Started By
Message

re: Police in Wash. Shoot Man Running From them with a rock in his hands.

Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:50 pm to
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:50 pm to
Make me, pussy.
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
99110 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

Holy shite. Just because they are having trouble subduing the guy DOESN'T JUSTIFY KILLING HIM. He had a rock, not a gun. If the three of them can't chase him down and tackle him, they shouldn't be cops. The guy posed no threat to their lives, but they used their firearms anyway. If you can't see what's wrong with that from a bigger picture point of view, then I don't know what to say to you.


If people can't accept personal responsibility for their actions, like trying to purposely injure officers, I don't know what to tell you.

But of course they tried to subdue the guy with a taser and it didn't work. I've seen kids jacked up on drugs or having a psychotic break take multiple adults to restrain them. So a lot of broad assumptions being made here about what one or even three cops can do.
This post was edited on 2/12/15 at 3:52 pm
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68539 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

Make me, pussy.

Posted by RedPants
GA
Member since Jan 2013
5417 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

Much less lethal objects have killed people than rocks.


I get what you're saying, but using lethal force, especially when the perpetrator is 15 feet from you, should always be the last resort.
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

The guy posed no threat to their lives, but they used their firearms anyway. If you can't see what's wrong with that from a bigger picture point of view, then I don't know what to say to you.


A rock to the temple could be deadly.. not always.. but... Did they know if he had any other weapons? Did he make any lethal threats while attacking, while running. Did he ever put his hands in his pockets as if attempting to get a weapon after the attack? Was he in a deranged state? Could he have been a threat to other people in public?

I'm not saying they were justified at all.. but making definitive statements before all the facts are out are asinine.. from both sides.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68539 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

should always be the last resort.

I agree but I don't feel like the cops shooting the guy was unjustified. He was trying to harm officers. If someone is trying to harm an officer then I think they have every right to defend themselves in a way they deem appropriate.
Posted by RedPants
GA
Member since Jan 2013
5417 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

If people can't accept personal responsibility for their actions, like trying to purposely injure officers


So if I walk up to someone in a bar and punch him square in the face, do I deserve to be shot dead in retaliation? I just intentionally tried to injure, right?
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

Did they know if he had any other weapons? Did he make any lethal threats while attacking, while running. Did he ever put his hands in his pockets as if attempting to get a weapon after the attack? Was he in a deranged state? Could he have been a threat to other people in public?


One or more of these will be the explanation from police at the end of their "investigation."
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68539 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

So if I walk up to someone in a bar and punch him square in the face, do I deserve to be shot dead in retaliation?

Yep. If that person feels like you are threatening their life, they should be able to retaliate how they deem fit.
This post was edited on 2/12/15 at 3:55 pm
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
99110 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

So if I walk up to someone in a bar and punch him square in the face, do I deserve to be shot dead in retaliation? I just intentionally tried to injure, right?


You know you can kill a guy that way right?
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
99110 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

One or more of these will be the explanation from police at the end of their "investigation."


And you don't sound biased at all.
Posted by Spirit Of Aggieland
Houston
Member since Aug 2011
4607 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:55 pm to
If he is running away, then he is not attempting any harm at that point
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68539 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

One or more of these will be the explanation from police at the end of their "investigation."

So unless they come out and arrest the police officers you won't believe anything the investigation releases?
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

If someone is trying to harm an officer then I think they have every right to defend themselves


Absolutely.

quote:

in a way they deem appropriate


Yes and no. Officers are trained to escalate force based on the threat to themselves and the public and to de-escalate when the situation is under control. Again.. a few seconds of video with no context for what happened before... can't give anyone a logical determination of if they were justified or not. An investigation should.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68539 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

If he is running away, then he is not attempting any harm at that point

People don't turn while they're running to throw objects or shoot at people pursuing them?
Posted by Alahunter
Member since Jan 2008
90738 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

If he is running away, then he is not attempting any harm at that point


I guess you missed the vid of the guy in Oklahoma a few weeks ago.. running and pulling a weapon.. dropping it, stopping to pick it back up and point as he continued to flee..
Posted by RedPants
GA
Member since Jan 2013
5417 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Yep. If that person feels like you are threatening their life, they should be able to retaliate how they deem fit.


Wow. So it all depends on that person's feeling on the situation? Slipperiest of all slopes.
Posted by Rebelgator
Pripyat Bridge
Member since Mar 2010
39543 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Make me, pussy.





No, really.


Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68539 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:57 pm to
Alahunter is the only person in this thread with any damn sense.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

And you don't sound biased at all


I've never hidden my bias towards cops. They have entirely too much power, and are given way too much leeway in these scenarios. Not to mention a lenghty history of covering up their misdeeds in their internal investigations.

There have been stories posted here where I supported the cops' actions 100%. This one doesn't look like one of those stories though.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter