Started By
Message

I blame The South for Confederate nescience

Posted on 6/26/15 at 11:04 am
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 11:04 am
Two major reasons I believe the Confederate flag is misunderstood.

1. The majority of The South doesn't know their own history -- they've allowed the victors to write history, and they've swallowed it.

2. Ignorant/racist people, red-necks, and hoosiers have used the Confederate Flag more than any other niche of people, causing severe brand damage. Affluent southerners have been too afraid and/or too ignorant to the truth to associate with it.

It's a shame that a real key-stone to our country (the civil war) is so incredibly misunderstood.
This post was edited on 6/26/15 at 11:05 am
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145075 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 11:09 am to
Melt, year 150
Posted by DownSouthJukin
Coaching Changes Board
Member since Jan 2014
27184 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Ignorant/racist people, red-necks, and hoosiers have used the Confederate Flag more than any other niche of people


Don't forget the Nicarauguan Contras! They use the Battle Flag as a symbol of rebellion against the government. I saw it plastered on taxis in San Jose, Costa Rica in the early 2000's and asked a local about it. Apparently, they had been using it for quite sometime and it was commonplace to see it as one of their symbols.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 11:14 am to
quote:


Melt, year 150



Does this mean that it's so long ago it doesn't matter?

Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
118922 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 11:39 am to
quote:

The majority of The South doesn't know their own history -- they've allowed the victors to write history, and they've swallowed it.


That's obvious by posts on this board recently.
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46415 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

the Confederate flag is misunderstood.


If it's misunderstood as being a racist emblem, then what in your opinion is it supposed to stand for?
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
95872 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

they've allowed the victors to write history,


I believe there's a saying for this
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 12:23 pm to
quote:


the Confederate flag is misunderstood.


If it's misunderstood as being a racist emblem, then what in your opinion is it supposed to stand for?



Anti private international central banking. Anti New World Order. Anti oppressive federal government. Anti Crown. Anti master.

In ways the 'Don't Tread On Me' flag is a neutered Confederate Flag.

There are multiple layers to the 'truth' about the Civil War -- one layer hits on the fact the war wasn't about slavery; there was no moral justice taking place. As you go much deeper it's apparent the war was created by the international power class for a variety of intended outcomes.

There are so many bits and angles of truth to look at that totally change the landscape of how the civil war is perceived -- from wage slavey in the north, to the small percentage of slave owners in the south, to the fact better machinery would've soon eliminated slavery as it was known in the south, and so on.

If the truth was better understood, the flag would probably be better understood.
This post was edited on 6/26/15 at 12:28 pm
Posted by rootisback
Member since Mar 2014
3371 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 12:37 pm to
A lot of that can be said for every war. Humans gonna Human
Posted by SEC. 593
Chicago
Member since Aug 2012
4040 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

Anti master.



Of all the things it could stand for, I don't think this is one.
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33329 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

to the fact better machinery would've soon eliminated slavery as it was known in the south


What kind of machinery do you think would have eliminated slavery?
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 12:41 pm to
Those 'anti' responses were part joking.

But yes, in a way, anti-master.

Isn't that what 'don't tread on me' means?


Posted by SEC. 593
Chicago
Member since Aug 2012
4040 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 12:42 pm to
The cotton gin, of course.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

A lot of that can be said for every war. Humans gonna Human


Yes, the international power class has been behind every war.

Good observation.
Posted by SEC. 593
Chicago
Member since Aug 2012
4040 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 12:44 pm to
I just thought it was funny that the flag of the people fighting to remain able to be "master's" can be considered "anti master".
Posted by Stonehog
Platinum Rewards Club
Member since Aug 2011
33329 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

The cotton gin, of course.


Is that a joke?

The cotton gin actually forced an increase in the number of slaves.

quote:

Use of the new gin quickly spread across the South. This invention made it possible to grow large amounts of cotton on big farms and make money. So even though the cotton gin meant less people or slaves had to operate it, it made growing cotton more profitable so that more and more people planted more and more cotton. This meant they needed more slaves.

In 1793, when Whitney patented his gin, there were 188,000 pounds of cotton grown for markets in the U.S. By 1810, there were 93 million pounds of cotton produced. This affected the growth of slavery. In 1790, there were 657,000 slaves in southern states. By 1810, there were almost 1.3 million.
Posted by crispyUGA
Upstate SC
Member since Feb 2011
15919 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

The cotton gin, of course.


The cotton gin allowed for the de-seeding of cotton bolls very quickly, but it did not harvest the cotton. The gin could process in a matter of hours what it would take a group of slaves to process in a week. Still needed slaves to get the cotton from the field to the gin, though.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 1:02 pm to
And the cotton gin has been advanced, yes?

Do you think northern factory workers getting paid nothing, with no place to live, in conditions with zero concern for safety, where people died often, both at work and in the slums was slavery?

No other country needed a civil war to remove slavery.

Slavery has existed far and wide throughout history, the fact the Confederate Flag is most associated with it is for a reason.

The South's independent mindedness was a huge problem for the globalist agenda.



Posted by CarolinaCock
South Carolina
Member since Jun 2012
2606 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 1:02 pm to
The flag is not misunderstood if you read the words of its original designer you will clearly see the intent of its purpose.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 1:16 pm to
The Civil War is most definitely misunderstood, on various levels.

Which automatically creates a misunderstanding about the Confederacy.


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter