Started By
Message
re: Grand Jury Finds That Officer's Use of Deadly Force Not Authorized...
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:03 pm to TbirdSpur2010
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:03 pm to TbirdSpur2010
with power comes greater responsibility and higher expectations to deal with shite. Also when you are public servant you should expect that people will hold you accountable to do your job. Does it make it right to bait them into situations? not really, but if you know that they are trying to bait you then you shouldn't fall for it.
quote:nope, I'm right as always.
Incorrect.
1
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:06 pm to heartbreakTiger
quote:
with power comes greater responsibility and higher expectations to deal with shite.
Still not an excuse.
quote:
Also when you are public servant you should expect that people will hold you accountable to do your job.
This doesn't even apply to what we were discussing
quote:
Does it make it right to bait them into situations? not really
Period.
quote:
nope, I'm right as always.
You're right sometimes, and when you're wrong (like now), I set you straight
This post was edited on 4/22/14 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:07 pm to Rebelgator
should it be illegal to video cops? I think that would set a dangerous precedent for possible abuse. I don't think dick bags should bait you into situations, but i also don't see a problem with video taping a traffic stop. If you are doing your job then it shouldn't matter.
Plus does it really matter if they video tape you, since you will just destroy their phone anyways?
Plus does it really matter if they video tape you, since you will just destroy their phone anyways?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:08 pm to heartbreakTiger
Its harassment. Plain and simple.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:09 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:yes it is, if they can't handle being taped and held accountable they could get another job. No one is being tricked into being a cop and thinking it is a cake walk.
Still not an excuse
quote:taping a cop doing his job is holding them accountable, taping and baiting two different things.
This doesn't even apply to what we were discussing
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:11 pm to Rebelgator
so you think all videoing of cops should be illegal? that is a pretty dangerous slope if you think that. Also people are told check points shouldn't bother you if you aren't doing anything wrong, so taping shouldn't bother you if you aren't doing anything wrong.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:13 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
Its harassment. Plain and simple.
Harassment??? Mother fricker, my taxes pay your salary, I'll video tape you if I want, and if I still have a camera that requires tape. You're a public servant, service deez nuts.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:14 pm to Vols&Shaft83
K 
Have fun with the Federal Indictment.
Have fun with the Federal Indictment.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:15 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
Have fun with the Federal Indictment.
Go get me a beer
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:16 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:17 pm to Rebelgator
You= Public Servant
Me= Member of Public
Get me a beer, the frick is so complicated?
Me= Member of Public
Get me a beer, the frick is so complicated?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:25 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
Have fun with the Federal Indictment.
Has something changed that I wasn't aware of?
quote:
The law in 38 states plainly allows citizens to record police, as long as you don’t physically interfere with their work. Police might still unfairly harass you, detain you, or confiscate your camera. They might even arrest you for some catchall misdemeanor such as obstruction of justice or disorderly conduct. But you will not be charged for illegally recording police.
Twelve states—California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, and Washington—require the consent of all parties for you to record a conversation. But do not despair if you live in these states: All but 2 —Massachusetts and Illinois—have an “expectation of privacy provision” to their all-party laws that courts have ruled does not apply to on-duty police (or anyone in public). In other words, it’s technically legal in those 48 states to openly record on-duty police.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:29 pm to Yat27
I was kidding.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News