arkansas and Kentucky are the two worst recruiting states by far in the SEC. That is probably the only thing holding us back from being an elite team. We had a massive total of 5 in-state players sign with BCS conferences this year. In comparison, Kentucky had 7, Missouri had 16 and Tennessee had 24.
Pretty simple.
By High Schools in Each State.
2005-2011.
Tennessee 20
Arkansas 18
Missouri 15
Kentucky 11
It's obvious Tennessee and Arkansas should be the better programs regardless of the money because closer proximity to deep talent states.
As I said Kentucky and Missouri have less talent than Arkansas. All from USA Today database.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 12:41 am to fibonaccisquared
quote:
You're clearly doing it wrong... you gave facts. Stop that. All arky posters are supposed to troll... or more specifically, all comments which Mizzou posters disagree with are clearly troll/flame attempts.
It's just fun to argue with lazy frickwads who won't use google or research on their own.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 12:45 am to SunHog
How i uze dis "goggle"... I r new 2 teh interwebz.
There are a few cool mizzou posters but seriously they are starting to troll/flame harder than you flagshippers... what they lack in numbers they more than make up in asshattery. Never seen anything quite like it.
There are a few cool mizzou posters but seriously they are starting to troll/flame harder than you flagshippers... what they lack in numbers they more than make up in asshattery. Never seen anything quite like it.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 12:50 am to kilo
quote:
SOME ,not all, of the hog fans are terrified of a Mizzou team coming in and having success.
I'm waiting for you to argue against USA Today.
I'm more worried about Texas A&M. No team north of us has ever had success *cough, kentucky, cough cough*. Maybe you'll do it but the odds are against you.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 12:54 am to fibonaccisquared
quote:
How i uze dis "goggle"... I r new 2 teh interwebz.
There are a few cool mizzou posters but seriously they are starting to troll/flame harder than you flagshippers... what they lack in numbers they more than make up in asshattery. Never seen anything quite like it.
It's just the new kids talking noise before they get their shite kicked in by UGA and the rest of the SEC.
You think Arkansas and Tennessee have disadvantages by location, ha ha.
Posted on 2/20/12 at 1:07 am to SunHog
quote:
I'm waiting for you to argue against USA Today
Missing for the state of Pa from 2005-2011
Bob Sanders
Sanders attended Erie Central High School as a freshman before transferring to Cathedral Preparatory School in Erie, Pennsylvania
Terrelle Pryor
At Jeannette High School, Pryor was clocked at 4.4 seconds in the 40-yard dash
Posted on 2/20/12 at 1:22 am to KillianRussell
quote:
Missing for the state of Pa from 2005-2011
Bob Sanders
Sanders attended Erie Central High School as a freshman before transferring to Cathedral Preparatory School in Erie, Pennsylvania
Terrelle Pryor
At Jeannette High School, Pryor was clocked at 4.4 seconds in the 40-yard dash
I'm sure there is an error or two.
Arkansas has produced more since we finally consolidated high schools and started spring practice and 7 on 7 to which the database proves that.
Arkansas State has put a lot of players in the pro's which shows the state of Arkansas is not valued correctly on recruiting websites.
I'm just glad we aren't Kentucky or Missouri especially in location. There is a reason Tennessee spends the most on recruiting as Arkansas isn't too far behind.
We have a problem of letting our studs go to Auburn, Tennessee and possibly Alabama next year. We've staffed linemen, receivers and running backs for rival teams for many years.
This post was edited on 2/20/12 at 1:26 am
Posted on 2/20/12 at 1:26 am to SunHog
No harm feelings, you dared to find an error with Pryor & Sanders it was pretty quick to pick it up
Page 7 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News