Started By
Message
USA Today: Top revenue programs
Posted on 5/15/12 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 5/15/12 at 3:34 pm
LINK
V,B
quote:
Tennessee
Operating revenue: $104.4 million (No. 8)
Operating expenses: $97.6 million (No. 8)
V,B
8
Posted on 5/15/12 at 3:36 pm to Crompdaddy8
and what has that yielded?
Posted on 5/15/12 at 3:38 pm to Crompdaddy8
The state of Alabama is pretty much running shite
Posted on 5/15/12 at 3:40 pm to Crompdaddy8
over or under on how many come in saying something about their schools numbers are incorrect in some way?
I'll go with 10
I'll go with 10
This post was edited on 5/15/12 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 5/15/12 at 3:42 pm to Crompdaddy8
3 Michigan
4 Florida
5Bama
6 Penn State
7 Auburn
ETA
the op left out UT is 4th in SEC
4 Florida
5Bama
6 Penn State
7 Auburn
ETA
the op left out UT is 4th in SEC
This post was edited on 5/15/12 at 3:44 pm
Posted on 5/15/12 at 3:43 pm to NYCAuburn
We all know ho the real winner is though
quote:
LSU
Operating revenue: $107.3 million (No. 7)
Operating expenses: $91.8 million (No. 11)
The only athletics program among the top 12 in revenue and expenses that has received no money from the university or from student fees in each of the seven years for which USA TODAY has compiled Division I schools’ annual financial reports to the NCAA. Annual revenue fell by almost $4 million in 2011, but expenses fell by almost $11 million.
Posted on 5/15/12 at 3:44 pm to Crompdaddy8
Posted on 5/15/12 at 3:45 pm to stapuffmarshy
quote:
stapuffmarshy
I was about to post the same thing.
Posted on 5/15/12 at 3:46 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
The state of Alabama is pretty much running shite
That's what happens when your state is ill-equipped to support a professional team.
Posted on 5/15/12 at 3:48 pm to SouthOfSouth
quote:
I was about to post the same thing.
the other 11 take money from the school or students so IMO they are all Losers
LSU gives money back= Winning
Posted on 5/15/12 at 3:48 pm to Tiger Authority
If Alabama got a NFL team I think it would be a huge success. I dont see why Alabama doesnt have one yet granted they need a facility to play at.
Posted on 5/15/12 at 3:53 pm to MsGarrison
No, because the Falcons, Saints, and Titans exist.
Huntsville could've supported one, but Tennessee beat them to the punch.
Huntsville could've supported one, but Tennessee beat them to the punch.
Posted on 5/15/12 at 3:53 pm to TheSandman
quote:No way in hell.
Huntsville could've supported one
Posted on 5/15/12 at 3:56 pm to NYCAuburn
I'll start it off with:
I don't consider student fees to be subsidies.
I don't consider student fees to be subsidies.
Posted on 5/15/12 at 3:56 pm to WDE24
Better shot than Birmingham
Posted on 5/15/12 at 3:56 pm to TheSandman
quote:
Huntsville could've supported one, but Tennessee beat them to the punch.
Huh?
Posted on 5/15/12 at 3:58 pm to TheSandman
quote:
Huntsville could've supported one,
Posted on 5/15/12 at 3:59 pm to WDE24
We do have a semi pro team.
Their home stadium is in Gurley
Their home stadium is in Gurley
Posted on 5/15/12 at 4:00 pm to MsGarrison
quote:
I dont see why Alabama doesnt have one yet granted they need a facility to play at.
Well, they could play at the Birmingham Dome that LaLa wanted to build...oh wait.
Posted on 5/15/12 at 4:01 pm to Crompdaddy8
quote:
Tennessee
Operating revenue: $104.4 million (No. 8)
Operating expenses: $97.6 million (No. 8)
neat. suck on this
quote:
SEC revenue increases since '06:
MSU 129%
Ark 85%
AL 84%,
Miss 67%
SC 61%
LSU 59%
AU 56%
FL 49%
Ky 49%
Ten 41%
GA 17%
This post was edited on 5/15/12 at 4:02 pm
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News