re: Anybody ever see 911:In Plane Site?

quote:

---

I think you should take a break from all the superficial stuff that creates your cotton candy reality.. but I don't tell you that, I leave you be.

---

You learned your lesson the last time you engaged me on here, back when you were going by MoGrayback.

quote:

---

You learned your lesson the last time you engaged me on here, back when you were going by MoGrayback.

---

I doubt you ever taught anyone a lesson on this subject. Again, you're free to engage in the discussion if you wish.

I'm not much on consipiracy theory either. Primarily for reasons already stated--just like with the "faked" moon landing.

Someone, somewhere would talk.

Still: FRICK WTC 7.

That one bugs me.

Umm, I'm not interested in twisted facts about phone calls and box cutter terminology origins, id just simply like to know where she is now, if she was never on a plane that never hit the Pentagon.
Ill hang up and listen.

quote:

---

You know man, someone with a little imagination could make a "documentary" on why the "Illuminati" are really former residents of Mars, and millions would believe it.

---

Except in 911 documentaries actual facts are brought to light that are not apart of the narrative that the mainstream has been fed.

The documentary in your analogy would involve no facts, it would be pure speculation.

So I'm gonna have to say that was a really poor analogy.

Meh. United 93 people mentioned knives and bombs. I don't know why the phone call was falsified, if that was the case at all, but assuming the box cutter thing is false what's the alternative?

Oh, I thought saying the only call mentioning box cutters apparently being false was implying that box cutters weren't used.

I like to question stuff, but when someone tells me box cutters weren't used I wonder why I was told box cutters were used by the media/the powers that be if they weren't and what would someone/something gain by saying box cutters were used instead of whatever was the truth?

I can't think of an answer for either, so I just wondered why it was brought up. I assumed you had an alternative view on what happened and was interested to find out what it was.

Yeah, I read. I just wondered what the implication of the US Solicitor General's wife's call apparently not happening meant in your mind as it related to box cutters.

I understand now that it was just an opportunity to share your knowledge.

As you think back through all our encounters I think you'll find I'm generally only a dick in response to dick shite directed at me. Dick shite generally comes from you in the form of Chicago comments or Cubs quips. I'll respond, but will never fire the first shot at someone. In this case, no shots were fired until recently, and, as such, I didn't respond in kind.

I wasn't trying to be a dick at all. I was genuinely interested in a theory. Since you don't have one, I'll go to bed.

You know how some people are on you because you're kind of odd and no matter what valid point you bring up it's always invalidated because someone mentions that you're kind of crazy/an alter/think you're smarter than everyone?

You know how that doesn't really bother you that much, but it's just annoying that it has to be addressed because some weak minded individual thinks they have to bring it up every fricking time you say something? That's you with the Chicago thing.

It doesn't bother me as much as it's hack material. If you were creative with your shite it wouldn't bother me, I'd even enjoy it. I'd just think you're a dick, but at least you put some thought into being a dick and the humor factor would be worth it. Instead you just choose to be a hack and repeat the same shite over and over like the people you don't like doing that to you.

Porker is obsessed with Missouri in a fairly unhealthy way but I enjoy him because he's always got a new way of looking at attacking Missouri and it always keeps people on their toes, it takes talent. You're the opposite.

quote:

---

Where in this content would you think there was a theory involved? You're too smart to have been misguided by anything I said.

---

To get back to the point. When you invalidate something there almost has to be a point to bringing up the fact that it's invalid. So the call that said box cutters apparently didn't actually occur, what's the point of bringing it up? Do you think they accomplished the feat of hijacking planes with guns, pepper spray, bomb threats?

Bringing up the point and then not following it up is pointless. It's like saying, "I know this tidbit of information, but I have no desire to put it into any context."

I just don't understand the reasoning for a Bush administration official to lie about box cutters. That's why I asked. I figured if you knew the guy lied that you had a theory as to why he would lie.

Go back and read, I was doing the normal thing and just trying to have a conversation. Just like every other time we've had an encounter.

Okay, bed time for real now.

Night.