Started By
Message

re: Malzahn: Rule change will stunt scoring

Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:33 pm to
Posted by AdamDeMamp
$900.00
Member since Jul 2013
3276 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

just enforce the current rule.

Why pass a new rule when the current rule isn't enforced? Sort of a liberal dem solution to life


I'd have no problem with that but I don't see conference officials stepping up saying what they would do to better resolve the missed instances by the officials.
Posted by Gladius Veritas
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Member since May 2012
13189 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

And cause even more flags exactly what we need


This isn't about more flags or less flags. It's about stopping teams from abusing a rule that gives the offense a clear advantage
Posted by AUbagman
LA
Member since Jun 2014
10561 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:34 pm to
Posted by Gladius Veritas
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Member since May 2012
13189 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:35 pm to
Considering your coach is the one crying about this, I'm not sure I'd use that gif
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
123594 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:35 pm to
GimmickU

He mad
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
42374 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:36 pm to
I blame the new aluminum bats, they could also switch to the K-2 football (smaller ball) could help passing games.
Posted by schwartzy
New Orleans
Member since May 2014
9027 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:36 pm to
Gimmicks gonna gimmick..
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
42374 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:37 pm to
I'm not sure SEC officials are that competent to enforce this consistently, too many other things to watch for.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
42374 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:38 pm to
You almost need an official in the booth just watching for this and signaling it down
Posted by AUbagman
LA
Member since Jun 2014
10561 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

Considering your coach is the one crying about this, I'm not sure I'd use that gif


I'm sure he was asked to give his opinion, that's answering a question, not crying. He's not Bert trying to ignite a revolution with half-truths.

Regardless, it's fitting an Arky fan would start this thread.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

His comments are nothing more than the usual coach's whine when they take away his favorite toy.


He did not use that play much last year, and will use it less this year. I think his fear is with the Officals and not the rule. One yard leaves a lot to the judgment of the Officals, so playcalling will not take any chances.
Posted by Gladius Veritas
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Member since May 2012
13189 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

I'm not sure SEC officials are that competent to enforce this consistently, too many other things to watch for.


That's a part of the reasoning behind this - making it one yard instead of three makes the call easier for the refs
Posted by Dirty Whistle
Member since Jul 2011
1159 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:39 pm to
Has Saban ever had a rule changed because he used it to his advantage? Don't remember him crying.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

And cause even more flags exactly what we need

It wouldn't cause more flags if players weren't coached to block downfield on passing plays. Now they'll be coached NOT to block downfield.

If it's a rule, just call it enough and players will stop it.
Posted by piggilicious
Member since Jan 2011
37295 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

"This is two years in a row now that something like this has happened, and it looks like this one will get through."


he seems pretty bent out of shape about it to me. bless you gus- stay strong.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51247 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Plus, one yard is ridiculous, a good pancake block will bring you two yards out just falling on top the guy.


I believe if you are engaged with a defender within 3 yards, then the new rule doesn't apply. This applies to OL who are not engaged with a defender past 1 yard.
This post was edited on 3/5/15 at 3:43 pm
Posted by bamamonty
Jasper,Al
Member since Feb 2014
459 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:41 pm to
Isn't the 1yard rule consistent with the pro rule?
Posted by AUbagman
LA
Member since Jun 2014
10561 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:42 pm to
quote:


If it's a rule, just call it enough and players will stop it.


Nah, these "men" would rather initiate another rule . Once someone comes along and finds ways to exploit a different rule, they'll be screaming for another rule change.
This post was edited on 3/5/15 at 3:42 pm
Posted by Gladius Veritas
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Member since May 2012
13189 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

Regardless, it's fitting an Arky fan would start this thread.


I posted it because I saw it on reddit

But yeah, I'm just really obsessed with Malzahn and jealous of Auburn for hiring him. yup
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 3/5/15 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

Isn't the 1yard rule consistent with the pro rule?


Yes, and Seattle and Philly ran that same play all year.
This post was edited on 3/5/15 at 3:45 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter