Started By
Message
re: Anybody else on here hiding from PoliTalk board?
Posted on 10/13/16 at 11:48 am to DoreonthePlains
Posted on 10/13/16 at 11:48 am to DoreonthePlains
quote:
Anybody else on here hiding from PoliTalk board?
quote:
you keep saying Trump is a racist with no evidence, and there are tons of black people supporting him. you just want to scare black people so they are not open to voting for him. that is basicaly racism. you want to keep black people on the democrat plantation.
Well, you could read 13 unquestionably racist comments and actions from Trump thanks to Huffington Post. Now, I'm sure you'll just attack the source instead of addressing any of the actual situations, but I can't FORCE you to educate yourself. His bigotry is not just about race either. There are plenty of other examples of him making sexist or religiously divisive comments.
And ya know what, Hillary may well be the worst racist and bigot on the planet. She at least has the tact to keep her hate speech private.
you guys accuse every GOP of racism. Your party is the historic party of racism, it supported slavery, KKK, Jim Crow, Civil war, lynching , segregation, etc. Your party has not even bothered to change its name, which is a dog whistle to white racists.
calling republicans racist is just how you trying to keep blacks voting Democrat and democrats are very worried Trump is going to get a significant number of black voters.
This post was edited on 10/13/16 at 11:49 am
1
Posted on 10/13/16 at 1:02 pm to Tillman
quote:
what conservative person is racist on this forum.
About once a month a thread pops up over there asserting black people are disproportionately poor and uneducated because they are inherently less intelligent as a race. It's usually met by at least 50% upvotes.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 1:22 pm to Tillman
quote:
you guys accuse every GOP of racism.
Which "you guys" are you talking about? Heavily conservative but still rational Americans that are basically dying inside because there isn't an intelligent conservative option? By the way, I've only called one member of the Republican party racist. Unfortunately, the people I share so many ideologies with chose a candidate that is a deplorable human being.
Honestly, I don't give one flying frick what demographics vote for which candidate. This election has been way too accurately lampooned by South Park as being between a turd sandwich and giant douche. Unfortunately, there is no voting option to disqualify both and reset the primaries.
The GOP could literally have basically any of the other candidates from the primary be running against Hillary, and they would have my vote. Stop trying to make this an "us vs them" mentality of party against party. This is logic and reason against one pathetic and despicable person who is an embarrassment to humanity.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 2:03 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
earn a "boy who cried wolf" label with regards to the Hillary prosecution. I challenge them to produce their smoking gun evidence of nefarious Hillary and every time I look into it and try to decide for myself, it's obvious their smoking gun is nothing more than circumstantial, something taken way out of context, or something I wouldn't consider a disqualifying/criminal event.
You're right; Hillary, like the Bushes are squeaky clean.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 2:15 pm to DoreonthePlains
quote:
The GOP could literally have basically any of the other candidates from the primary be running against Hillary, and they would have my vote.
Me too. Not sure about Cruz, I'm way more moderate than him, but I'd have voted for any of the others.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 2:17 pm to DoreonthePlains
quote:
The GOP could literally have basically any of the other candidates from the primary be running against Hillary, and they would have my vote. Stop trying to make this an "us vs them" mentality of party against party. This is logic and reason against one pathetic and despicable person who is an embarrassment to humanity.
i don't buy this, you would be using this exact same phony rhetoric regardless of candidate. liberals are so dishonest, so many won't even admit they are liberals.
This post was edited on 10/13/16 at 2:19 pm
Posted on 10/13/16 at 2:19 pm to Roger Klarvin
obviously liberal Democrats think blacks are dumb given you think a reasonable requirement to have photo ID to vote is racist as though black people are too dumb to be able to figure out how to get a photo ID.
This post was edited on 10/13/16 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 10/13/16 at 2:35 pm to Tillman
quote:
i don't buy this, you would be using this exact same phony rhetoric regardless of candidate. liberals are so dishonest, so many won't even admit they are liberals.
You know your own rhetoric is so flimsy that you deflect by ignoring the actual argument and just attacking me. YOU and others like you are literally the problem with America. Please, stop, and join an honest, intelligent discussion. You are a shame to your own party.
ETA: I would like to add that you did almost exactly as I predicted. When faced with evidence of Trump's racist remarks THAT YOU WANTED TO BE PROVIDED, you IGNORED the actual incidents where Trump made racial remarks and fell back on whining and accusations. You are acting exactly like Trump.
This post was edited on 10/13/16 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 10/13/16 at 2:39 pm to DoreonthePlains
i can just as easily use your empthy rhetoric against you. you are virtue signalling but not explain how you are more virtuous than me and others.
i believe you are a liberal who is being coy about it.
we ran ROmney last time, he is about as good a person as you will find on this earth, and the exact opposite of Trump in personality, he is basically Ned Flanders, and Democrat party demonized him as well.
i believe you are a liberal who is being coy about it.
we ran ROmney last time, he is about as good a person as you will find on this earth, and the exact opposite of Trump in personality, he is basically Ned Flanders, and Democrat party demonized him as well.
This post was edited on 10/13/16 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 10/13/16 at 2:41 pm to Tillman
quote:
i can just as easily use your empthy rhetoric against you. you are virtue signalling but not explain how you are more virtuous than me and others.
What? I never said that I am more virtuous than anyway. I have claimed to be more willing to enter into an open and honest discussion, which my previous comments support. When you asked for evidence to support my accusations against Trump, I provided a list of 13 such incidents. Meanwhile, as I edited my previous comment to say, you have ignored the evidence that YOU asked me to provide then fallen back on making personal attacks on me.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 2:42 pm to Tillman
Romney would be destroying Clinton right now. Instead, the Republicans chose the one person that in unelectable.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 2:43 pm to Tillman
quote:
we ran ROmney last time, he is about as good a person as you will find on this earth, and the exact opposite of Trump in personality, he is basically Ned Flanders, and Democrat party demonized him as well.
Have I made any comments disparaging Romney? I was supportive of Romney in the last election cycle. I wish he had run again.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 2:48 pm to DoreonthePlains
lol you probably wish he had run again b/c he lost last time. Trump is running a much more aggressive campaign against HIllary than Romney ran against Obama which is much of the reason he lost. he let Obama get away with demonizing him. keep in mind Obama went to a racist church for 20 years and was flaunting his erection for female journalists, which is sexual harrassment.
This post was edited on 10/13/16 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 10/13/16 at 2:50 pm to Ag Zwin
I enjoy discussing politics, particular during this contentious election. But that place is filled with far fringe lunatics.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 3:23 pm to Tillman
quote:
lol you probably wish he had run again b/c he lost last time
I would actually probably vote for Romney if he was running against Hillary.
This post was edited on 10/13/16 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 10/13/16 at 3:28 pm to Tillman
quote:
was flaunting his erection for female journalists, which is sexual harrassment.
I wonder why none of those female journalists have forward and objected? Do you think it's because they're liberals?
Posted on 10/13/16 at 3:33 pm to Kentucker
quote:
I would actually probably vote for Romney if he was running against Hillary.
As would I, and I voted for Johnson last time.
quote:
I wonder why none of those female journalists have forward and objected? Do you think it's because they're liberals?
Or because it never actually happened? But Tillman heard it on Breitbart! It HAS to be true!
Posted on 10/13/16 at 3:37 pm to semotruman
Breitbart. I think that's the enterprise that Trump is negotiating a deal with after the election.
Posted on 10/13/16 at 3:44 pm to Tillman
quote:
Trump is running a much more aggressive campaign against HIllary than Romney ran
.... and going to lose by a much wider margin
quote:
you probably wish he had run again b/c he lost last time
After praising Romney in an above post, you criticize anyone who would want such a swell guy to be president
Posted on 10/13/16 at 3:46 pm to pvilleguru
quote:
I would actually probably vote for Romney if he was running against Hillary.
I actually think a guy like Romney could've won this year against Hillary had he run instead of Trump.
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News