Started By
Message
re: 2012 revenues per USA Today
Posted on 5/8/13 at 10:55 am to MedDawg
Posted on 5/8/13 at 10:55 am to MedDawg
quote:
2012 revenues (from the OP link):
MSU $69.8 million
OM $51.9
MSU > OM by $17.9 million
2011 revenues:
MSU $59.0 million
OM $49.2 million
MSU > OM by $9.8 million
Keep right no thinking State has more money than Ole Miss.
1
Posted on 5/8/13 at 10:58 am to msu202020
quote:
Keep right no thinking
also, we don't report all of our donations to the UMAA.
Posted on 5/8/13 at 11:01 am to pankReb
quote:
also, we don't report all of our donations to the UMAA.
Why not? Why try to hide money? Also link to where they line in from the op doesn't show accurate donation amounts?
This post was edited on 5/8/13 at 11:02 am
Posted on 5/8/13 at 11:01 am to pankReb
MS schools = poors
Posted on 5/8/13 at 11:05 am to Breesus2Jimmy
quote:
MS schools = poors
SEC Schools from MS - $121,687,873
SEC Schools from LA - $114,787,786
This post was edited on 5/8/13 at 11:06 am
Posted on 5/8/13 at 11:15 am to msu202020
quote:
SEC Schools from MS - $121,687,873
SEC Schools from LA - $114,787,786
On average:
MS Schools - 60,843,500
LA Schools - 114,787,786
Posted on 5/8/13 at 11:21 am to MedDawg
I know this topic gets beaten to death every year, but ya'll do realize every school reports revenues differently. Lists like these don't really mean a whole lot.
As far as the Ole Miss/MSU argument goes (I live in MS so I hear it all the time), you do remember that Scott Stricklin came out and said that he was changing the way they report revenues (I would assume to look better to people who care about lists like these). They now report everything. Other schools, like Ole Miss, generally show a minimal profit or net zero on the balance sheet for whatever reason (I would assume to keep the academics from getting too upset).
As far as the Ole Miss/MSU argument goes (I live in MS so I hear it all the time), you do remember that Scott Stricklin came out and said that he was changing the way they report revenues (I would assume to look better to people who care about lists like these). They now report everything. Other schools, like Ole Miss, generally show a minimal profit or net zero on the balance sheet for whatever reason (I would assume to keep the academics from getting too upset).
Posted on 5/8/13 at 11:25 am to WAOMrebears
quote:
There are no way this is right. Mississippi State can not have more revenue than UM. We seat more and have much more concessions available so therefor I'd assume we sell more concessions. Those cow freakers dont spend any money at the game. This is wrong.
That's BS, hell I've been to plenty of games at VHS and you drunkfricks never leave the Grove long enough to buy anything in the stadium.
Inventory losses are part of that equation.
Posted on 5/8/13 at 11:30 am to PanhandleDawg
LOL at Ole Miss and MSU arguing over who has more breadcrumbs.
Worst year in history of UT athletics and we are #12.
Worst year in history of UT athletics and we are #12.
Posted on 5/8/13 at 11:38 am to FulmersGonnaFixIt
quote:
LOL at Ole Miss and MSU arguing over who has more breadcrumbs.
LOL at your shitty football team.
Posted on 5/8/13 at 11:55 am to NYCAuburn
quote:
FWIW, received 5.4 mil, donated back 4.4 mil. But again, it's accounting math as for what that original 5.4 mil came from and what it was for
I looked at the numbers. It is a 1 million for faculty and 3 million for licensing. The USA Today said nothing of the millions Alabama athletics puts into the general scholarship fund, or for facility improvements University wide.
Posted on 5/8/13 at 12:40 pm to CapstoneGrad06
If nothing else, it clearly shows the haves and the have nots. Only a small % subsidize less than 5% of the AD. There are several in the 5-10 range and then after 50 or schools in total the numbers fall off a cliff and the other 75%, including some BCS schools and 60+ FBS subsidize more than 25% of their program let alone profit.
Looks like there is an Elite 15 or so in earnings, a "big-time program" area fro 16-50 and then the trash left over.
Makes Saban's idea of a class 1 FBS division make a lot of sense. These are businesses with vastly different models.
Looks like there is an Elite 15 or so in earnings, a "big-time program" area fro 16-50 and then the trash left over.
Makes Saban's idea of a class 1 FBS division make a lot of sense. These are businesses with vastly different models.
Posted on 5/8/13 at 12:45 pm to msu202020
quote:
Why not? Why try to hide money? Also link to where they line in from the op doesn't show accurate donation amounts?
There's reasons for it, most schools do it. Hell y'all did it 3 years ago. Go look at that link and compare what your donations were 3 years ago. Do you really think y'alll had $0 in contributions. Do you guys really think y'all went from 7-10 mil in contributions to 28 mil a year in 3-4 years?
Strickland is reporting it all so conversations like this one can take place. Gives state something to beat their chest about even if the data is inconsistent. You guys can't really believe that y'all make 18 mil a year than we do. That should throw up red flags right there and I think the majority of your fanbase understand that's and that's why they aren't saying anything. The only state fans in this thread are idiots, noobs, or mr statistician, Engie who looks for any stat to prove State is heading in the right direction at a pace faster than most, especially TSUN
Posted on 5/8/13 at 1:47 pm to msu202020
quote:
LOL at your shitty football team
Hey Old Miss, they left us the pizza crusts to eat. I think we have more than you!!!!!!
Posted on 5/8/13 at 1:50 pm to FulmersGonnaFixIt
quote:
I think we have more than you!!!!!!
Congrats, all of that and still put a shitty arse product on the field.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News